Analyse, evaluate and develop facts, ideas and opinions.

Cambridge IGCSE English Language 0500 – Reading

Learning Objectives (AO R1‑R5)

Students will analyse, evaluate and develop facts, ideas and opinions in a range of texts, demonstrating the ability to:

• Identify explicit and implicit meaning (R1, R2).
• Distinguish fact from opinion and evaluate arguments (R3).
• Explain how writers achieve effects (R4).
• Select and organise information for a specific purpose (R5).

---

AO R1 – Identify Main Ideas and Supporting Details

• Locate the central idea(s) of a passage.
• Pick out supporting facts, figures, examples and quotations.
• Note the hierarchy of information (primary vs. secondary).
• Use a simple planning grid: Idea | Supporting Detail | Source.

---

AO R2 – Analyse Explicit & Implicit Meaning

Explicit meaning: what the writer says directly.

Implicit meaning: what the writer suggests, implies or expects the reader to infer.

How to move from identification to analysis

1. Spot linguistic cues (modal verbs, evaluative adjectives, contrastive connectors, presuppositions).
2. Ask: “What does this cue reveal about the writer’s attitude, purpose or assumed audience?”
3. Link the implied meaning back to the overall argument or theme.

Implicit‑Meaning Checklist

• Modal verbs (might, could, must, should)
• Evaluative adjectives/adverbs (e.g., “remarkable”, “unfortunately”)
• Emotive or loaded language
• Presuppositions and assumptions
• Contrastive structures (although, however, nevertheless)
• Pronoun choice (we, they, you) that positions the reader

Think‑Aloud Example (Implicit Analysis)

“If we continue to ignore the warning signs, the coastal towns will soon be underwater.”

Step 1 – Explicit: The writer states a future consequence (towns underwater).

Step 2 – Implicit cues: “If we continue” (modal ‘continue’ = ongoing responsibility), “ignore the warning signs” (assumes warnings exist and are credible), “soon” (urgency).

Step 3 – Implicit meaning: The writer is urging immediate action, positioning the reader as part of “we” who can act, and suggesting that inaction is irresponsible.

Step 4 – Effect: Creates a sense of urgency and collective responsibility, nudging the reader toward agreement with the writer’s stance.

---

AO R3 – Distinguish Fact from Opinion & Evaluate Arguments

Feature	Typical Indicators	How to Evaluate (Checklist)
Fact	Dates, statistics, verifiable data, citations, proper nouns.	Can the information be verified from a reliable source? Is the data recent and relevant? Is the source reputable (academic, official, peer‑reviewed)?
Opinion	Modal verbs, first‑person pronouns, evaluative adjectives, phrases such as “I think”, “in my view”, “it is clear that”.	Identify the writer’s stance or attitude. Consider possible bias or personal experience. Check whether the opinion is supported by evidence.

Argument‑Evaluation Checklist (R3)

• Relevance: Does the evidence directly support the claim?
• Credibility: Is the source trustworthy and up‑to‑date?
• Balance: Are counter‑claims acknowledged?
• Logic: Is the reasoning sound (no logical fallacies)?
• Assumptions: What presuppositions underlie the argument?

---

AO R4 – How Writers Achieve Effects (Writer’s Techniques)

Identify the device, explain its purpose and note the impact on the reader.

• Tone & Register – formal, informal, sarcastic, urgent.
• Rhetorical Questions – involve the reader, emphasise a point.
• Imagery & Figurative Language – metaphor, simile, personification create vividness.
• Repetition & Parallelism – reinforce ideas, add rhythm.
• Structure & Cohesion
  • Headings, sub‑headings, paragraphing, logical sequencing.
  • Signposting words (firstly, moreover, in contrast, consequently).
  • Linking devices (however, because, therefore, likewise).
• Word Choice (Connotation) – subtle shades of meaning that influence attitude.

Device‑Spotting Mini‑Exercise

Read the paragraph below, underline each device and write the effect in the margin.

“The city’s skyline, a jagged crown of steel, glitters under the night sky, yet the streets below whisper of poverty that no neon can hide.”

---

AO R5 – Purpose‑Driven Selection & Organisation of Information

Choose extracts that best suit the task and organise them before writing.

Planning Template (Purpose‑Driven Selection)

Purpose (e.g., summary, persuasive letter, report)	Extract (copy verbatim)	Reason for Inclusion (fact, opinion, effect)
Summary (50 words)
Letter to the editor (argument)
Scientific report (factual)

Selection Tips

• Identify the task purpose (inform, persuade, entertain).
• Match extracts to that purpose: factual data for reports, evaluative language for persuasive pieces.
• Omit irrelevant material that does not support the intended outcome.
• Arrange chosen extracts in a logical order using the planning template before drafting.

