investigate the progress of enzyme-catalysed reactions by measuring rates of formation of products using catalase and rates of disappearance of substrate using amylase

Mode of Action of Enzymes – Cambridge International AS & A Level Biology (9700)

Learning Objectives

  • Explain how enzymes accelerate reactions (active site, transition state, lock‑and‑key & induced‑fit, regeneration of the enzyme).
  • Derive the Michaelis–Menten equation and calculate Vmax, Km and kcat.
  • Analyse the effect of temperature, pH, enzyme concentration, substrate concentration and inhibitors on enzyme activity.
  • Distinguish reversible from irreversible inhibition and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of enzyme immobilisation.
  • Design, carry out and evaluate practical investigations:

    • Measuring product formation with catalase.
    • Measuring substrate disappearance with amylase.

  • Interpret kinetic data using linear‑reciprocal (Lineweaver–Burk) plots and recognise sources of error; be aware of alternative linearisations.

1. Enzyme Fundamentals

1.1 What is an Enzyme?

  • Biological catalyst – lowers the activation energy (Ea) without being consumed in the overall reaction.
  • Usually a protein (or a ribozyme) that adopts a specific three‑dimensional conformation.

1.2 Active Site and Transition State

  • Active site: a small pocket containing residues that bind substrate(s) and stabilise the transition state.
  • Binding brings substrates into the correct orientation and reduces the energy required to reach the transition state, thereby increasing the rate of product formation.
  • Key interactions: hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, hydrophobic contacts and, in some enzymes, a catalytic triad (e.g. Ser‑His‑Asp in serine proteases).
  • After product release the enzyme returns to its original form – it is regenerated unchanged and can catalyse further cycles.

1.3 Models of Substrate Binding

ModelKey Idea
Lock‑and‑keyEnzyme and substrate have complementary shapes that fit perfectly without any change in enzyme structure.
Induced‑fitBinding induces a conformational change in the enzyme, optimising the geometry of the active site for catalysis.

1.4 Michaelis–Menten Kinetics

For a simple reversible reaction:

\[

E + S \;\underset{k{-1}}{\stackrel{k{1}}{\rightleftharpoons}}\; ES \;\underset{k{-2}}{\stackrel{k{2}}{\rightleftharpoons}}\; E + P

\]

Assuming the steady‑state (rate of formation of ES = rate of its breakdown) gives the Michaelis–Menten equation:

\[

v = \frac{V{\max}[S]}{K{m} + [S]}

\]

  • Vmax = kcat[E]total – maximum rate when every enzyme molecule is saturated with substrate.
  • Km = (k-1 + k2) / k1 – substrate concentration at which the reaction rate is half of Vmax.
  • kcat (turnover number) – number of substrate molecules converted per enzyme molecule per second.
  • Specific activity – units of activity per milligram of protein; useful when the enzyme preparation is not pure.

1.5 Graphical Determination of Kinetic Parameters

  • Hyperbolic plot of v versus [S] (Michaelis–Menten curve).
  • Lineweaver–Burk plot (double‑reciprocal):

    \[

    \frac{1}{v} = \frac{K{m}}{V{\max}}\frac{1}{[S]} + \frac{1}{V_{\max}}

    \]

    – y‑intercept = 1/Vmax, slope = Km/Vmax.

  • Limitations: gives excessive weight to low‑[S] points and magnifies experimental error.
  • Alternative linearisations (less error‑prone):

    • Eadie‑Hofstee: \(v = -K{m}\,(v/[S]) + V{\max}\)
    • Hanes‑Woolf: \([S]/v = [S]/V{\max} + K{m}/V_{\max}\)

    – Mention these when discussing why the double‑reciprocal method is discouraged for precise work.

2. Factors Affecting Enzyme Activity (Syllabus 3.2)

FactorEffect on RateMolecular Reason
TemperatureRate ↑ up to an optimum, then ↓ sharply.Higher kinetic energy → more effective collisions; above optimum, denaturation disrupts the active‑site geometry.
pHRate ↑ to an optimum pH, then ↓.Alters ionisation of active‑site residues; extreme pH can denature the protein.
Enzyme concentrationRate ↑ linearly (provided substrate is in excess).More enzyme molecules → more active sites available for substrate binding.
Substrate concentrationRate ↑ hyperbolically; approaches Vmax.At high [S] all enzyme molecules are saturated; additional substrate cannot increase the rate.
InhibitorsDecrease rate; pattern depends on type.

  • Competitive – bind to the active site; Vmax unchanged, Km ↑.
  • Non‑competitive – bind elsewhere; Vmax ↓, Km unchanged.
  • Uncompetitive – bind only to the ES complex; both Vmax and Km ↓.

Enzyme immobilisationOften reduces apparent activity but improves stability and re‑usability.Enzyme is fixed on a solid support; diffusion of substrate to the active site can be slower, yet the enzyme is protected from denaturation and can be recovered easily.

