Mode of Action of Enzymes – Cambridge International AS & A Level Biology (9700)
Learning Objectives
- Explain how enzymes accelerate reactions (active site, transition state, lock‑and‑key & induced‑fit, regeneration of the enzyme).
- Derive the Michaelis–Menten equation and calculate Vmax, Km and kcat.
- Analyse the effect of temperature, pH, enzyme concentration, substrate concentration and inhibitors on enzyme activity.
- Distinguish reversible from irreversible inhibition and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of enzyme immobilisation.
- Design, carry out and evaluate practical investigations:
- Measuring product formation with catalase.
- Measuring substrate disappearance with amylase.
- Interpret kinetic data using linear‑reciprocal (Lineweaver–Burk) plots and recognise sources of error; be aware of alternative linearisations.
1. Enzyme Fundamentals
1.1 What is an Enzyme?
- Biological catalyst – lowers the activation energy (Ea) without being consumed in the overall reaction.
- Usually a protein (or a ribozyme) that adopts a specific three‑dimensional conformation.
1.2 Active Site and Transition State
- Active site: a small pocket containing residues that bind substrate(s) and stabilise the transition state.
- Binding brings substrates into the correct orientation and reduces the energy required to reach the transition state, thereby increasing the rate of product formation.
- Key interactions: hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, hydrophobic contacts and, in some enzymes, a catalytic triad (e.g. Ser‑His‑Asp in serine proteases).
- After product release the enzyme returns to its original form – it is regenerated unchanged and can catalyse further cycles.
1.3 Models of Substrate Binding
| Model | Key Idea |
|---|
| Lock‑and‑key | Enzyme and substrate have complementary shapes that fit perfectly without any change in enzyme structure. |
| Induced‑fit | Binding induces a conformational change in the enzyme, optimising the geometry of the active site for catalysis. |
1.4 Michaelis–Menten Kinetics
For a simple reversible reaction:
\[
E + S \;\underset{k{-1}}{\stackrel{k{1}}{\rightleftharpoons}}\; ES \;\underset{k{-2}}{\stackrel{k{2}}{\rightleftharpoons}}\; E + P
\]
Assuming the steady‑state (rate of formation of ES = rate of its breakdown) gives the Michaelis–Menten equation:
\[
v = \frac{V{\max}[S]}{K{m} + [S]}
\]
- Vmax = kcat[E]total – maximum rate when every enzyme molecule is saturated with substrate.
- Km = (k-1 + k2) / k1 – substrate concentration at which the reaction rate is half of Vmax.
- kcat (turnover number) – number of substrate molecules converted per enzyme molecule per second.
- Specific activity – units of activity per milligram of protein; useful when the enzyme preparation is not pure.
1.5 Graphical Determination of Kinetic Parameters
- Hyperbolic plot of v versus [S] (Michaelis–Menten curve).
- Lineweaver–Burk plot (double‑reciprocal):
\[
\frac{1}{v} = \frac{K{m}}{V{\max}}\frac{1}{[S]} + \frac{1}{V_{\max}}
\]
– y‑intercept = 1/Vmax, slope = Km/Vmax.
- Limitations: gives excessive weight to low‑[S] points and magnifies experimental error.
- Alternative linearisations (less error‑prone):
- Eadie‑Hofstee: \(v = -K{m}\,(v/[S]) + V{\max}\)
- Hanes‑Woolf: \([S]/v = [S]/V{\max} + K{m}/V_{\max}\)
– Mention these when discussing why the double‑reciprocal method is discouraged for precise work.
2. Factors Affecting Enzyme Activity (Syllabus 3.2)
| Factor | Effect on Rate | Molecular Reason |
|---|
| Temperature | Rate ↑ up to an optimum, then ↓ sharply. | Higher kinetic energy → more effective collisions; above optimum, denaturation disrupts the active‑site geometry. |
| pH | Rate ↑ to an optimum pH, then ↓. | Alters ionisation of active‑site residues; extreme pH can denature the protein. |
| Enzyme concentration | Rate ↑ linearly (provided substrate is in excess). | More enzyme molecules → more active sites available for substrate binding. |
| Substrate concentration | Rate ↑ hyperbolically; approaches Vmax. | At high [S] all enzyme molecules are saturated; additional substrate cannot increase the rate. |
| Inhibitors | Decrease rate; pattern depends on type. | - Competitive – bind to the active site; Vmax unchanged, Km ↑.
- Non‑competitive – bind elsewhere; Vmax ↓, Km unchanged.
- Uncompetitive – bind only to the ES complex; both Vmax and Km ↓.
|
| Enzyme immobilisation | Often reduces apparent activity but improves stability and re‑usability. | Enzyme is fixed on a solid support; diffusion of substrate to the active site can be slower, yet the enzyme is protected from denaturation and can be recovered easily. |
2.1 Reversible vs. Irreversible Inhibition
| Type | Binding | Effect on Activity | Typical Example |
|---|
| Reversible | Non‑covalent (hydrogen bonds, ionic, hydrophobic) | Activity can be restored by removing the inhibitor (e.g., dialysis, dilution). | Methanol inhibition of alcohol dehydrogenase (competitive) |
| Irreversible | Covalent modification of active‑site residues | Activity lost permanently; enzyme must be replaced. | Organophosphate inhibition of acetylcholinesterase |
3. Practical Investigations
3.1 Catalase – Measuring Product Formation (O₂)
3.1.1 Principle
Catalase catalyses the rapid decomposition of hydrogen peroxide:
\[
2\;\mathrm{H2O2}\;\xrightarrow{\text{catalase}}\;2\;\mathrm{H2O}\;+\;\mathrm{O2}\uparrow
\]
3.1.2 Apparatus
| Item | Purpose |
|---|
| 10 mL test tubes | Reaction vessels |
| Gas syringe (or inverted graduated cylinder) | Collect evolved O₂ |
| Electronic stopwatch | Accurate timing |
| Fresh potato or liver homogenate | Source of catalase |
| 3 % (w/v) H₂O₂ solution | Substrate |
| Thermostatic water bath (±0.5 °C) | Maintain constant temperature |
| Pipettes, rubber stopper, thermometer | Standard laboratory accessories |
3.1.3 Procedure (outline)
- Label tubes for the required temperatures (e.g., 10 °C, 25 °C, 37 °C, 50 °C) and a control containing no enzyme.
