prohibitions and licences

Resources → Subject Notes → Economics → Lesson Plan

Government Policies to Correct Market Failure (Cambridge AS & A‑Level Economics – Section 8.1)

1. Why intervene? – The economic rationale

  • Market failure occurs when the free market does not allocate resources efficiently, leading to a loss of total welfare.
  • Typical causes:
    • Negative externalities (e.g., pollution, second‑hand smoke)
    • Positive externalities (e.g., education, vaccination)
    • Public goods (non‑rival, non‑excludable – e.g., national defence)
    • Information asymmetry (e.g., used‑car market)
    • Market power (monopoly/oligopoly)
  • When MSC > MPC the market produces too much; when MSC < MPB it produces too little. Government action aims to move the market to the socially optimal point where MSC = MSB.

2. Policy instruments (8.1.1 – 8.1.9)

Instrument Purpose Typical examples Key diagram(s)
Indirect taxes (excise, carbon tax) Internalise negative externalities by raising marginal private cost. Fuel tax, tobacco duty, carbon emissions tax. Supply‑demand diagram – leftward shift of supply, dead‑weight loss.
Subsidies Internalise positive externalities by lowering marginal private cost. Education grants, R&D tax credits, agricultural subsidies. Supply‑demand diagram – rightward shift of supply, dead‑weight loss.
Price controls (maximum & minimum prices) Protect consumers (max‑price) or producers (min‑price) when market outcomes are deemed unfair. Rent control (max‑price), minimum wage (min‑price). Price‑control diagram showing shortage (max) or surplus (min) and dead‑weight loss.
Production quotas Directly limit output to the socially optimal level. Agricultural output quotas, fishing total allowable catches (TAC). Vertical supply curve at the quota quantity; welfare triangles.
Prohibitions Ban activities that generate large negative externalities or are socially unacceptable. Illegal drugs, asbestos, certain weapons, unlicensed gambling. Supply curve shifted to the vertical axis (Q = 0); discussion of black‑market effects.
Licences / permits Control the quantity and/or quality of an activity while still allowing it. Taxi medallions, broadcasting licences, fishing licences, alcohol licences. Vertical supply curve at the allocated number of licences; auction/revenue analysis.
Regulation & deregulation Set mandatory standards (e.g., safety, emissions) or remove unnecessary rules to improve efficiency. Vehicle emission standards, food‑safety regulations, deregulation of airline routes. Cost‑curve diagram showing a shift in marginal cost or a reduction in marginal private cost.
Direct provision (public services) Supply goods where the market would under‑provide (public or merit goods). National health service, public schools, policing. Diagram of market failure for a public good and the government‑provided quantity.
Pollution permits (tradable‑permit markets) Combine a quantity limit with market trading to achieve the optimal level at the lowest cost. EU Emissions Trading Scheme, sulphur‑dioxide permits. Supply‑demand diagram for permits – equilibrium price of permits where marginal abatement cost = marginal benefit.
Property‑rights & privatisation Assign clear ownership to eliminate the “tragedy of the commons” and improve incentives. Privatised water utilities, land‑title reforms, fisheries rights. Diagram showing removal of externality once property rights are defined.
Information provision & “nudge” Correct information asymmetry or influence behaviour without coercion. Calorie labeling, energy‑efficiency ratings, default enrolment in pension schemes. Behaviour‑choice diagram illustrating a shift in the demand curve.
Buffer‑stock schemes Stabilise prices of commodities that are subject to large swings (often a public‑good issue). Food‑grain reserves, oil strategic reserves. Supply‑demand diagram showing government buying at the ceiling price and selling at the floor price.

