Business applications (inventory, sales, payroll, customer relationship management).
Web applications that require dynamic data handling.
Educational and research databases with complex queries.
Any situation where data consistency, security and scalability are important.
Advantages
Efficient handling of large data sets; queries are optimized.
Data redundancy is reduced through normalization.
Strong data integrity and consistency enforced by constraints.
Multi‑user access with transaction control (ACID properties).
Powerful reporting and analysis capabilities.
Disadvantages
More complex to design, implement and maintain.
Requires dedicated DBMS software and hardware resources.
Steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with SQL.
Initial setup time and cost can be higher than flat‑file solutions.
3. Comparison of Flat‑File and Relational Databases
Aspect
Flat‑File Database
Relational Database
Structure
Single file, simple rows and columns
Multiple related tables with defined relationships
Data Size Handling
Suitable for small data sets
Designed for large, complex data sets
Data Integrity
Limited; relies on manual checks
Enforced by keys, constraints, and transactions
Query Capability
Basic searching; often external tools required
Powerful SQL queries, joins, aggregations
Redundancy
High – duplicate data common
Low – normalization reduces duplication
Multi‑User Access
Typically single‑user; concurrency issues
Supports concurrent users with transaction control
Setup & Maintenance
Simple; minimal software needed
Complex; requires DBMS and skilled administration
Portability
Highly portable across platforms
Portability depends on DBMS compatibility
4. Summary
Flat‑file databases are straightforward, low‑cost solutions ideal for very small or temporary data storage, but they lack the robustness required for larger, multi‑user environments. Relational databases, while more complex and resource‑intensive, provide powerful tools for maintaining data integrity, handling large volumes of information, and supporting sophisticated queries. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each type enables ICT practitioners to select the most appropriate system for a given application.
Suggested diagram: Comparison of data flow in a flat‑file system versus a relational database with tables and relationships.