To understand how a galvanometer is employed in null‑method measurements with potential dividers and potentiometers, and to be able to plan, set up, analyse and evaluate such experiments to the standard required for Cambridge International AS & A Level Physics (9702).
\$V{R2}=Vs\frac{R2}{R1+R2}\$
Consider the Wheatstone‑type circuit shown in the figure (see below). The galvanometer (G) connects the two junctions.
\$\sum I{\text{into}} = \sum I{\text{out}} \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; I1 = I2 \qquad\text{(1)}\$
At null the galvanometer draws negligible current, so the same current flows in the left and right branches.
\$Vs - I1(R1+R2)=0 \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; I1=\frac{Vs}{R1+R2} \qquad\text{(2)}\$
\$Vs - I2(R{\text{adj}}+R{\text{ref}})=0 \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; I2=\frac{Vs}{R{\text{adj}}+R{\text{ref}}} \qquad\text{(3)}\$
\$\frac{R2}{R1+R2}= \frac{R{\text{adj}}}{R{\text{adj}}+R{\text{ref}}} \qquad\text{(4)}\$
This derivation satisfies the syllabus requirement to “derive and apply Kirchhoff’s laws”.
Given: R1=2.0 kΩ, Radj=3.0 kΩ, Rref=1.0 kΩ. Find the unknown resistor R2 when the galvanometer is at null.
\$\frac{R2}{R1+R_2}= \frac{3.0}{3.0+1.0}=0.75\$
\$R2 =0.75(R1+R_2)\$
\$R2-0.75R2 =0.75R1 \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\;0.25R2 =0.75R_1\$
\$R2 =3R1 =3\times2.0\ \text{kΩ}=6.0\ \text{kΩ}\$
Definition: A potentiometer is a uniform resistance wire (or calibrated resistor bank) used as a potential divider to compare an unknown emf with a known reference voltage. No current is drawn from the source being measured when the null condition is achieved.
\$Rl =\frac{l}{L}\,Rp\$
where L is the total length of the wire.
\$\frac{Eu}{Vs}= \frac{Rl}{Rp}= \frac{l}{L} \qquad\text{(5)}\$
\$Eu = Vs\frac{l}{L}\$
\$V = E - I r \qquad\text{(6)}\$
In a null‑method measurement the galvanometer current is essentially zero (I≈0), so from (6) the terminal voltage equals the emf of the source being compared. This is the reason why null methods give higher accuracy than direct‑reading voltmeters.
| Benefit | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Minimal loading | The galvanometer draws only a tiny current at null, so the measured quantity is not altered. |
| High accuracy | Zero‑deflection can be detected to a fraction of the galvanometer’s full‑scale deflection, giving resolutions of 10⁻⁴ – 10⁻⁵ of the full scale. |
| Elimination of systematic errors | No direct current or voltage is read, so errors due to instrument internal resistance are avoided. |
| Section | What to Fill In |
|---|---|
| Aim | State the quantity to be measured (e.g., “To determine the emf of an unknown cell using a potentiometer.”) |
| Apparatus & Materials | List all items with specifications (e.g., potentiometer wire 1.5 m, 150 Ω; regulated 6.00 V supply; galvanometer 10 µA ÷ 10 µV; jockey, connecting leads, etc.). |
| Safety & Precautions | Identify hazards (e.g., hot wires, battery reversal), and note precautions (use insulated leads, avoid short‑circuits, keep the circuit off while changing connections). |
| Method (step‑by‑step) | Provide a concise numbered procedure that can be copied into the exam answer sheet. |
| Data Table | Prepare a table for recording length l, supply voltage, and any known resistor values. |
| Calculations | Show the formulae to be used (e.g., (5) for emf, (4) for unknown resistance) and indicate where to substitute measured values. |
| Evaluation | List possible sources of error and how they will be assessed (e.g., repeatability, percentage uncertainty). |
Data: R1=2.0 kΩ, Radj=3.0 kΩ, Rref=1.0 kΩ, galvanometer at null.
Using equation (4):
\$\frac{R2}{R1+R_2}= \frac{3.0}{3.0+1.0}=0.75\$
Solving gives R2=6.0 kΩ (see Worked Example above).
Data: Potentiometer length L = 1.50 m, total resistance Rp = 150 Ω, supply Vs = 6.00 V, null at l=0.75 m.
From (5):
\$Eu = Vs\frac{l}{L}=6.00\ \text{V}\times\frac{0.75}{1.50}=3.00\ \text{V}\$
| Error Source | Effect on Measurement | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Galvanometer zero drift | Apparent null point shifted → systematic offset | Zero the galvanometer with its terminals shorted before each trial; re‑check after large adjustments. |
| Thermal EMF at contacts | Spurious voltages (µV–mV) add to the measured potential | Use identical metals for connections, keep junctions symmetric, and allow the circuit to reach thermal equilibrium. |
| Contact resistance / dirty terminals | Alters effective resistance ratios, especially in a Wheatstone bridge | Clean contacts, tighten screws, or employ four‑wire (Kelvin) connections where feasible. |
| Supply voltage fluctuation | Changes divider ratios during measurement | Use a regulated DC source or a fresh high‑capacity battery; monitor with a voltmeter. |
| Inaccurate length measurement on a potentiometer | Directly affects the calculated emf | Use a calibrated scale, read the jockey position at eye level, and repeat measurements. |
– Cambridge International A‑Level Physics (9702), Chapter 10 “Electrical Measurements”.
– J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, sections on precision measurement techniques.
– J. R. D. Taylor, Principles of Measurement, Chapter 4 on null methods and potentiometers.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.