Show understanding of how the grammar of a language can be expressed using syntax diagrams or Backus-Naur Form (BNF) notation

Published by Patrick Mutisya · 14 days ago

Cambridge A-Level Computer Science 9618 – 16.2 Translation Software

16.2 Translation Software

Objective

Show understanding of how the grammar of a language can be expressed using syntax diagrams or Backus‑Naur Form (BNF) notation.

1. Why Grammar Matters in Translation Software

Translation software (compilers, interpreters, assemblers) must recognise whether a sequence of symbols forms a valid program. This is achieved by defining the grammar of the source language – a set of rules that describe the syntactic structure of legal programs.

2. Formal Ways to Describe Grammar

  • Syntax diagrams (also called railroad diagrams) – visual representations that show the flow of tokens.
  • Backus‑Naur Form (BNF) – a textual notation using production rules.

3. Syntax Diagrams

A syntax diagram consists of a start point, a series of nodes (terminals or non‑terminals), and an end point. The path from start to end represents one valid construction.

Suggested diagram: A simple syntax diagram for an if‑statement showing the sequence if ( condition ) statement.

4. Backus‑Naur Form (BNF)

BNF expresses grammar as a set of production rules. Each rule has the form:

\$\langle\text{non‑terminal}\rangle ::= \text{definition}\$

where the definition may contain terminals (written in quotes) and other non‑terminals (enclosed in angle brackets).

5. Example Language – Simple Arithmetic Expressions

Consider a language that allows integer literals, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and parentheses.

5.1 BNF for the language

<expr> ::= <term> { ("+" | "-") <term> }

<term> ::= <factor> { ("*" | "/") <factor> }

<factor> ::= <integer> | "(" <expr> ")"

<integer> ::= <digit> { <digit> }

<digit> ::= "0" | "1" | "2" | "3" | "4" | "5" | "6" | "7" | "8" | "9"

5.2 Corresponding Syntax Diagrams

Each BNF rule can be turned into a diagram. Below is a textual description of the diagram for <expr>:

  • Start → <term> → Loop:

    • Optional branch: "+" or "-" → <term>
    • Repeat loop zero or more times.

  • End

Suggested diagram: Syntax diagram for <expr> showing the loop for addition and subtraction.

6. Comparing Syntax Diagrams and BNF

AspectSyntax DiagramsBNF Notation
RepresentationVisual, flow‑chart styleTextual, rule‑based
Readability for beginnersOften clearer because of graphicsRequires understanding of symbols
Ease of machine processingNeeds conversion to a formal grammarDirectly usable by parser generators
ExpressivenessCan become cumbersome for large grammarsCompact even for complex languages

7. From BNF to Syntax Diagrams (and vice‑versa)

  1. Identify each non‑terminal in the BNF.
  2. For each production, draw a linear path from start to end.
  3. Use branching to represent alternatives (the “|” operator).
  4. Use loops to represent repetitions (the “{ }” notation).
  5. Conversely, read a diagram left‑to‑right and translate each segment back into BNF symbols.

8. Practical Use in Translation Software

When building a compiler:

  • The grammar is first written in BNF (or an extended form such as EBNF).
  • Tools like yacc or ANTLR consume the BNF to generate a parser.
  • Syntax diagrams are useful in documentation, teaching, and for manual inspection of the language structure.

9. Summary

Both syntax diagrams and BNF provide a formal way to describe the grammar of a programming language. BNF is concise and machine‑readable, making it ideal for implementing translators. Syntax diagrams give a visual intuition that helps learners and developers verify the language structure.

10. Practice Questions

  1. Write BNF rules for a language that supports while loops with the syntax while ( condition ) statement.
  2. Convert the following BNF rule into a textual description of a syntax diagram:

    <assignment> ::= <identifier> "=" <expr> ";"

  3. Identify two advantages of using BNF over syntax diagrams when creating a large‑scale compiler.
  4. Given the syntax diagram for an if‑else statement (see suggested diagram in section 3), write the equivalent BNF rule.