2.1 Detailed look at selected instruments

Prohibitions
  • Purpose: Eliminate activities that cause severe negative externalities or are deemed socially unacceptable.
  • Mechanism: Legal ban makes the activity illegal; enforcement aims to drive quantity to zero.
  • Advantages:
    • Clear moral/policy signal.
    • Simple to communicate to the public.
    • Can eradicate the most harmful externalities if enforcement is effective.
  • Disadvantages:
    • High enforcement costs; risk of corruption.
    • Often creates a black market with higher prices and associated crime.
    • May discard any legitimate benefits of the activity.
  • Welfare analysis: The supply curve is shifted to the vertical axis (Q = 0). The dead‑weight loss equals the net benefit that would have been obtained from the legally allowed quantity.
Licences / Permits
  • Purpose: Allow an activity to continue while controlling its scale, quality, or location.
  • Mechanism: Government issues a limited number of licences; allocation methods include auctions, merit‑based criteria, or historical rights. Licences may be tradable (e.g., Individual Transferable Quotas in fisheries).
  • Advantages:
    • Retains economic benefits while limiting external costs.
    • Generates revenue that can be used to offset externalities.
    • Allocation can be designed to meet social objectives (regional development, minority access, etc.).
  • Disadvantages:
    • Administrative costs of issuing, monitoring, and renewing licences.
    • Potential for rent‑seeking, corruption, or market power if allocation is not transparent.
    • May create barriers to entry, reducing competition.
  • Welfare analysis: A vertical supply curve at the quota quantity (Qlicence) creates a dead‑weight loss equal to the triangle between marginal private cost, marginal social cost, and the allocated quantity.
Regulation & Deregulation
  • Purpose: Set mandatory standards (regulation) or remove unnecessary rules (deregulation) to improve allocative efficiency.
  • Mechanism: Legal requirements (e.g., emission limits, safety standards) force firms to internalise part of the external cost; deregulation removes a constraint that was causing excess costs.
  • Advantages:
    • Targets specific dimensions of a market failure (quality, safety, pollution).
    • Can be tailored to industry‑specific circumstances.
  • Disadvantages:
    • Compliance monitoring can be costly.
    • Over‑regulation may raise marginal costs unnecessarily.
    • Deregulation may lead to under‑provision of essential safeguards.
  • Diagram suggestion: Cost‑curve diagram showing a leftward shift in marginal private cost when a regulation raises compliance costs, or a rightward shift when deregulation removes them.
Property‑rights & Privatisation
  • Purpose: Assign clear ownership to eliminate the “tragedy of the commons” and give owners the incentive to manage resources efficiently.
  • Mechanism: Transfer of ownership (privatisation) or legal definition of usage rights (e.g., water‑user licences). Owners internalise the full marginal social cost/benefit.
  • Advantages:
    • Reduces over‑use of common resources.
    • Improves incentives for cost‑effective provision and maintenance.
    • Can generate one‑off revenue from the sale of assets.
  • Disadvantages:
    • May increase inequality if rights are allocated unfairly.
    • Risk of monopoly power without effective competition policy.
  • Diagram suggestion: Externality diagram where the introduction of well‑defined property rights aligns MSC with MPC, eliminating the dead‑weight loss.
Buffer‑stock Schemes
  • Purpose: Stabilise the price of essential commodities that experience large, volatile swings.
  • Mechanism: Government buys excess supply when market price is above a ceiling and releases stock when price falls below a floor, maintaining price within a target band.
  • Advantages:
    • Reduces price volatility for producers and consumers.
    • Provides a safety net for strategic resources (e.g., food security, oil).
  • Disadvantages:
    • Requires substantial storage capacity and fiscal outlay.
    • Risk of market distortion if the ceiling/floor is set incorrectly.
  • Diagram suggestion: Supply‑demand graph with a government‑imposed price ceiling (buying) and floor (selling) creating a buffer‑stock rectangle.

3. Evaluation – Choosing the appropriate instrument

  1. Severity of the externality: Very high health or safety risks (e.g., toxic chemicals) may justify a prohibition; moderate risks often suit licences, taxes, or tradable permits.
  2. Potential for legitimate benefits: If the activity has useful applications, a licence, quota, or tax is preferable to an outright ban.
  3. Administrative capacity & enforcement costs: Countries with limited resources may favour simple taxes or prohibitions; wealthier economies can manage complex permit markets or buffer‑stock schemes.
  4. Market structure: In markets with few firms, regulation, licences, or privatisation can curb monopoly power while controlling output.
  5. Distributional (equity) impacts: Taxes are regressive unless offset; subsidies are progressive; licences can be allocated to disadvantaged groups; buffer‑stock schemes protect low‑income consumers from price spikes.
  6. Political acceptability: Licences, “nudge” policies and information provision often face less public resistance than bans.
  7. Flexibility & cost‑effectiveness: Tradable permits, taxes, and buffer‑stock schemes can be adjusted quickly; prohibitions are rigid.
  8. Potential for government failure: Consider regulatory capture, information problems, high implementation costs, and unintended consequences (e.g., black markets, rent‑seeking).

