| Indicator | What it measures | How it is calculated | Key strengths | Key limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real GDP per head | Average economic output (in real terms) per person. | Real GDP ÷ mid‑year population. Growth % = [(GDP pct – GDP pct‑1) ÷ GDP pct‑1] × 100 | Easy to obtain; shows economic growth; widely published. | Ignores income distribution, non‑market activities, health, education and environmental quality. |
| Human Development Index (HDI) | Composite measure of health, education and standard of living. | Geometric mean of three normalised sub‑indices (see Section 4). | Combines three essential dimensions; enables cross‑country comparison of “human” development. | Only three dimensions; data quality varies; does not capture inequality, gender gaps or sustainability. |
| Inequality‑adjusted HDI (IHDI) | HDI adjusted for inequality in each dimension. | Same formula as HDI but each sub‑index is reduced by the inequality penalty (UNDP methodology). | Shows how inequality lowers human development. | More complex; still limited to three dimensions. |
| Gini coefficient | Degree of income inequality. | Area between the Lorenz curve and the line of equality, expressed as a percentage (0–100). | Simple single‑number summary of distribution. | Does not indicate who is poor; insensitive to changes at the extremes. |
Real GDP per head = Real Gross Domestic Product (base‑year prices) ÷ mid‑year population.
Growth rate (percentage change):
\$\text{Growth %} = \frac{\text{GDP pc}{t} - \text{GDP pc}{t-1}}{\text{GDP pc}_{t-1}} \times 100\$
When the syllabus asks you to evaluate which indicator is more appropriate, consider the purpose of the analysis:
The HDI is a dimensionless index ranging from 0 (lowest human development) to 1 (highest). It is the geometric mean of three normalised sub‑indices:
\$\text{HDI}= \bigl(I{\text{health}} \times I{\text{education}} \times I_{\text{income}}\bigr)^{\frac13}\$
| Dimension | Indicator | Formula for sub‑index | Reference minimum | Reference maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health | Life expectancy at birth (years) | \$I_{\text{health}}=\frac{\text{LE}-20}{85-20}\$ | 20 years | 85 years |
| Education | Mean years of schooling (MYS) | \$\frac{\text{MYS}}{15}\$ | 0 years | 15 years |
| Expected years of schooling (EYS) | \$\frac{\text{EYS}}{18}\$ | 0 years | 18 years | |
| Combined education index | \$I_{\text{education}}=\frac12\left(\frac{\text{MYS}}{15}+\frac{\text{EYS}}{18}\right)\$ | — | — | |
| Standard of living | GNI per capita (PPP US$) | \$I{\text{income}}=\frac{\ln(\text{GNI}{pc})-\ln(100)}{\ln(75\,000)-\ln(100)}\$ | $100 | $75 000 |
Country X (2023 data):
Step 1 – Health index
\$I_{\text{health}}=\frac{72-20}{85-20}= \frac{52}{65}=0.80\$
Step 2 – Education index
\$I_{\text{education}}=\frac12\left(\frac{9}{15}+\frac{12}{18}\right)=\frac12\left(0.60+0.67\right)=0.635\$
Step 3 – Income index
\$\$I_{\text{income}}=\frac{\ln(15\,000)-\ln(100)}{\ln(75\,000)-\ln(100)}
=\frac{9.62-4.61}{11.23-4.61}=0.757\$\$
Step 4 – HDI (geometric mean)
\$\text{HDI}= (0.80 \times 0.635 \times 0.757)^{1/3}= (0.384)^{1/3}=0.73\$
Interpretation: 0.73 → high human development (UNDP classification).
Suppose Country Y’s HDI rose from 0.58 (2010) to 0.68 (2020). Possible reasons for the improvement:
When analysing trends, always link the change to the underlying component(s) that are most likely to have moved.
| Advantages | Disadvantages / Limitations |
|---|---|
|
|
Although the HDI itself does not contain an environmental or sustainability component, the syllabus expects you to recognise this gap. Mention that the UNDP now publishes the Human Development Index – Sustainable Development (HDI‑SD) and the Inequality‑adjusted HDI (IHDI)**, both of which attempt to incorporate additional dimensions such as ecological footprint or inequality.
The UNDP’s Inequality‑adjusted HDI (IHDI) reduces each sub‑index by the inequality penalty. A country with a high HDI but a high Gini will have a noticeably lower IHDI, highlighting the importance of distribution when assessing living standards.
| Policy | How it works | Potential strengths | Potential weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promoting sustained economic growth | Increase real GDP per head → more resources for health, education and social services. | Creates jobs; raises incomes. | Growth may be uneven; can increase inequality if benefits accrue to a small elite. |
| Improving education & health services | Boosts the HDI’s education and health components; improves human capital. | Long‑term reduction in poverty; raises productivity. | Requires substantial public spending; benefits realised over many years. |
| Progressive taxation & social welfare transfers | Redistributes income, lowering the Gini coefficient. | Directly reduces inequality; provides safety net. | May discourage investment if tax rates are too high; fiscal sustainability concerns. |
| Minimum wage legislation | Guarantees a floor for earnings, raising low‑income workers’ real wages. | Reduces absolute poverty; improves living standards. | Potential to increase unemployment if set above market equilibrium. |
The “optimum” population is the size at which a country can provide a satisfactory standard of living to all its citizens. It depends on:
In practice the optimum is a theoretical benchmark; most countries aim to keep growth at a level that does not outstrip their capacity to improve living standards.
| Aspect | Impact of a large, young population | Impact of an ageing population |
|---|---|---|
| Labour supply | Potential for a “demographic dividend” if jobs are created. | Labour force shrinks; higher dependency ratio. |
| Demand for services | Greater need for education, child health, and entry‑level jobs. | Higher demand for health care, pensions, and age‑related services. |
| Pressure on resources | Risk of overcrowding, strain on housing, water and food supplies. | Lower pressure on natural resources but higher per‑capita consumption of some services. |
| Effect on GDP pc and HDI | If growth keeps pace, GDP pc can rise and HDI improves; if not, living standards fall. | GDP pc may rise (fewer workers share the output) but health and education components of HDI may improve, while the income component may stagnate. |
Country Z (2022):
CBR = (144 000 ÷ 12 000 000) × 1 000 = 12 per 1 000
CDR = (84 000 ÷ 12 000 000) × 1 000 = 7 per 1 000
Natural increase = 12 – 7 = 5 per 1 000
Net migration = (30 000 – 10 000) ÷ 12 000 000 × 1 000 = 1.7 per 1 000
Population growth rate ≈ 5 + 1.7 = 6.7 per 1 000 (≈ 0.67 %).
| Aspect | Real GDP per head | HDI (or IHDI) | When to use which? |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it measures | Average economic output (money value) per person. | Health, education and income (human development); IHDI also includes inequality. | Use GDP pc when the question focuses on production, investment or fiscal capacity. Use HDI/IHDI when the focus is on overall well‑being. |
| Data required | GDP, population. | Life expectancy, mean & expected years of schooling, GNI‑PPP; IHDI adds Gini data. | GDP pc data are available for almost every country; HDI data are published annually by UNDP. |
| Strengths | Simple, tracks growth, widely comparable. | Broad, captures non‑economic dimensions; IHDI shows effect of inequality. | Combine both for a fuller picture – e.g., a high GDP pc but low HDI suggests growth is not reaching people. |
| Limitations | Ignores distribution, health, education, environment. | Only three dimensions; data quality issues; IHDI still omits sustainability. | Explain limitations when evaluating policies (e.g., “raising GDP pc alone will not improve health outcomes if the health system is weak”). |
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.