understand that fluctuations in count rate provide evidence for the random nature of radioactive decay

Published by Patrick Mutisya · 14 days ago

Cambridge A-Level Physics 9702 – Radioactive Decay

Radioactive Decay

Learning Objective

Students will understand that fluctuations in the measured count rate provide direct evidence for the random (stochastic) nature of radioactive decay.

Key Concepts

  • Radioactive nuclei decay spontaneously and independently.
  • The probability that a given nucleus decays in a short time interval \$dt\$ is proportional to \$dt\$.
  • The number of decays recorded in a fixed time interval follows a Poisson distribution.
  • Statistical fluctuations become relatively smaller as the count rate increases.

Mathematical Description

The activity \$A(t)\$ of a sample containing \$N(t)\$ undecayed nuclei is

\$\$

A(t)=\lambda N(t)

\$\$

where \$\lambda\$ is the decay constant. The number of nuclei obeys the exponential law

\$\$

N(t)=N_0 e^{-\lambda t}

\$\$

and the expected number of counts \$ \langle n \rangle \$ in a measuring interval \$\Delta t\$ is

\$\$

\langle n \rangle = A(t)\,\Delta t = \lambda N(t)\,\Delta t .

\$\$

Statistical Fluctuations

For a Poisson process the variance equals the mean:

\$\$

\sigma^2 = \langle n \rangle ,\qquad \sigma = \sqrt{\langle n \rangle } .

\$\$

Consequently the relative standard deviation is

\$\$

\frac{\sigma}{\langle n \rangle } = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\langle n \rangle }} .

\$\$

This relationship predicts larger fractional fluctuations for low count rates and smaller fractional fluctuations for high count rates.

Experimental Demonstration

  1. Set up a Geiger‑Müller tube connected to a counter.
  2. Place a weak radioactive source at a fixed distance from the detector.
  3. Record the number of counts \$n_i\$ in successive equal time intervals (e.g., 10 s each) for a total of \$N\$ intervals.
  4. Calculate the mean count \$\langle n \rangle = \frac{1}{N}\sum{i=1}^{N} ni\$ and the standard deviation \$\sigma\$.
  5. Compare the measured \$\sigma\$ with the Poisson prediction \$\sqrt{\langle n \rangle }\$.

Sample Data Table

Interval (s)Counts \$n_i\$
112
29
315
411
513
610
714
812
98
1013

For the data above, \$\langle n \rangle = 11.7\$ and \$\sigma{\text{meas}} \approx 2.1\$, while the Poisson prediction gives \$\sigma{\text{Poisson}} = \sqrt{11.7} \approx 3.4\$. The discrepancy can be discussed in terms of detector efficiency, background radiation, and finite counting time.

Interpretation

  • The random nature of decay means that each nucleus has a fixed probability per unit time to decay, independent of the behaviour of other nuclei.
  • The observed spread of counts around the mean is not due to experimental error alone; it is an intrinsic statistical property of the decay process.
  • Increasing the counting time or using a stronger source reduces the relative fluctuation, illustrating the \$1/\sqrt{N}\$ dependence.

Suggested Classroom Activity

Students simulate radioactive decay using a computer program that generates random numbers. By varying the number of simulated nuclei, they can observe how the distribution of counts approaches a smooth exponential curve as the sample size grows, reinforcing the connection between randomness and macroscopic regularities.

Suggested diagram: A schematic of a Geiger‑Müller tube with a radioactive source, showing the detection of individual decay events as discrete pulses on a counter display.

Key Take‑aways

  • Radioactive decay is a fundamentally random process.
  • Count‑rate fluctuations follow a Poisson distribution, with variance equal to the mean.
  • Statistical analysis of count data provides quantitative evidence for the stochastic nature of decay.
  • Understanding these fluctuations is essential for interpreting experimental results and for applications such as radiation safety and nuclear medicine.