Describe and apply suitable methods to assess the distribution and abundance of organisms in a defined area, and understand how these data link to the wider study of biodiversity, its measurement, threats and conservation.
The Linnaean hierarchy (required for the syllabus) is:
A species name is written in binomial form: Genus species (italicised, genus capitalised). Example:
Panthera leo – the African lion (Genus Panthera, species leo).
| Category | Criteria (simplified) | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Extinct (EX) | No individuals remaining | Thylacine |
| Extinct in the Wild (EW) | Only survives in captivity | California condor (early 1980s) |
| Critically Endangered (CR) | Very high risk of extinction | Amur leopard |
| Endangered (EN) | High risk of extinction | Asian elephant |
| Vulnerable (VU) | High risk of medium‑term extinction | Red panda |
| Near Threatened (NT) | Close to qualifying for a threatened category | Polar bear |
| Least Concern (LC) | Widespread and abundant | House sparrow |
Density = Number of individuals ÷ Area surveyed (units = individuals m⁻²).
Pure count of different species recorded in the sample.
| Index | Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Shannon‑Wiener (H′) | \$H' = -\sum{i=1}^{S} pi \ln pi \quad\text{where}\; pi = \frac{n_i}{N}\$ | Higher values = greater diversity; sensitive to rare species. |
| Simpson’s Diversity (D) | \$D = 1 - \sum{i=1}^{S}\frac{ni (n_i-1)}{N(N-1)}\$ | Probability that two random individuals belong to different species (higher = more diverse). |
| Evenness (E) | \$E = \frac{D}{D_{\max}} = \frac{D}{1-1/S}\$ | How evenly individuals are distributed among the species present (0–1). |
\$pA=0.40,\;pB=0.267,\;pC=0.133,\;pD=0.200\$
\$H' = -(0.40\ln0.40+0.267\ln0.267+0.133\ln0.133+0.200\ln0.200)=1.28\$
Use this checklist when planning any of the field methods described later.
| Design Element | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Sampling strategy | Random, systematic or stratified sampling; ensure the sample is representative of the whole habitat. |
| Replication | At least 5–10 replicates per treatment; more for heterogeneous habitats. |
| Controls & baseline | Include an un‑disturbed area or a known‑density reference site where possible. |
| Pilot study | Test quadrat size, transect length, detection width, and marking technique before the main survey. |
| Ethics & safety | Obtain permits, use non‑toxic marks, minimise handling time, wear appropriate PPE. |
| Sources of error | Observer bias, edge effects, non‑uniform distribution, loss of marks, population change between captures. |
Below is a simple table format that can be adapted for any method.
| Sample/Quadrat | Area (m²) | Species A | Species B | … | Total individuals (N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | … | 30 |
| 2 | 1 | … | … | … | … |
Typical graphs:
Best for: sessile or slow‑moving organisms (plants, lichens, intertidal invertebrates).
Density calculation (individuals m⁻²):
\$\text{Density} = \frac{\displaystyle\sum{k=1}^{Q} Nk}{Q \times A_q}\$
Assumptions: uniform distribution within each quadrat; sample is representative of the whole habitat.
Best for: mobile fauna that can be detected from a line (birds, mammals, large insects).
Density (individuals m⁻²):
\$\text{Density} = \frac{C}{L \times 2w}\$
Bias notes: detection probability declines with distance from the line; using a fixed width reduces but does not eliminate this bias. If detection is uncertain, distance‑sampling methods (beyond the syllabus) may be required.
Best for: mixed communities where both sessile and moderately mobile organisms are of interest.
Overall density (individuals m⁻²):
\$\text{Density} = \frac{\displaystyle\sum \text{All individuals recorded}}{\text{Belt area (m²)}}\$
Assumptions: same as quadrats and line transects combined; sub‑quadrats are representative of the belt.
Best for: estimating the size of mobile animal populations where direct counts are impractical (small mammals, amphibians, insects, fish).
Lincoln Index (units = individuals):
\$N = \frac{M \times C}{R}\$
| Method | Typical Target | Key Advantages | Major Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame Quadrats | Plants, lichens, sessile invertebrates | Simple, quantitative density, easy replication; good for species‑rich, low‑mobility communities. | Unsuitable for highly mobile species; edge effects; may miss rare species if quadrat number is low. |
| Line Transects | Birds, mammals, large insects | Rapid coverage of large areas; minimal habitat disturbance. | Detection probability declines with distance from line; requires clear line of sight. |
| Belt Transects | Mixed communities, vegetation gradients, medium‑mobility fauna | Combines area coverage with detailed sampling; allows simultaneous study of sessile and mobile organisms. | More time‑consuming; requires well‑defined belt boundaries; still subject to detection bias. |
| Mark‑Release‑Recapture (Lincoln Index) | Small mammals, amphibians, insects, fish | Provides an absolute estimate of population size; accounts for detectability. | Assumes closed population; marking may affect behaviour; low recapture rates increase error. |
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.