- Add 5 mL of 3 % H₂O₂ to each tube and equilibrate in the water bath for 2 min.
- Insert the gas‑collection syringe, add 0.5 mL of the enzyme source, seal immediately and start the stopwatch.
- Record the volume of O₂ at 10 s intervals for 1 min (or until the reaction ceases).
- Repeat each temperature at least three times for reproducibility.
3.1.4 Data Recording
| Time (s) | Volume O₂ (mL) |
|---|
| 0 | 0.0 |
| 10 | 0.8 |
| 20 | 1.5 |
| 30 | 2.1 |
| … | … |
3.1.5 Calculations & Analysis
- Calculate the initial rate V (mL s⁻¹) from the slope of the early linear segment (usually the first 30 s).
- If a quantitative rate in moles s⁻¹ is required, convert volume to moles of O₂ using the ideal‑gas equation \(PV = nRT\) (standard temperature and pressure assumed).
- Plot temperature versus initial rate to identify the optimum temperature and discuss the decline at higher temperatures as a result of enzyme denaturation.
3.2 Amylase – Measuring Substrate Disappearance (Starch)
3.2.1 Principle
Amylase hydrolyses starch into maltose and glucose:
\[
\text{Starch} + \text{H}_2\text{O} \xrightarrow{\text{amylase}} \text{Maltose} + \text{Glucose}
\]
Residual starch reacts with iodine to give a blue‑black complex; loss of colour indicates substrate consumption.
3.2.2 Apparatus
| Item | Purpose |
|---|
| 10 mL test tubes | Reaction vessels |
| Electronic stopwatch | Timing |
| Iodine solution (0.1 % w/v) | Detect residual starch |
| Spectrophotometer (optional) | Measure absorbance at 620 nm |
| Saliva (or pancreatic extract) | Source of amylase |
| 1 % (w/v) starch solution | Substrate |
| Buffer solutions (pH 4, 7, 9) | Study pH effect |
| Thermostatic water bath | Temperature control |
3.2.3 Procedure (outline)
- Prepare reaction mixtures containing 5 mL of starch solution and the appropriate buffer; equilibrate at the chosen temperature.
- Add 0.5 mL of the amylase source, mix quickly, and start the stopwatch.
- At 30 s intervals withdraw 0.5 mL of the reaction mixture and add it to 2 mL of iodine solution in a cuvette.
- Record the colour change (qualitative) or measure absorbance at 620 nm (quantitative).
- Continue until the colour disappears (A ≈ 0) or for a fixed total time (e.g., 3 min).
- Repeat for each pH and temperature, performing at least three replicates per condition.
3.2.4 Data Recording (spectrophotometric example)
| Time (s) | Absorbance (A620) |
|---|
| 0 | 0.85 |
| 30 | 0.62 |
| 60 | 0.38 |
| 90 | 0.12 |
| 120 | 0.02 |
3.2.5 Calculations & Analysis
- Convert absorbance to starch concentration using Beer‑Lambert law \(A = \varepsilon\,l\,[\text{Starch}]\) (ε obtained from a calibration curve).
- Determine the initial rate of substrate disappearance:
\[
v_{-S} = -\frac{\Delta[\text{Starch}]}{\Delta t}
\]
using the linear portion of the early time‑course (e.g., 0–60 s).
- Plot initial rate against substrate concentration for different pH/temperature values to obtain Michaelis–Menten curves; if required, construct Lineweaver–Burk (or alternative) plots to extract Vmax and Km.
4. Data Analysis & Interpretation
- Initial rates – draw v versus time; the slope of the early linear region gives the initial rate.
- Temperature effect – plot temperature against initial rate; identify the optimum temperature and discuss loss of activity at higher temperatures as denaturation of the enzyme’s secondary/tertiary structure.
- pH effect – present a pH‑rate profile; explain the optimum in terms of ionisation of active‑site residues.
- Substrate‑concentration study – plot v against [S]; fit the data to the Michaelis–Menten equation (non‑linear regression) or use a Lineweaver–Burk plot to obtain Vmax and Km. Discuss the meaning of each parameter.
- Enzyme‑concentration study – keep [S] ≫ Km and vary enzyme amount; expect a linear relationship (v ∝ [E]), confirming that rate depends on the number of active sites available.
- Inhibition study (optional) – add a known inhibitor (e.g., acarbose for amylase). Use Lineweaver–Burk plots to distinguish competitive, non‑competitive or uncompetitive inhibition.
- Sources of error – timing inaccuracies, temperature fluctuations, incomplete mixing, gas‑loss in the catalase experiment, pipetting errors, and the intrinsic error amplification in double‑reciprocal plots. Suggest improvements such as using a digital data‑logger, pre‑warming reagents, and employing alternative linearisation methods.