ICT 0417 – The Systems Life Cycle: Implementation Methods
The Systems Life Cycle – Implementation Phase
After a system has been designed, built, tested and approved, it must be introduced into the organisation. Four main methods are used to move from the old system to the new one.
1. Direct Changeover (Big‑Bang)
This method switches off the old system and switches on the new system at a single point in time.
Characteristics : Immediate, all‑or‑nothing transition.
Typical Uses : Small organisations, low‑risk systems, or when the old system is no longer functional.
Advantages
Fast implementation – no period of dual operation.
Low cost – no need to maintain two systems simultaneously.
Clear cut‑over point simplifies planning.
Disadvantages
High risk – any failure leaves the organisation without a working system.
Little opportunity to correct problems after go‑live.
Staff may be unprepared for sudden change.
2. Parallel Running
Both the old and the new systems operate simultaneously for a defined period.
Characteristics : Redundant operation; data is entered into both systems.
Typical Uses : Critical systems (e.g., payroll, finance), high‑risk environments.
Advantages
Safety net – if the new system fails, the old system continues to operate.
Allows thorough testing with real data.
Provides time for staff training.
Disadvantages
Increased cost – two systems must be maintained.
Potential for data entry errors and inconsistencies.
Longer implementation period.
3. Pilot Running (Trial Implementation)
The new system is introduced to a limited area, department or group before full roll‑out.
Characteristics : Controlled trial; feedback is used to refine the system.
Typical Uses : Large organisations, systems with varied user requirements, or when the impact is uncertain.
Advantages
Identifies problems early in a low‑risk environment.
Allows customisation based on real user feedback.
Reduces overall disruption to the organisation.
Disadvantages
May delay full benefits until the pilot is completed.
Requires careful selection of the pilot group to be representative.
Potential for “pilot‑itis” – endless tweaking before wider release.
4. Phased Implementation (Staged Roll‑out)
The new system is introduced in stages, either by function (e.g., accounting first) or by geography (e.g., one branch at a time).
Characteristics : Incremental deployment; each phase builds on the previous one.
Typical Uses : Large, complex systems; organisations with multiple sites or departments.
Advantages
Spreads cost and resource demand over time.
Allows users to adapt gradually.
Problems can be isolated to a specific phase.
Disadvantages
Longer overall implementation period.
Requires careful integration between old and new modules during overlap.
Potential for inconsistency if phases are not well coordinated.
Comparison of Implementation Methods
Method
Risk Level
Cost
Implementation Speed
Typical Use Cases
Direct Changeover
High
Low
Very Fast
Small, low‑risk systems
Parallel Running
Low
High
Slow
Critical, high‑risk systems
Pilot Running
Medium
Medium
Moderate
Large organisations, uncertain impact
Phased Implementation
Medium
Medium
Gradual
Complex, multi‑site or multi‑function systems
Suggested diagram: Flowchart showing the four implementation methods and their key characteristics.