Computer Science – 16.2 Translation Software | e-Consult
16.2 Translation Software (1 questions)
Login to see all questions.
Click on a question to view the answer
There are significant trade-offs between interpreted and compiled languages. Here's a comparison:
| Feature | Interpreted Language | Compiled Language |
| Execution Speed | Generally slower. Each line is translated and executed at runtime. | Generally faster. The entire source code is translated into machine code before execution. |
| Portability | More portable. The same source code can run on any platform with an interpreter for that language. | Less portable. The compiled code is typically platform-specific and needs to be recompiled for each target platform. |
| Ease of Development | Easier to develop and debug. No separate compilation step is required. Changes can be tested quickly. | More complex development process. Requires a compilation step, which can be time-consuming. Debugging can be more involved. |
| Memory Usage | Can sometimes have higher memory usage due to the interpreter needing to be present during execution. | Generally lower memory usage during execution, as the compiled code is independent. |
In summary, interpreted languages prioritize ease of development and portability, while compiled languages prioritize execution speed and performance. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project.