Business – 5.2 Sources of finance – Selecting the source of finance | e-Consult
5.2 Sources of finance – Selecting the source of finance (1 questions)
Login to see all questions.
Click on a question to view the answer
Each source has distinct strengths and weaknesses when judged against three criteria:
- Objectivity: The degree to which the source is free from personal bias.
- Relevance to managerial performance: How directly the source measures the responsibilities of a store manager.
- Practicality: Cost, time required to collect and analyse the data.
1. Sales figures and KPI dashboards
- Objectivity – Very high; numbers are factual.
- Relevance – High for financial targets, but may overlook non‑financial aspects such as staff development.
- Practicality – Data are automatically generated; low additional cost.
2. Customer satisfaction surveys
- Objectivity – Moderate; responses can be influenced by external factors (e.g., product availability).
- Relevance – Directly reflects service quality, a core managerial duty.
- Practicality – Requires survey design and periodic distribution; moderate cost.
3. Peer‑review questionnaires
- Objectivity – Low to moderate; peers may be reluctant to give negative feedback.
- Relevance – Provides insight into teamwork, leadership, and internal processes.
- Practicality – Time‑consuming to administer and collate; may need anonymity safeguards.
4. Self‑assessment reports
- Objectivity – Low; managers may over‑state achievements.
- Relevance – Useful for understanding personal goals and perceived challenges.
- Practicality – Easy to collect, but must be triangulated with other sources for credibility.
For a balanced appraisal, the retailer should combine the highly objective sales data with customer surveys for service quality, and supplement both with peer and self‑assessments to capture leadership and developmental aspects.