Causes of market failure relating to public goods, merit goods, demerit goods, external costs and external benefits, abuse of monopoly power

2.9 Market Failure – Allocation of Resources

2.9.1 Definition

Market failure occurs when the free market does not allocate resources efficiently, resulting in a loss of economic welfare (dead‑weight loss).

2.9.2 Key Terminology (syllabus wording)

TermDefinition (syllabus wording)Illustrative Example
Public goodNon‑excludable and non‑rivalrous; the market tends to under‑provide.National defence, street lighting
Merit goodA good that generates positive externalities or is socially desirable; tends to be under‑consumed.Education, vaccinations, public libraries
Demerit goodA good that generates negative externalities or is socially undesirable; tends to be over‑consumed.Tobacco, alcohol, illegal drugs
Private benefitThe benefit that accrues directly to the individual consumer or producer.Enjoyment from watching a TV programme
External (or social) benefitBenefit that accrues to third parties who are not part of the transaction.Reduced disease spread from a neighbour’s vaccination
Social benefitPrivate benefit + external (or social) benefit.Education: personal earnings (private) + higher national productivity (external)
Private costThe cost incurred directly by the producer or consumer.Wages paid by a factory
External (or social) costCost imposed on third parties not reflected in the market price.Air pollution affecting nearby residents
Social costPrivate cost + external (or social) cost.Factory production: wages (private) + health costs from pollution (external)

2.9.3 Causes of Market Failure

2.9.3.1 Public Goods

  • Features: non‑excludable & non‑rivalrous.
  • Market outcome: free‑market provision is zero or far below the socially optimal level because firms cannot charge users.
  • Government intervention:

    • Direct provision financed by taxation.
    • Public‑private partnerships where the state subsidises private provision.

Diagram suggestion – supply‑demand for a public good showing the free‑market quantity (Qm) versus the socially optimal quantity (Qs) where marginal social benefit (MSB) = marginal social cost (MSC).

2.9.3.2 Merit Goods

  • Goods that generate positive externalities or are deemed socially desirable.
  • Typical under‑consumption because private marginal benefit (PMB) < social marginal benefit (SMB) at the market equilibrium.
  • Examples: education, vaccinations, public libraries, preventive health care.
  • Policy tools:

    • Subsidies (lower price, shift demand right).
    • Free or heavily subsidised provision.
    • Compulsory consumption (e.g., school‑attendance laws).

2.9.3.3 Demerit Goods

  • Goods that generate negative externalities or are socially undesirable.
  • Typical over‑consumption because private marginal benefit (PMB) > social marginal benefit (SMB) at the market equilibrium.
  • Examples: tobacco, alcohol, fast food, illegal drugs.
  • Policy tools:

    • Excise (sin) taxes – raise price, shift demand left.
    • Regulation – age limits, licensing, advertising bans.
    • Public‑awareness campaigns.
    • Complete bans where the social cost is extremely high.

2.9.3.4 Externalities

2.9.3.4.1 Negative externalities (external costs)

  • Production or consumption imposes costs on third parties that are not reflected in the market price.
  • Result: over‑production/over‑consumption (Qm > Qs).
  • Examples: factory pollution, noise from airports, traffic congestion.
  • Policy responses:

    • Pigouvian (corrective) tax equal to the external cost per unit.
    • Regulation – quantity limits, technology standards.
    • Tradable permits/quotas (e.g., carbon trading).
    • Command‑and‑control (mandatory abatement).

2.9.3.4.2 Positive externalities (external benefits)

  • Production or consumption confers benefits on third parties that are not captured in the market price.
  • Result: under‑production/under‑consumption (Qm < Qs).
  • Examples: research & development, education, immunisation, public parks.
  • Policy responses:

    • Subsidies or grants that shift the private marginal cost downwards.
    • Public provision (e.g., free schooling, NHS immunisation programmes).
    • Tax incentives for private R&D (R&D tax credit).

Diagram suggestion – negative externality showing marginal private cost (MPC) versus marginal social cost (MSC) with the dead‑weight loss between the competitive equilibrium (Qc, Pc) and the socially optimal point (Qs, Ps).

2.9.3.5 Abuse of Monopoly Power

  • A monopoly can restrict output and charge a price above marginal cost, creating allocative inefficiency and a dead‑weight loss.

2.9.3.5.1 Sources of monopoly power (2.9.5.1)

  • Natural monopoly – high fixed costs and low marginal costs (e.g., water, electricity distribution).
  • Government‑granted monopoly – licences, patents, copyrights.
  • Strategic barriers – control of essential resources, aggressive pricing, product differentiation.

2.9.3.5.2 Government actions to curb monopoly power (2.9.5.2)

  • Price caps or rate‑of‑return regulation.
  • Breaking up the monopoly (e.g., liberalisation of telecoms).
  • Encouraging competition – antitrust legislation, removing entry barriers.
  • Public ownership of natural monopolies.

Diagram suggestion – monopoly diagram showing marginal revenue (MR), marginal cost (MC), monopoly price (Pm) and output (Qm) compared with the competitive equilibrium (Pc, Qc), highlighting the dead‑weight loss.

2.9.4 Consequences of Market Failure (2.9.4)

  • Production/consumption occurs at a level where private marginal benefit ≠ social marginal benefit or private marginal cost ≠ social marginal cost.
  • Resulting dead‑weight loss represents a loss of total (consumer + producer) surplus.
  • Allocative inefficiency: resources are not used where they generate the greatest net benefit to society.

2.9.6 Summary Table of Market Failure Types

Failure TypeKey CharacteristicTypical ExampleCommon Government Intervention
Public goodsNon‑excludable & non‑rivalrous → under‑provisionNational defence, street lightingDirect provision, funded by taxation
Merit goodsPositive externalities → under‑consumptionEducation, vaccinationsSubsidies, free provision, compulsory attendance
Demerit goodsNegative externalities → over‑consumptionTobacco, alcoholExcise taxes, age limits, bans, public‑health campaigns
Negative externalitiesExternal costs not reflected in price → over‑productionFactory pollution, traffic congestionPigouvian tax, regulation, tradable permits
Positive externalitiesExternal benefits not reflected in price → under‑productionR&D, immunisationSubsidies, grants, public provision
Monopoly powerMarket power → higher price, lower outputUtility companies, patented drugsPrice caps, regulation, competition policy, public ownership

2.9.7 Key Points to Remember for the Exam

  1. Market failure justifies government intervention; the aim is to move the market outcome toward the socially optimal level.
  2. Public goods are non‑excludable and non‑rivalrous, so the market cannot charge users – they require collective provision.
  3. Merit goods are under‑consumed; demerit goods are over‑consumed. Use subsidies or free provision for merit goods, and taxes or regulation for demerit goods.
  4. Externalities create a gap between private and social costs/benefits. Corrective taxes, subsidies, regulation, or tradable permits are the main tools.
  5. Monopolies generate dead‑weight loss by producing less and charging more than in perfect competition. Price caps, rate‑of‑return regulation, breaking up the monopoly, or public ownership are common responses.
  6. When answering exam questions, always:

    • Define the type of market failure using the exact syllabus wording.
    • Explain why the free market leads to an inefficient outcome (include the relevant diagram).
    • Identify at least two government interventions and evaluate their likely effectiveness (consider equity, efficiency, and practicality).