describe the classification of organisms in the Eukarya domain into the taxonomic hierarchy of kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus and species
Objective
To describe how organisms in the domain Eukarya are classified into the hierarchical ranks of kingdom, phylum (or division), class, order, family, genus and species, and to connect classification with biodiversity, conservation, species concepts, natural selection, and modern genetic technologies – as required by the Cambridge International AS & A Level Biology (9700) syllabus.
Key Concepts (Syllabus Links)
Cells as the basic unit of life – all eukaryotes possess membrane‑bound organelles and a nucleus.
Biochemical processes & DNA – molecular markers (e.g., COI, rbcL) are used to infer relationships and delimit species.
Natural selection & evolution – adaptive radiation and speciation generate the diversity that classification seeks to organise.
Organisms in their environment – biodiversity, ecosystem services and human impacts are central to conservation.
Observation & experiment – practical activities such as constructing dichotomous keys develop AO2 and AO3 skills.
1. The Taxonomic Hierarchy
The Linnaean system is a nested hierarchy: each successive rank groups organisms that share a greater number of characters and a more recent common ancestor.
Rank
Relative Scope
Example (Human)
Domain
Broadest grouping of cells
Eukarya
Kingdom
Major lineages of eukaryotes
Animalia
Phylum / Division
Body‑plan or major structural features
Chordata
Class
More specific body‑plan traits
Mammalia
Order
Shared adaptations
Primates
Family
Close morphological similarity
Hominidae
Genus
Very close evolutionary relationship
Homo
Species
Potential to interbreed and produce fertile offspring (or equivalent genetic cohesion)
Homo sapiens
2. Kingdoms Within the Domain Eukarya
Current consensus recognises six kingdoms (plus the green lineage often treated as a separate kingdom). The table summarises the principal distinguishing features, followed by a concise description and a representative species for each kingdom.
Kingdom
Cellular Organisation
Nutrition
Cell‑Wall Composition
Typical Storage Product
Characteristic Organelle / Feature
Protista
Unicellular or simple multicellular
Autotrophic, heterotrophic or mixotrophic
Often absent; some have cellulose or silica
Starch, lipids or glycogen (varies)
Primary or secondary plastids, flagella, contractile vacuole
Fungi
Filamentous multicellular (mycelium) or unicellular (yeasts)
Heterotrophic absorbers
Chitin
Glycogen
Hyphae, sporangia, chitinous cell wall
Plantae
Multicellular
Primarily autotrophic (photosynthetic)
Cellulose
Starch
Primary chloroplasts, alternation of generations
Chromista
Mostly multicellular algae; some unicellular
Photosynthetic (chlorophyll c) or heterotrophic
Cellulose (some have silica plates)
Lipids, sometimes chrysolaminarin
Secondary plastids (derived from red algae), flagellated zoospores
Animalia
Multicellular
Heterotrophic (ingestive)
Absent
Glycogen
True tissues, nervous system, lack of cell walls
Archaeplastida (green lineage)
Multicellular (land plants) and unicellular (green algae)
Autotrophic (primary plastids)
Cellulose
Starch
Primary chloroplasts directly from cyanobacterial endosymbiosis
Brief Descriptions & Representative Species
Protista – Plasmodium falciparum: A malaria parasite; unicellular, heterotrophic, no cell wall, possesses a remnant apicoplast.
6. Phylogenetics, Cladistics and Molecular Systematics
Cladogram – a branching diagram that shows hypothesised evolutionary relationships based on shared derived characters (synapomorphies).
Monophyly – a group containing an ancestor and all its descendants; modern taxonomy strives to recognise only monophyletic taxa.
Parsimony principle – the simplest tree (fewest evolutionary changes) is preferred, though likelihood and Bayesian methods are also used.
Molecular markers – DNA sequences such as COI (animals), rbcL & matK (plants), 18S rRNA (protists) provide characters for constructing robust phylogenies.
Interpreting a cladogram – locate the root, identify synapomorphies at each node, determine sister‑group relationships, and assess monophyly of taxa.
Example Cladogram (simplified)
Relationships among the six eukaryotic kingdoms. Highlighted nodes indicate monophyletic groups such as Plantae + Chromista (the “SAR+Plantae” clade).
7. Genetic Technology – Linking DNA to Modern Classification
After studying traditional taxonomy, the syllabus expects students to understand how genetic tools refine classification.
DNA barcoding – short, standardised gene regions (COI for animals, rbcL/matK for plants, ITS for fungi) are sequenced and compared against reference databases to identify species.
Phylogenomics – analysis of hundreds to thousands of loci (or whole genomes) provides high‑resolution trees, revealing cryptic species and deep divergences.
