Economics – Classification of goods and services | e-Consult
Classification of goods and services (1 questions)
Login to see all questions.
Click on a question to view the answer
While the government-provided healthcare system appears to be a free good, it doesn't perfectly align with the strict definition. The key characteristics of a free good – non-rivalrous and non-excludable – are partially met, but with caveats.
Arguments for classifying healthcare as a free good:
- Non-rivalrous (to a degree): One person receiving healthcare doesn't necessarily prevent another from receiving it. However, increased demand can lead to longer waiting times and resource constraints, making it less non-rivalrous in practice.
- Non-excludable (ideally): In a universal healthcare system, access is not based on ability to pay. This fulfills the non-excludability criterion.
Arguments against classifying healthcare as a free good:
- Rivalrousness (in practice): Limited resources mean that access to healthcare is often restricted, effectively making it rivalrous. Waiting lists and rationing are evidence of this.
- Cost (implicit excludability): While not directly excludable, the cost of providing healthcare is borne by taxpayers. This creates an implicit form of excludability – those who don't contribute through taxes may not benefit from the system.
Conclusion: The government healthcare system is a complex case. While it aims to be non-excludable, the practical realities of limited resources and demand create rivalrousness. Therefore, it's more accurate to describe it as a good that *approximates* a free good, rather than a perfect example.