Students will be able to select and apply a finish that is appropriate for the material and product design, considering functional, aesthetic, economic, health‑&‑safety and sustainability factors.
| Assessment Objective (AO) | What is assessed in this unit | Exam weighting (approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| AO1 – Knowledge and understanding | Properties of materials, processing stages, types of finishes, advantages/limitations, health & safety, environmental impact. | ≈ 30 % |
| AO2 – Application of knowledge | Choosing a finish for a given material and brief; carrying out surface preparation, finish application and curing. | ≈ 30 % |
| AO3 – Analysis and evaluation | Justifying finish selection using a weighted decision matrix; evaluating the finished product against the specification and sustainability criteria. | ≈ 20 % |
| AO4 – Communication | Presenting finish choices with sketches, tables, annotated diagrams and electronic symbols; recording process steps and quality‑control results. | ≈ 20 % |
| Design Process Stage | Key Activities | Link to Finishing (AO2/AO3) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Identify the problem | Define brief, functional requirements, constraints. | Finish requirements (corrosion, wear, appearance, ergonomics) are identified here. |
| 2. Research | Investigate materials, existing finishes, market trends, health & safety legislation. | Provides data for the decision‑matrix and sustainability analysis. |
| 3. Develop design specifications | List performance, aesthetic, cost, environmental and safety criteria. | Finish‑related criteria (colour, gloss, durability, VOC limits) are recorded. |
| 4. Concept generation | Sketches, CAD models, material‑finish combinations. | AO4 – communicate options with annotated visuals and electronic symbols. |
| 5. Detailed design | Final drawings, bill of materials (BOM), process plan. | Specify surface preparation, finish type, application method, safety precautions. |
| 6. Manufacture & assemble | Forming, machining, joining, heat‑treatment. | Each preceding stage influences the surface condition for finishing. |
| 7. Finishing (this unit) | Surface preparation → finish application → curing → inspection → documentation. | Core of AO1‑AO4 for this unit. |
| 8. Test & evaluate | Functional testing, aesthetic appraisal, cost review, sustainability audit. | AO3 – evaluate whether the chosen finish meets the specification and environmental targets. |
| 9. Review & improve | Identify improvements for future iterations. | Feedback may lead to alternative finishes or process changes. |
Finishing is not an isolated activity; it touches every major syllabus topic. The table below shows the explicit connections.
| Syllabus Topic | Relevance to Finish Selection & Application |
|---|---|
| 1 – Design process | Finish decisions are made during specification, concept generation and detailed design. |
| 2 – Design principles & good‑design criteria | Functionality, aesthetics, ergonomics, sustainability and economy directly influence finish choice. |
| 3 – Communication | Use of drawings, surface‑finish symbols, colour keys and electronic symbols to convey finish information. |
| 4 – Society & sustainable design | Consider life‑cycle impact, VOC emissions, recyclability and ethical sourcing of finish chemicals. |
| 5 – Health & safety | Risk assessments for solvents, powders, blasting media, curing ovens and personal protective equipment (PPE). |
| 6 – Aesthetics & ergonomics | Colour, texture, gloss, slip‑resistance and tactile feel are controlled by the finish. |
| 7 – Materials & components | Compatibility of finishes with metals, polymers, ceramics and composites. |
| 8 – Stages in processing | Finishing is the final stage but is dependent on earlier forming, machining, joining and heat‑treatment. |
| 9 – Energy & control | Power requirements for spray guns, ovens, curing lamps; process‑control sensors and PLC logic. |
| 10 – Technology | Emerging finishes (e.g., PVD, nanocoatings) and digital tools (simulation of colour, virtual inspection). |
| 11 – Industrial & commercial practice | Batch size, lead time, cost estimation, quality‑management standards (ISO 9001). |
| 12 – Quantity production | Scalability of finishing processes – line‑side spray vs. batch powder coating. |
| 13 – Quality systems | Inspection methods, acceptance criteria, traceability of finish records. |
| 14 – Emerging technologies | Laser surface texturing, 3‑D printed functional finishes, bio‑based coatings. |
| 15 – Digital technology | Use of CAD/CAM for surface‑finish simulation, data‑logging of process parameters. |
| 16 – Sustainable manufacturing | Life‑cycle analysis of coating systems, waste‑minimisation, closed‑loop powder recovery. |
| 17 – Health & safety in the workplace | Specific regulations (COSHH, REACH) for chemicals used in finishing. |
| 18 – Economic considerations | Cost‑benefit analysis of high‑performance vs. low‑cost finishes. |
Ra = 1.6 µm) according to BS 308.| Symbol | Name / Function |
|---|---|
| ⏚ | Power supply / mains connection (used for ovens, curing lamps). |
| ⏚‑‑ | Switch (manual start/stop of spray gun or conveyor). |
| ⏚ → ⧖ | Motor driving a conveyor or rotating part. |
| ⧖ ⟶ ⧖ | Sensor (e.g., temperature probe in a curing oven). |
| ⧖ ⟶ ⏚ | Actuator (e.g., solenoid valve controlling powder‑spray flow). |
| ⚡ ⟶ ⧖ | PLC or controller output to a process device. |
Use the checklist below to filter options before populating a weighted decision matrix.