Population genetics – measures of genetic diversity (e.g., heterozygosity, F_ST) inform the Biological Species Concept and help assess the viability of small or fragmented populations.
Practical application – DNA barcoding is routinely used in wildlife forensics, monitoring of trade in endangered species, and rapid assessment of environmental DNA (eDNA) samples.
8. Natural Selection, Speciation and the Origin of Taxa
Classification reflects evolutionary history. Adaptive radiation, driven by natural selection, generates the diversity that taxonomists organise.
When a lineage colonises a new environment, divergent selection can lead to the evolution of distinct morphological, ecological, and genetic traits – eventually producing new species (speciation).
Examples of adaptive radiation relevant to the syllabus:
Darwin’s finches (Aves) – beak morphology linked to feeding niche.
Lake Malawi cichlids (Actinopterygii) – colour patterns and mating behaviour.
Land plants on isolated islands (e.g., Hawaiian silverswords) – growth form and pollination syndromes.
These processes explain why taxa at higher ranks (order, family) share broad adaptations, while lower ranks (genus, species) display finer, often ecologically driven differences.
9. Example Classifications – From Domain to Species
Two contrasting examples illustrate the hierarchy across kingdoms, with additional representatives to meet the syllabus requirement for a “wide range of organisms.”
9.1. Animal Example – House Mouse (Mus musculus)
Domain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Rodentia
Family: Muridae
Genus: Mus
Species: Mus musculus
9.2. Plant Example – Common Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)
Domain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Plantae
Phylum (Division): Magnoliophyta (Angiosperms)
Class: Magnoliopsida (Dicotyledons)
Order: Asterales
Family: Asteraceae
Genus: Helianthus
Species: Helianthus annuus
9.3. Protist Example – Malaria Parasite (Plasmodium falciparum)
Domain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Protista
Phylum: Apicomplexa
Class: Aconoidasida
Order: Haemosporida
Family: Plasmodiidae
Genus: Plasmodium
Species: Plasmodium falciparum
9.4. Fungal Example – Baker’s Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
Domain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Fungi
Phylum: Ascomycota
Class: Saccharomycetes
Order: Saccharomycetales
Family: Saccharomycetaceae
Genus: Saccharomyces
Species: Saccharomyces cerevisiae
9.5. Chromist Example – Brown Alga (Laminaria digitata)
Domain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Chromista
Phylum: Phaeophyta
Class: Phaeophyceae
Order: Laminariales
Family: Laminariaceae
Genus: Laminaria
Species: Laminaria digitata
9.6. Green Algal Example – Flagellate (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii)
Domain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Archaeplastida (green lineage)
Phylum: Chlorophyta
Class: Chlorophyceae
Order: Chlamydomonadales
Family: Chlamydomonadaceae
Genus: Chlamydomonas
Species: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
10. Binomial Nomenclature
Scientific names follow a strict format:
Italicised, with the genus capitalised and the specific epithet in lower case (e.g., Homo sapiens).
Often followed by the authority and year of publication (e.g., Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758).
Subspecies, when recognised, are added as a third italicised term (e.g., Panthera tigris altaica).
11. Practical Activities (AO2 & AO3)
11.1. Activity – Constructing a Dichotomous Key for Eukaryotic Specimens
Goal: Develop a usable key for ten unknown eukaryotic specimens representing at least five kingdoms.
Materials: Light microscopes, prepared slides, hand lenses, reference cards (cell‑wall types, plastid types, flagella), data sheets.
Procedure (brief):
Observe each specimen; record characters such as cell wall presence/composition, type of nutrition, presence of chloroplasts or flagella, storage product, and mode of reproduction.
Group characters into mutually exclusive pairs (couplets) to form a dichotomous key.
Draft the key, test it on a different set of specimens, and refine ambiguous couplets.
Assessment: Students must (a) produce a correctly ordered key, (b) justify each couplet with observed evidence, and (c) explain how the key reflects the hierarchical taxonomic ranks.
11.2. Activity – DNA Barcoding Simulation
Extract short DNA sequences (provided) from a set of organisms (e.g., COI for animals, rbcL for plants).
Use a simple alignment tool (e.g., BLAST‑like web interface) to identify closest matches in a reference database.
Discuss how sequence similarity supports or contradicts the morphological identification and which species concept is being applied.
Learning Outcomes
Apply the Linnaean hierarchy to a range of eukaryotes.
Explain how molecular data refine classification and species delimitation.
Analyse the impact of natural selection and human activities on biodiversity.
Demonstrate practical skills in observation, key construction, and basic bioinformatics.
Support e-Consult Kenya
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources,
past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.