4. Government‑failure – Limits to policy effectiveness

  • Regulatory capture: Industries may influence the regulator to design weak rules.
  • Information problems: Governments may lack accurate data to set the optimal tax rate, quota level, licence price, or buffer‑stock ceiling/floor.
  • Implementation & enforcement costs: High costs can outweigh the benefits of the policy.
  • Unintended consequences: Tax evasion, rent‑seeking, black‑market growth, or “perverse incentives” such as over‑production of subsidised goods.
  • Equity considerations: Policies may disproportionately affect low‑income households (e.g., fuel taxes) unless compensatory measures are introduced.

5. Summary diagram suggestions (to be drawn in exam)

  • Supply‑demand graph showing the effect of an indirect tax (supply shifts left, dead‑weight loss).
  • Supply‑demand graph showing the effect of a subsidy (supply shifts right, dead‑weight loss).
  • Price‑control diagram:
    • Maximum price below equilibrium – shortage.
    • Minimum price above equilibrium – surplus.
  • Vertical supply curve representing a quota or licence at Qlicence with welfare triangles.
  • Supply curve shifted to zero to illustrate a prohibition.
  • Supply‑demand diagram for a tradable‑permit market (permit price where marginal abatement cost = marginal benefit).
  • Cost‑curve diagram for regulation (leftward shift of marginal private cost) and deregulation (rightward shift).
  • Externality diagram showing removal of dead‑weight loss when property‑rights are assigned.
  • Buffer‑stock diagram with a government‑imposed price ceiling and floor, showing the stock‑holding rectangle.

6. Quick‑reference table – Pros & Cons of the main instruments

Instrument Key advantage(s) Key disadvantage(s) Typical use
Indirect tax Internalises negative externalities; generates revenue. Regressive unless offset; possible evasion. Carbon tax, tobacco duty.
Subsidy Encourages socially beneficial activity; can be targeted. Fiscal cost; risk of over‑supply. Education grants, renewable‑energy incentives.
Maximum price (price ceiling) Protects consumers when prices are deemed too high. Creates shortages; dead‑weight loss. Rent control, essential‑goods price caps.
Minimum price (price floor) Protects producers when market price is too low. Creates surpluses; dead‑weight loss. Minimum wage, agricultural price supports.
Quota / licence Directly limits quantity; can raise revenue (auction). Administrative burden; potential rent‑seeking. Fishing TAC, taxi medallions.
Prohibition Clear moral signal; can eradicate activity if enforced. High enforcement cost; encourages black market. Illegal drugs, asbestos.
Regulation Sets quality, safety or environmental standards; flexible. Compliance monitoring can be costly. Vehicle emission standards, food‑safety rules.
Deregulation Removes unnecessary constraints; can lower costs. Risk of under‑protection or market failures. Deregulating airline routes, telecom markets.
Direct provision Ensures access to merit or public goods. Fiscal burden; possible inefficiency. Public healthcare, education, policing.
Pollution permits Achieves quantity target at lowest cost; creates a market. Requires well‑defined property rights; allocation disputes. EU ETS, sulphur‑dioxide trading.
Property‑rights / privatisation Reduces over‑use of common resources; improves incentives. May increase inequality; possible monopoly power. Privatised water utilities, land‑title reforms.
Information & “nudge” Low cost; respects consumer choice. Effectiveness depends on behavioural response. Calorie labeling, default pension enrolment.
Buffer‑stock scheme Stabilises prices of essential commodities. Requires storage and fiscal resources; can distort markets. Food‑grain reserves, oil strategic reserves.

7. Concluding remarks

Cambridge AS & A‑Level Economics expects you to:

  • Identify the specific market failure and select the most appropriate policy instrument.
  • Explain the economic rationale, illustrate with the relevant diagram(s), and quantify the welfare impact.
  • Evaluate short‑run and long‑run effectiveness, administrative feasibility, equity implications, and the risk of government failure.
  • Compare alternative instruments and justify why one is preferable in the given context.

Mastering this structured approach will enable you to answer any exam question on government intervention with clear, analytical, and well‑supported arguments.

Create an account or Login to take a Quiz

43 views
0 improvement suggestions

Log in to suggest improvements to this note.