| Finish | Typical Materials | Key Advantages | Limitations | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paint (solvent‑based) | Steel, aluminium, wood, polymers | Wide colour range; easy to apply; low equipment cost. | Requires thorough surface prep; can chip; VOC emissions. | Consumer goods, furniture, automotive body panels. |
| Paint (water‑based) | Steel, aluminium, wood, polymers | Low VOC; good for indoor use; good colour retention. | Longer drying time; may need higher film thickness for durability. | Appliances, toys, indoor furniture. |
| Powder coating | Steel, aluminium, zinc‑die‑cast alloys | Durable, uniform thickness, environmentally friendly (no solvents). | Requires curing oven (150‑200 °C); limited colour gradients. | Outdoor equipment, appliances, architectural hardware. |
| Electroplating (chrome, nickel, zinc) | Conductive metals – steel, brass, copper | High wear & corrosion resistance; decorative shine. | Complex setup; hazardous chemicals; thickness control critical. | Tooling, automotive trim, bathroom fittings. |
| Anodising | Aluminium alloys | Hard porous oxide layer; can be dyed; excellent corrosion resistance. | Only aluminium; colour limited to anodic dyes. | Aerospace components, consumer‑electronics housings. |
| Varnish / lacquer | Wood, polymers | Enhances natural grain; provides moisture barrier. | Susceptible to UV yellowing; may require re‑coating. | Furniture, musical instruments, decorative panels. |
| Thermal spray (ceramic, metal) | Metals, ceramics | Very high wear resistance; can repair worn surfaces. | Expensive equipment; relatively rough surface finish. | Aerospace turbine blades, oil‑field components. |
| PVD (Physical Vapour Deposition) | Metals, ceramics, polymers (with suitable priming) | Ultra‑thin, hard, decorative coatings; low waste. | High capital cost; line‑of‑sight process. | Watch cases, medical instruments, high‑end consumer electronics. |
Rₐ = 1.0–2.5 µm for optimal paint adhesion.Rate each finish against the criteria identified in the checklist. Multiply the rating (1–5) by the weight (1–5) and sum to obtain a weighted score.
| Criterion | Weight (1‑5) | Powder Coating | Anodising | Chrome Plating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corrosion resistance | 5 | 4 × 5 = 20 | 5 × 5 = 25 | 3 × 5 = 15 |
| Wear resistance | 4 | 3 × 4 = 12 | 5 × 4 = 20 | 5 × 4 = 20 |
| Cost | 3 | 4 × 3 = 12 | 2 × 3 = 6 | 2 × 3 = 6 |
| Design flexibility (colour/texture) | 4 | 5 × 4 = 20 | 2 × 4 = 8 | 3 × 4 = 12 |
| Environmental impact | 2 | 5 × 2 = 10 | 5 × 2 = 10 | 1 × 2 = 2 |
| Total Score | 74 | 69 | 55 |
In this example, powder coating obtains the highest weighted score, supporting its selection for a medium‑size outdoor aluminium‑alloy component.
Rₐ ≈ 0.2 µm) and adhesion (cross‑cut ≥ 4B).Create an account or Login to take a Quiz
Log in to suggest improvements to this note.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.