The macroeconomic aims of government: redistribution of income

Published by Patrick Mutisya · 14 days ago

IGCSE Economics – Government Macro‑economic Intervention: Redistribution of Income

Government Macro‑economic Aim: Redistribution of Income

Redistribution of income is a key macro‑economic objective for governments. It seeks to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor, ensuring a more equitable share of national income and improving social cohesion.

Why Governments Redistribute Income

  • To correct market outcomes that lead to excessive inequality.
  • To promote social justice and reduce poverty.
  • To increase aggregate demand by raising the disposable income of low‑income households.
  • To minimise the risk of social unrest and improve political stability.

Key Instruments of Redistribution

1. Taxation

Taxes can be designed to take a larger proportion of income from higher earners and a smaller proportion from lower earners.

Tax TypeDefinitionEffect on Income Distribution
Progressive TaxTax rate increases as taxable income rises.Reduces inequality by shifting income from high‑income to low‑income groups.
Regressive TaxTax rate decreases as taxable income rises (e.g., sales tax).Can increase inequality because low‑income households spend a larger share of their income.
Proportional (Flat) TaxSame tax rate for all income levels.Neutral effect on relative income distribution, though absolute impact differs.

2. Direct Transfers

Payments made directly to individuals or households without a corresponding service.

  • Unemployment benefits
  • Child benefit
  • State pensions
  • Universal credit

3. Indirect Transfers (Subsidies)

Government assistance that reduces the price of essential goods and services.

  • Housing subsidies
  • Fuel or electricity rebates
  • School meal vouchers

4. Public Services

Provision of free or low‑cost services such as education, healthcare, and public transport benefits lower‑income groups.

Measuring the Impact of Redistribution

Two common measures are used to assess how effectively a government redistributes income:

  1. Gini Coefficient – a number between 0 (perfect equality) and 1 (perfect inequality).
  2. Lorenz Curve – graphical representation of cumulative income distribution.

For example, if a country’s Gini coefficient falls from 0.45 to 0.38 after a series of progressive tax reforms and increased welfare spending, this indicates a reduction in income inequality.

Potential Trade‑offs

  • Efficiency vs Equity: High taxes on labour can discourage work effort, potentially reducing overall output.
  • Budget Constraints: Expanding welfare programmes requires financing, which may increase public debt.
  • Incentive Effects: Generous benefits may create dependency or reduce the incentive to seek employment.

Example: Progressive Income Tax Calculation

Assume a simple three‑band tax system:

\$\$\text{Tax Payable} =

\begin{cases}

0 & \text{if } Y \leq 10{,}000 \\

0.10(Y-10{,}000) & \text{if } 10{,}000 < Y \leq 30{,}000 \\

2{,}000 + 0.20(Y-30{,}000) & \text{if } Y > 30{,}000

\end{cases}\$\$

Where \$Y\$ is annual taxable income. This structure ensures that higher earners pay a larger proportion of their income in tax.

Suggested diagram: Lorenz curve before and after redistribution, showing a shift towards greater equality.

Summary

  • Redistribution aims to reduce inequality and promote social welfare.
  • Key tools include progressive taxation, direct transfers, subsidies, and public services.
  • Effectiveness is measured using the Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve.
  • Policymakers must balance equity objectives with potential efficiency costs.