2.1 Reversible vs. Irreversible Inhibition

TypeBindingEffect on ActivityTypical Example
ReversibleNon‑covalent (hydrogen bonds, ionic, hydrophobic)Activity can be restored by removing the inhibitor (e.g., dialysis, dilution).Methanol inhibition of alcohol dehydrogenase (competitive)
IrreversibleCovalent modification of active‑site residuesActivity lost permanently; enzyme must be replaced.Organophosphate inhibition of acetylcholinesterase

3. Practical Investigations

3.1 Catalase – Measuring Product Formation (O₂)

3.1.1 Principle

Catalase catalyses the rapid decomposition of hydrogen peroxide:

\[

2\;\mathrm{H2O2}\;\xrightarrow{\text{catalase}}\;2\;\mathrm{H2O}\;+\;\mathrm{O2}\uparrow

\]

3.1.2 Apparatus

ItemPurpose
10 mL test tubesReaction vessels
Gas syringe (or inverted graduated cylinder)Collect evolved O₂
Electronic stopwatchAccurate timing
Fresh potato or liver homogenateSource of catalase
3 % (w/v) H₂O₂ solutionSubstrate
Thermostatic water bath (±0.5 °C)Maintain constant temperature
Pipettes, rubber stopper, thermometerStandard laboratory accessories

3.1.3 Procedure (outline)

  1. Label tubes for the required temperatures (e.g., 10 °C, 25 °C, 37 °C, 50 °C) and a control containing no enzyme.
  2. Add 5 mL of 3 % H₂O₂ to each tube and equilibrate in the water bath for 2 min.
  3. Insert the gas‑collection syringe, add 0.5 mL of the enzyme source, seal immediately and start the stopwatch.
  4. Record the volume of O₂ at 10 s intervals for 1 min (or until the reaction ceases).
  5. Repeat each temperature at least three times for reproducibility.

3.1.4 Data Recording

Time (s)Volume O₂ (mL)
00.0
100.8
201.5
302.1

3.1.5 Calculations & Analysis

  • Calculate the initial rate V (mL s⁻¹) from the slope of the early linear segment (usually the first 30 s).
  • If a quantitative rate in moles s⁻¹ is required, convert volume to moles of O₂ using the ideal‑gas equation \(PV = nRT\) (standard temperature and pressure assumed).
  • Plot temperature versus initial rate to identify the optimum temperature and discuss the decline at higher temperatures as a result of enzyme denaturation.

3.2 Amylase – Measuring Substrate Disappearance (Starch)

3.2.1 Principle

Amylase hydrolyses starch into maltose and glucose:

\[

\text{Starch} + \text{H}_2\text{O} \xrightarrow{\text{amylase}} \text{Maltose} + \text{Glucose}

\]

Residual starch reacts with iodine to give a blue‑black complex; loss of colour indicates substrate consumption.

3.2.2 Apparatus

ItemPurpose
10 mL test tubesReaction vessels
Electronic stopwatchTiming
Iodine solution (0.1 % w/v)Detect residual starch
Spectrophotometer (optional)Measure absorbance at 620 nm
Saliva (or pancreatic extract)Source of amylase
1 % (w/v) starch solutionSubstrate
Buffer solutions (pH 4, 7, 9)Study pH effect
Thermostatic water bathTemperature control

3.2.3 Procedure (outline)

  1. Prepare reaction mixtures containing 5 mL of starch solution and the appropriate buffer; equilibrate at the chosen temperature.
  2. Add 0.5 mL of the amylase source, mix quickly, and start the stopwatch.
  3. At 30 s intervals withdraw 0.5 mL of the reaction mixture and add it to 2 mL of iodine solution in a cuvette.
  4. Record the colour change (qualitative) or measure absorbance at 620 nm (quantitative).
  5. Continue until the colour disappears (A ≈ 0) or for a fixed total time (e.g., 3 min).
  6. Repeat for each pH and temperature, performing at least three replicates per condition.

3.2.4 Data Recording (spectrophotometric example)

Time (s)Absorbance (A620)
00.85
300.62
600.38
900.12
1200.02

3.2.5 Calculations & Analysis

  • Convert absorbance to starch concentration using Beer‑Lambert law \(A = \varepsilon\,l\,[\text{Starch}]\) (ε obtained from a calibration curve).
  • Determine the initial rate of substrate disappearance:

    \[

    v_{-S} = -\frac{\Delta[\text{Starch}]}{\Delta t}

    \]

    using the linear portion of the early time‑course (e.g., 0–60 s).

  • Plot initial rate against substrate concentration for different pH/temperature values to obtain Michaelis–Menten curves; if required, construct Lineweaver–Burk (or alternative) plots to extract Vmax and Km.

4. Data Analysis & Interpretation

  1. Initial rates – draw v versus time; the slope of the early linear region gives the initial rate.
  2. Temperature effect – plot temperature against initial rate; identify the optimum temperature and discuss loss of activity at higher temperatures as denaturation of the enzyme’s secondary/tertiary structure.
  3. pH effect – present a pH‑rate profile; explain the optimum in terms of ionisation of active‑site residues.
  4. Substrate‑concentration study – plot v against [S]; fit the data to the Michaelis–Menten equation (non‑linear regression) or use a Lineweaver–Burk plot to obtain Vmax and Km. Discuss the meaning of each parameter.
  5. Enzyme‑concentration study – keep [S] ≫ Km and vary enzyme amount; expect a linear relationship (v ∝ [E]), confirming that rate depends on the number of active sites available.
  6. Inhibition study (optional) – add a known inhibitor (e.g., acarbose for amylase). Use Lineweaver–Burk plots to distinguish competitive, non‑competitive or uncompetitive inhibition.
  7. Sources of error – timing inaccuracies, temperature fluctuations, incomplete mixing, gas‑loss in the catalase experiment, pipetting errors, and the intrinsic error amplification in double‑reciprocal plots. Suggest improvements such as using a digital data‑logger, pre‑warming reagents, and employing alternative linearisation methods.