interpret and construct genetic diagrams, including Punnett squares, to explain and predict the results of dihybrid crosses that involve autosomal linkage and epistasis (knowledge of the expected ratios for different types of epistasis is not expecte
Cambridge International AS & A Level Biology (9700) – Genetics and Core Cellular Concepts
Learning Objective
Interpret and construct genetic diagrams (including Punnett squares) to explain and predict the results of dihybrid crosses that involve autosomal linkage and epistasis. Integrate this knowledge with the cellular and molecular foundations required by the Cambridge syllabus.
Assessment Objectives (AO)
AO1 – Knowledge & Understanding: Recall key facts, terminology and processes in genetics, cell structure, biochemistry and molecular biology.
AO2 – Application: Use knowledge to solve problems, construct genetic diagrams and interpret experimental data.
AO3 – Analysis & Evaluation: Analyse results, evaluate experimental design and discuss the significance of genetic concepts in health and biotechnology.
Order of genes: the most frequent parental types (AB and ab) indicate that A and B are in coupling phase; the less frequent recombinants (Ab, aB) confirm the order A — B.
Result:A and B are 17 cM apart on the same chromosome.
3.6 Epistasis (Interaction Between Genes)
Epistasis occurs when the phenotype produced by one gene masks or modifies the expression of another gene. The exam does not require memorising the classic ratios, but you must be able to predict the phenotypic classes after the genotype has been worked out.
Type of epistasis
Genetic relationship
Typical phenotypic pattern (F₂)
Recessive epistasis
aa masks B locus
9 : 3 : 4
Dominant epistasis
A‑ (dominant) masks b locus
12 : 3 : 1
Duplicate recessive epistasis
Either gene can produce the same trait; both must be aa bb to lose it
15 : 1
Duplicate dominant epistasis
Either dominant allele produces the same phenotype
15 : 1 (inverse)
Complementary (recessive) epistasis
Both genes required for a phenotype
9 : 7
3.7 Critical‑Thinking Prompt (AO3)
“A measured recombination frequency between two genes is 12 %, but the published genetic map places them 8 cM apart. Discuss possible reasons for this discrepancy and how you would design an experiment to obtain a more accurate estimate.”
Experimental design: increase progeny number, use molecular markers, perform reciprocal crosses, analyse male vs. female meioses separately.
4. Constructing Genetic Diagrams
4.1 General Procedure for a Punnett Square (AO2)
Write the parental genotypes.
Determine all possible gametes each parent can produce (consider segregation, independent assortment, linkage, and recombination frequency).
Place one parent’s gametes across the top, the other’s down the side.
Fill each cell with the combined genotype formed by the intersecting gametes.
Convert each genotype to a phenotype using dominance and any epistatic rules.
Count the number of each phenotypic class and express as a ratio or percentage.
4.2 Example: Dihybrid Cross with Linked Genes and Recessive Epistasis (RF = 10 %)
Scenario: In pea plants, A (seed colour: A = yellow, a = green) and B (seed shape: B = round, b = wrinkled) are linked on chromosome 5 (RF = 10 %). The allele a is recessive epistatic to B (aa → green seeds irrespective of shape).
Parental cross: AABB × aabb → F₁ genotype AaBb (heterozygous for both linked genes).
Gamete frequencies from F₁ (using RF = 10 %):
Parental: AB = 45 %, ab = 45 %.
Recombinant: Ab = 5 %, aB = 5 %.
Construct a 4 × 4 Punnett square (scaled to 1000 offspring for clarity). The table shows expected numbers of each genotype and the phenotype after applying the epistatic rule.
Maternal \ Paternal
AB (450)
Ab (50)
aB (50)
ab (450)
AB (450)
AABB (202.5) → Yellow, round
AABb (22.5) → Yellow, round
AaBB (22.5) → Yellow, round
AaBb (202.5) → Yellow, round
Ab (50)
AABb (22.5) → Yellow, round
AAbb (2.5) → Yellow, wrinkled
AaBb (2.5) → Yellow, round
Aabb (22.5) → Yellow, wrinkled
aB (50)
AaBB (22.5) → Yellow, round
AaBb (2.5) → Yellow, round
aaBB (2.5) → Green, any shape
aaBb (22.5) → Green, any shape
ab (450)
AaBb (202.5) → Yellow, round
Aabb (22.5) → Yellow, wrinkled
aaBb (22.5) → Green, any shape
aabb (202.5) → Green, any shape
Phenotypic percentages (rounded):
Phenotype
Genotypic basis
Expected % (F₂)
Yellow, round
A‑B‑ (excluding aa)
≈ 40 %
Yellow, wrinkled
A‑bb (excluding aa)
≈ 10 %
Green (any shape)
aa‑‑
≈ 50 %
4.3 Flowchart for Applying Epistasis
Step‑wise conversion of a combined genotype (e.g., AaBb) to a phenotype when an epistatic relationship is present.
Cross:CcDd × ccdd where C (purple > white, complete dominance) and D (flower length: DD = long, Dd = intermediate, dd = short; incomplete dominance).
List the gametes produced by each parent.
Construct a 2 × 4 Punnett square.
Give the phenotypic ratio in the F₂ generation.
5.2 Question 2 – Linked Genes, Test‑Cross and Mapping
A plant heterozygous for two linked genes (R r S s) is test‑crossed with a homozygous recessive (rr ss). The offspring numbers are: RS = 310, rs = 300, Rs = 90, rS = 100.
Calculate the recombination frequency and map distance.
State the most likely order of the genes on the chromosome.
Predict the phenotypic classes expected if the heterozygote were crossed with a plant of genotype RrSs (assume the same RF).
5.3 Question 3 – Epistasis with Linked Genes
In corn, kernel colour (Y = yellow, y = white) and kernel texture (R = rough, r = smooth) are linked (RF = 15 %). The allele y is recessive epistatic to texture (yy → white regardless of R/r). A heterozygote YyRr is crossed with a double‑recessive yyrr. Construct the Punnett square, calculate the expected phenotypic percentages, and comment on how the linkage alters the classic 9 : 3 : 4 ratio for recessive epistasis.
6. Linking Genetics to Cellular Foundations (Integration Note)
Accurate DNA replication (Block 6) and faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis (Block 5) are prerequisites for the inheritance patterns described in Section 3. Errors in replication (e.g., polymerase proofreading defects) or in spindle checkpoint control can generate mutations or aneuploidy that alter genotype frequencies in a population. Moreover, the cell membrane’s role in transporting mutagens or gene‑editing reagents provides a direct connection between membrane biology and the manipulation of genetic traits in biotechnology.
Support e-Consult Kenya
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources,
past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.