IGCSE Economics 0455 – Government and the Macro‑economy: Supply‑side Policy
Government and the Macro‑economy – Supply‑side Policy
1. Why focus on supply‑side policy?
Supply‑side policies aim to increase the productive capacity of an economy. By improving the quantity and quality of factors of production, they shift the long‑run aggregate supply (LRAS) curve to the right, helping the government achieve its macro‑economic objectives.
2. Main macro‑economic aims
Economic growth (increase in real GDP)
Low unemployment
Price stability (low inflation)
External balance (improved balance of payments)
Equitable distribution of income (where possible)
3. Types of supply‑side policy measures
3.1 Incentive‑based measures
Tax cuts – lower corporation tax, income tax or capital gains tax to increase after‑tax profit and encourage investment.
Subsidies – direct financial support for research and development (R&D) or for specific industries.
Lower the natural rate of unemployment by improving skills and labour‑market flexibility.
Reduce cost‑push inflation as production becomes more efficient.
Improve the current account by increasing export competitiveness.
5. Potential drawbacks and limitations
Time lag – benefits may take years to materialise.
Distributional effects – tax cuts may favour higher‑income groups.
Risk of under‑investment in public services if privatisation is excessive.
Possible increase in income inequality if education and training are not widely accessible.
6. Summary table of key supply‑side policies
Policy measure
Intended effect on LRAS
Primary macro‑economic aim supported
Possible side‑effects
Corporation‑tax reduction
Increases after‑tax profit → more investment → LRAS shifts right
Growth, lower unemployment
Reduced fiscal revenue, may widen income gap
Education & training programmes
Improves labour productivity → LRAS shifts right
Growth, low unemployment
High upfront cost, benefits realised long‑term
Privatisation of state enterprises
Increases efficiency and competition → LRAS shifts right
Growth, price stability
Job losses, possible monopoly formation if not regulated
Deregulation (e.g., planning, licensing)
Reduces business costs → LRAS shifts right
Growth, lower unemployment
Potential environmental or safety risks
Infrastructure investment (roads, broadband)
Reduces transport & transaction costs → LRAS shifts right
Growth, external balance
Large public spending, possible debt increase
7. Diagrammatic representation
Suggested diagram: LRAS curve shifting right as a result of supply‑side policies, illustrating the movement from potential output \$Y{P0}\$ to \$Y{P1}\$ with a lower price level \$P_1\$.
8. Example of a LaTeX expression for LRAS shift
Initial long‑run equilibrium: \$Y = YP,\; P = P0\$
After effective supply‑side policies: \$Y = YP',\; P = P1 \quad\text{with}\; YP' > YP \text{ and } P1 < P0\$
9. Review questions
Explain how a reduction in corporation tax can lead to lower unemployment.
Discuss two possible negative side‑effects of privatising state‑owned enterprises.
Using a diagram, illustrate the impact of increased investment in education on the LRAS curve.
Evaluate why supply‑side policies may be less effective in the short run compared with demand‑side measures.