Sociology – Paper 3 – Education and inequality | e-Consult
Paper 3 – Education and inequality (1 questions)
Login to see all questions.
Click on a question to view the answer
The nature‑versus‑nurture debate centres on whether genetic inheritance (nature) or environmental factors (nurture) play the dominant role in shaping intelligence and, consequently, educational outcomes.
- Twin studies (e.g., Bouchard & McGue, 1981): Identical twins reared apart show high correlations (r ≈ .70‑.80) in IQ scores, suggesting a strong genetic component. However, differences in educational achievement between twins often reflect divergent school environments, indicating that nurture also matters.
- Adoption studies (e.g., Plomin & DeFries, 1995): Children adopted into families of differing socioeconomic status (SES) tend to attain educational levels more similar to their adoptive parents than to their biological parents, highlighting the influence of environmental factors such as school quality, parental expectations, and cultural capital.
Overall, contemporary sociologists adopt an interactionist perspective: genetics may set potential limits, but social contexts (family background, school resources, peer groups) shape the actualisation of that potential. Policies that improve early childhood education and reduce socioeconomic inequalities can therefore mitigate genetic disadvantages.