Economics – Economic development - Poverty | e-Consult
Economic development - Poverty (1 questions)
Login to see all questions.
Click on a question to view the answer
The Argument for Inefficiency:
- Disincentive to Work: As mentioned previously, generous benefits can reduce the incentive to seek employment, leading to a smaller workforce and reduced overall economic output. This represents an inefficient allocation of resources.
- Targeting Issues: Benefits may be distributed to individuals who do not genuinely need them, leading to a waste of public funds. Means-testing can be complex and costly.
- Moral Hazard: A safety net that is too generous can create a moral hazard, where individuals take on more risk knowing they will be protected by the state.
- Administrative Costs: The bureaucracy involved in administering a complex benefit system can be expensive and time-consuming.
Alternative Policies & Counterarguments:
- Job Creation Schemes: Government-funded programs that create jobs for the unemployed can be a more efficient way to alleviate poverty. This directly addresses the issue of unemployment.
- Education & Training Programs: Investing in education and training can equip individuals with the skills needed to secure higher-paying jobs, leading to greater self-sufficiency.
- Raising the Minimum Wage: Increasing the minimum wage can improve the incomes of low-wage workers, reducing poverty and inequality.
- Targeted Welfare Programs: Focusing benefits on those with specific needs (e.g., single parents, disabled individuals) can improve efficiency and reduce waste.
- Reducing Inequality through Taxation: Progressive taxation (higher earners pay a larger percentage of their income in taxes) can fund social programs and reduce income inequality.
Evaluation:
Whether more generous state benefits are inefficient depends on the specific context. While they can be costly and potentially disincentivize work, they provide a crucial safety net and can stimulate the economy. However, a combination of policies – including job creation, education, and targeted welfare – is likely to be a more effective and efficient approach to tackling poverty in the long run. The key is to design a comprehensive strategy that addresses both the symptoms and the root causes of poverty.