| Component | What it records | Typical policy influence |
|---|---|---|
| Current Account | Exports‑imports of goods & services, primary income, secondary income | Fiscal stimulus → higher imports; exchange‑rate depreciation → boost exports |
| Capital Account | Transfers of non‑produced, non‑financial assets (e.g., debt forgiveness) | Debt‑relief programmes improve the capital‑account balance |
| Financial Account | Foreign direct investment, portfolio investment, other capital flows | Monetary tightening → capital outflows; liberalisation → inflows |
| Official‑Reserve Account | Changes in holdings of foreign currency, gold, SDRs | IMF standby arrangements increase reserves; exchange‑rate intervention uses reserves |
| Classification | Typical indicator(s) | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Low‑income economies | GDP per capita < $1 200 (World Bank); HDI < 0.55 | Afghanistan, Haiti |
| Lower‑middle‑income economies | GDP per capita $1 200‑$4 200 | India, Kenya |
| Upper‑middle‑income economies | GDP per capita $4 200‑$13 000 | Brazil, South Africa |
| High‑income economies | GDP per capita > $13 000; HDI > 0.80 | United Kingdom, Japan |
Low‑income countries usually have limited fiscal space and weak financial markets; they therefore rely more on external aid, concessional financing and basic macro‑stabilisation measures (e.g., IMF standby arrangements). Upper‑middle‑ and high‑income economies have deeper capital markets and can use a wider mix of expenditure‑switching tools such as exchange‑rate policy or trade liberalisation. Understanding a country’s classification helps explain which instruments are realistic and which are likely to be prescribed by the IMF or other multilateral bodies.
| Stage | Population & Demography | Income Distribution | Economic Structure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low‑income | High fertility, rapid population growth | High inequality; large informal sector | Agriculture‑dominant, limited industrial base |
| Middle‑income | Fertility falling, urbanisation accelerating | Moderate inequality; emerging middle class | Manufacturing and services expanding; still reliant on primary exports |
| High‑income | Low fertility, ageing population | Relatively low inequality (though pockets of disparity remain) | Service‑led, high‑tech manufacturing, sophisticated financial markets |
| Instrument | Typical borrower | Repayment period | Key conditions | Typical size (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stand‑by Arrangement (SBA) | Both developed and developing economies | 12–24 months (extendable) | Fiscal consolidation, monetary tightening, selective structural reforms | 5 billion – 50 billion |
| Extended Fund Facility (EFF) | Developing countries with longer‑term BoP problems | 36–48 months | Broad structural reforms, poverty‑reduction strategies, macro‑policy framework | 2 billion – 30 billion |
| Rapid Credit Facility (RCF) | Low‑income countries | Up to 12 months | Minimal conditionality; focus on urgent BoP needs | 100 million – 2 billion |
| Precautionary and Liquidity Line (PLL) | Countries with sound policies but vulnerable to external shocks | 12–24 months | Policy monitoring; no immediate reforms required | 500 million – 10 billion |
| Condition | Typical macro impact | Potential social impact |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal consolidation (e.g., primary balance = 3 % of GDP) | Reduces budget deficit → lower interest rates; short‑run AD falls | Higher unemployment, reduced public‑service provision |
| Monetary tightening (interest‑rate rise of ~200 bps) | Strengthens currency, curbs inflation; AD shifts left | Credit becomes more expensive for households and firms |
| Structural reforms (privatisation, labour‑market flexibility) | Improves long‑run productivity; potential rightward shift of LRAS | Short‑run job losses, possible rise in inequality if safety nets are weak |
| Governance measures (anti‑corruption, public‑financial‑management reforms) | Better fiscal credibility → lower risk premium | Improved service delivery when reforms are effectively implemented |
Assume an IMF‑mandated fiscal consolidation reduces the primary deficit by 2 % of GDP. In the short run aggregate demand falls, moving the equilibrium from point A to point B on an AD/AS diagram, leading to lower real GDP and a modest rise in unemployment. Over the medium term, lower debt‑service costs shift the long‑run aggregate‑supply curve rightward, restoring growth at a lower price level.
Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea each secured large Stand‑by Arrangements. The IMF required:
The immediate effect was a deep recession and rising unemployment. In later years, many of the reforms helped rebuild foreign‑exchange reserves and improve financial‑sector resilience, prompting the IMF to incorporate “social‑safety‑net” components in subsequent programmes.
The IMF is a central pillar of the international monetary system. Through surveillance, financial assistance and technical support it links countries at all stages of development. Its programmes aim to restore balance‑of‑payments stability, rebuild reserves and lay the groundwork for sustainable growth. However, the conditionality attached to IMF loans can restrict policy autonomy, generate short‑run social costs and raise concerns about the institution’s governance structure. A balanced assessment therefore weighs macro‑economic stabilisation against distributional consequences for vulnerable populations.
Create an account or Login to take a Quiz
Log in to suggest improvements to this note.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.