---

Reading Process (Re‑ordered to match the syllabus)

1. Preview (R1) – Scan title, headings, sub‑headings, pictures, bold/italicised words.
2. First Read (R1) – Read quickly for overall gist and purpose.
3. Detailed Read (R1‑R3) – Annotate:
   • Key facts & figures (R1).
   • Opinions, arguments, and counter‑claims (R3).
   • Language features (rhetorical questions, imagery, cohesion devices – R4).
4. Analyse (R2‑R4) – Ask:
   • What is the explicit message?
   • What is implied? (use the Implicit‑Meaning Checklist)
   • How does the writer achieve the intended effect? (identify devices, tone, structure)
   • Who is the audience and what is the purpose?
5. Evaluate (R3) – Judge the strength of arguments using the Argument‑Evaluation Checklist:
   • Relevance, credibility, balance, logic, assumptions.
   • Identify bias (use the Bias Radar worksheet).
   • Consider alternative viewpoints.
6. Select & Develop (R5) – Use the planning template to choose extracts, then write a response that:
   • Integrates selected facts with your own ideas.
   • Uses appropriate terminology (tone, purpose, bias, connotation, etc.).
   • Is tailored to the required task (summary, opinion piece, report).

Cross‑Skill Link (Reading ↔ Writing ↔ Speaking)

• Reading analysis provides evidence for the **writing** tasks (e.g., using a factual extract in a report).
• Selected extracts and personal evaluations can be rehearsed for **speaking** activities such as debates or presentations.
• Feedback from peer‑review (speaking) reinforces the evaluation criteria used in reading.

---

Key Terminology (Exam Language)

• Explicit meaning
• Implicit meaning
• Fact / Opinion
• Purpose
• Audience
• Tone / Register
• Bias / Assumption
• Connotation / Denotation
• Attitude / Perspective
• Rhetorical device (metaphor, simile, repetition, parallelism, rhetorical question)
• Cohesion device (signposting, linking words)
• Structural feature (paragraphing, headings, logical sequencing)

---

Bias Radar Worksheet (R3)

For each statement, note any underlying assumption and its possible impact on the argument.

Statement	Assumption	Impact on Reader
“Everyone knows that electric cars are the future.”	Assumes universal agreement and inevitability.	May persuade readers to accept the claim without evidence.
“Only a small minority supports the new tax, so it must be ineffective.”	Equates popularity with effectiveness.	Leads readers to dismiss the policy without examining data.

---

Text‑Type Quick‑Guide (R5)

• News report – factual, objective, inverted‑pyramid structure.
• Editorial / Opinion piece – subjective, persuasive, strong voice.
• Feature article – descriptive, uses anecdotes and vivid language.
• Scientific report – precise, data‑driven, formal register.
• Letter to the editor – concise, argumentative, often includes a call‑to‑action.

---

Key Skills and Development Strategies

Skill (AO)	Description	Development Strategies
Identifying Facts (R1)	Recognising verifiable information.	Highlight dates, statistics, names; verify with a reliable source.
Distinguishing Opinions (R3)	Spotting personal judgments or beliefs.	Look for modal verbs, evaluative adjectives, first‑person language.
Evaluating Arguments (R3)	Assessing logic, relevance and sufficiency of evidence.	Use the Argument‑Evaluation Checklist; practice with bias‑radar worksheets.
Understanding Writer’s Techniques (R4)	Analysing how language creates effect.	Annotate devices; discuss impact in pairs; include cohesion & structural features.
Purpose‑Driven Selection (R5)	Choosing information that fits a specific task.	Practice extracting excerpts for different purposes; use the planning template before writing.
Developing Own Ideas (R5)	Extending discussion with personal insight, backed by evidence.	Write 150‑word responses linking a fact from the text to a personal viewpoint; peer‑review for clarity.

---

Sample Classroom Activities

• Fact‑Opinion Sort (R1, R3) – Provide mixed statements; students place each into “Fact” or “Opinion” columns.
• Argument Mapping (R3) – Create a table showing main claim, supporting evidence, counter‑claims, and evaluation of each.
• Device Spotting (R4) – Use the mini‑exercise above; discuss how each device shapes meaning.
• Bias Radar (R3) – Complete the worksheet for a chosen passage.
• Purpose‑Driven Selection (R5) – Choose extracts for three different tasks using the planning template.
• Critical Response Writing (R5) – 150‑word response that evaluates the author’s viewpoint and adds a personal perspective.
• Peer Review (R3‑R5) – Exchange responses; use the Assessment Checklist to give feedback.
• Speaking Extension – Students present their critical response in a short oral debate, linking reading analysis to spoken argumentation.

---

Assessment Checklist (Marks 0‑5)

Criterion (AO)	What to Look For	Marks (0‑5)
Identification of Facts (R1)	Accurate selection of verifiable information; correct citation of data.
Recognition of Opinions (R3)	Clear distinction between author’s opinions and factual statements; use of appropriate markers.
Evaluation of Arguments (R3)	Logical assessment of evidence, identification of bias/assumptions, balanced judgement using the checklist.
Understanding Writer’s Techniques (R4)	Identification of devices (including cohesion & structural features) and explanation of their effect on meaning and audience.
Purpose‑Driven Selection & Development (R5)	Relevant extracts chosen for the task; original response that integrates text evidence with personal insight; use of planning template.
Use of Language Features (R4‑R5)	Appropriate terminology (tone, purpose, bias, connotation, etc.) used accurately throughout.

---