Explain how natural selection, artificial selection, the founder effect and genetic drift (including the bottleneck effect) may affect allele frequencies in populations.
This topic (Topic 17 – Selection & Evolution) is a gateway to the A‑Level extensions (Topics 12‑19) and builds on several earlier units.
| Prerequisite Unit | Key Concepts Required Here |
|---|---|
| Topic 6 – Nucleic acids & protein synthesis | DNA → RNA → protein; mutation types; alleles & genotypes |
| Topic 5 – Mitotic cell cycle & meiosis | Meiosis produces haploid gametes; segregation of alleles |
| Topic 5/6 – Inheritance (Mendelian & non‑Mendelian) | Dominance, co‑dominance, polygenic traits – link to phenotypic variation |
| Topic 5 – Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HW) | Understanding p, q, p², 2pq, q² and the assumptions that HW makes |
What you’ll need later (A‑Level extensions): concepts of homeostasis, control, classification, and genetic technology all rely on an understanding of how allele frequencies can change.
Deterministic, non‑random force that changes allele frequencies because some genotypes have higher fitness.
The change in allele frequency caused by selection is:
\[
\Delta p = \frac{p q \, (wA - wa)}{\bar w}
\]
\[
\bar w = p^{2}w{AA}+2pq\,w{Aa}+q^{2}w_{aa}
\]
Suppose a population has:
Step‑by‑step:
\[
\bar w = (0.16)(1.1)+(0.48)(1.0)+(0.36)(0.9)=0.176+0.48+0.324=0.98
\]
\[
wA = \frac{(p^{2})w{AA}+pq\,w_{Aa}}{p}= \frac{0.16(1.1)+0.24(1.0)}{0.4}= \frac{0.176+0.24}{0.4}=1.09
\]
\[
wa = \frac{(q^{2})w{aa}+pq\,w_{Aa}}{q}= \frac{0.36(0.9)+0.24(1.0)}{0.6}= \frac{0.324+0.24}{0.6}=0.94
\]
\[
\Delta p = \frac{(0.4)(0.6)(1.09-0.94)}{0.98}= \frac{0.24(0.15)}{0.98}=0.0367
\]
\[
p' = p + \Delta p = 0.4 + 0.0367 \approx 0.44
\]
This shows a modest increase in the favoured allele A due to directional selection.
| Type | Fitness Pattern | Typical Outcome | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Directional | One extreme genotype has highest fitness. | Allele frequency moves toward fixation of the favoured allele. | Peppered moths in polluted woodlands – dark (melanic) form becomes common. |
| Stabilising | Intermediate genotype has highest fitness. | Alleles at the extremes are reduced; mean phenotype stays constant. | Human birth weight – very low or very high weight reduces survival. |
| Disruptive (diversifying) | Both extremes have higher fitness than the intermediate. | Population may split into two distinct phenotypes. | Beak size in Darwin’s finches when two seed types are abundant. |
Human‑directed selection that mimics natural selection but with intentional choice of breeding individuals.
Random (stochastic) change in allele frequencies caused by sampling error in finite populations.
\[
\text{Var}(\Delta p)=\frac{p q}{2Nₑ}
\]
When a population of size N reproduces, the number of copies of allele A in the next generation follows a binomial distribution:
\[
p' \;\sim\; \frac{1}{2N}\,\text{Binomial}(2N,\,p)
\]
To visualise drift, plot allele frequency (p) on the y‑axis against generation number on the x‑axis. Using a spreadsheet, apply the binomial sampling step repeatedly (e.g., 100 generations) and connect the points. Each run will give a different trajectory, illustrating the unpredictability of drift.
A special case of drift that occurs when a new population is established by a small number of individuals taken from a larger source population.
A sharp, temporary reduction in population size caused by an environmental or anthropogenic event.
When a favourable allele is linked to a nearby neutral allele, the neutral allele can increase in frequency simply because it “rides” with the selected allele. This is called genetic hitch‑hiking and is an important concept when interpreting patterns of genetic variation around selected loci.
| Feature | Selection (Natural/Artificial) | Genetic Drift (Random – includes Founder & Bottleneck) |
|---|---|---|
| Directionality | Non‑random; favours alleles that increase fitness. | Random; no preferential direction. |
| Population‑size dependence | Effective in any size; in large populations selection usually outweighs drift. | Most pronounced in small populations (low Nₑ). |
| Speed of allele‑frequency change | Can be rapid if selection coefficient s is large. | Generally slower; depends on stochastic sampling. |
| Effect on genetic variation | May reduce variation at the selected locus; other loci largely untouched. | Reduces overall variation; bottlenecks and founder events cause large losses. |
| Predictability | Predictable from fitness differences (deterministic). | Unpredictable; outcomes differ between replicate populations. |
| Typical outcome for a neutral allele | Frequency unchanged unless linked to a selected locus. | May drift to fixation or loss. |
Allele frequencies are dynamic. Deterministic forces such as natural and artificial selection drive adaptive change by preferentially increasing the frequency of beneficial alleles. Stochastic forces—genetic drift, the founder effect, and bottleneck events—randomly alter frequencies, especially in small or newly established populations, often reducing overall genetic variation. Recognising how these mechanisms operate, and being able to quantify their effects, is essential for interpreting evolutionary patterns, managing breeding programmes, and evaluating conservation strategies.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.