A high ratio signals greater vulnerability, especially for low‑income economies with limited fiscal capacity.
5. Debt‑Sustainability Framework (DSF)
5.1 Basic DSF Test
Project the future debt‑to‑GDP ratio using the government’s fiscal plan.
Compare the projected ratio with the threshold appropriate for the country’s income group.
If the projected ratio stays below the threshold, debt is judged sustainable.
5.2 Key Diagnostic Variables
Primary balance (PB) – fiscal balance excluding interest payments. A primary surplus is needed to stabilise or reduce debt.
Interest‑growth differential (r − g). When the real interest rate on debt (r) exceeds the real GDP growth rate (g), debt tends to explode unless a primary surplus is generated.
5.3 Debt‑to‑GDP Thresholds (Indicative)
Income Group
Debt‑to‑GDP Threshold (%)
Typical Risk Indicators
Low‑income
30 – 40
High primary deficit, low foreign reserves, weak institutions
Lower‑middle‑income
40 – 50
Moderate primary deficit, limited fiscal space
Upper‑middle‑income
50 – 60
Higher fiscal capacity, diversified export base
High‑income
60 +
Strong institutions, deep capital markets
6. Consequences of High Debt Levels
6.1 Macroeconomic Consequences
Debt‑service burden – A larger share of government revenue must be spent on interest and principal repayments, crowding‑out health, education and productive investment.
Fiscal drag – To meet debt‑service obligations governments may raise taxes or cut spending, which can slow growth.
Exchange‑rate pressure – Servicing foreign‑currency debt can force the sale of foreign reserves, leading to depreciation and imported‑inflation.
Risk of default – Failure to meet obligations can trigger a sovereign debt crisis, loss of market access and sharply higher borrowing costs.
6.2 Development‑Specific Consequences
Debt overhang – When investors expect that a large part of future earnings will be used to repay debt, they postpone or cancel investment, reducing potential growth.
Crowding‑out of productive investment – Resources diverted to debt service limit the ability to finance human‑capital formation, technology adoption and infrastructure.
Conditionality & loss of policy autonomy – Loans from the IMF or World Bank often come with structural‑adjustment conditions (e.g., fiscal consolidation, trade liberalisation) that restrict a country’s policy choices.
Social impacts – Austerity measures can raise unemployment, increase inequality and undermine social stability.
7. Balance‑of‑Payments (BoP) Implications and Policy Tools (11.5.1)
External debt is both a symptom and a cause of BoP disequilibrium. A persistent current‑account deficit forces a country to borrow, which in turn creates future repayment obligations that can worsen the deficit.
7.1 Policy Instruments to Correct a BoP Disequilibrium
Policy Area
Tool
Typical Effect on the BoP
Fiscal
Contractionary budget (higher taxes, reduced public spending)
Reduces domestic demand for imports → improves current account.
Monetary
Higher policy interest rates
Attracts foreign capital → improves capital account; may also appreciate the currency, reducing export competitiveness.
Supply‑side
Improving productivity, removing bottlenecks
Increases export capacity and reduces import dependence.
Exchange‑rate
Devaluation (under flexible rates) or revaluation (under fixed rates)
Devaluation makes exports cheaper and imports more expensive → improves current account; revaluation has the opposite effect.
Capital‑account controls
Restrictions on short‑term capital inflows/outflows
Can stem rapid capital flight during a debt crisis, stabilising reserves.
7.2 Example
Country Y experienced a current‑account deficit of 5 % of GDP in 2022. The government introduced a modest fiscal consolidation (primary surplus of 1 % of GDP) and allowed a 7 % devaluation of its fixed exchange rate. Within two years the deficit fell to 1 % of GDP, easing debt‑service pressures.
8. Exchange‑Rate Effects (11.5.2)
Nominal vs real exchange rate – Nominal rates are the market price of one currency in another; real rates adjust for price‑level differences and affect competitiveness.
Fixed, pegged and managed float systems – Fixed regimes can provide stability but limit the ability to absorb external shocks; managed floats allow limited adjustments.
Devaluation / revaluation – Devaluation improves export competitiveness but raises the local‑currency cost of foreign‑denominated debt.
Marshall‑Lerner condition – A devaluation improves the trade balance only if the sum of the absolute values of the export and import demand elasticities exceeds 1.
J‑curve effect – After an initial deterioration, the trade balance may improve as quantities adjust to the new exchange rate.
9. Development‑Specific Issues (11.5.3 & 11.5.4)
9.1 Key Living‑Standard and Inequality Indicators
GDP per capita (PPP)
Human Development Index (HDI)
Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI)
Gini coefficient (income inequality)
Mean Years of Schooling (MEW)
9.2 Kuznets Curve
The Kuznets curve hypothesises an inverted‑U relationship between income per capita and inequality: as an economy develops, inequality first rises (industrialisation) and then falls (broad‑based education and redistribution). High debt can shift the curve upward by limiting public investment in health and education.
9.3 Characteristics of Countries at Different Development Levels
Level
Population & Demography
Economic Structure
Income Distribution
Typical Debt Profile
Low‑income
High fertility, young age structure
Agriculture‑dominant, limited manufacturing
High inequality, large rural‑urban gap
Low external borrowing, high aid dependence; debt‑to‑GDP often > 30 %
Lower‑middle‑income
Rapid urbanisation, growing labour force
Mixed agriculture‑manufacturing‑services
Moderate inequality, emerging middle class
Rising commercial debt; debt‑to‑GDP 40‑50 %
Upper‑middle‑income
Slowing population growth, ageing trend begins
Service‑oriented, diversified exports
Lower inequality, stronger social safety nets
Higher debt capacity; debt‑to‑GDP 50‑60 %
High‑income
Stable or declining population, high labour productivity
Advanced services, high‑tech manufacturing
Low inequality, extensive welfare systems
Deep capital markets; debt‑to‑GDP often > 60 % without sustainability concerns
10. Relationship Between Countries (11.5.5)
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – Can provide foreign‑exchange earnings and technology transfer, reducing the need for debt. However, excessive external debt can deter FDI because of perceived repayment risk.
External‑debt burden – High debt levels in one country can affect creditors and neighbouring economies (e.g., contagion through banking links or trade).
Globalisation – Integrated financial markets mean that shocks in major economies (interest‑rate hikes, recessions) quickly transmit to debt‑laden developing countries.
Multinational corporations (MNCs) – Their profit repatriation can create current‑account deficits; at the same time, MNC‑led projects may be financed through external borrowing, adding to the host country’s debt stock.
Aid and conditionality – Aid can be used to stabilise a country’s external position, but policy conditions may limit fiscal autonomy and affect long‑term growth.
11. Debt Traps and Vicious Cycles
Borrow to finance current‑account deficits → external debt rises.
Fiscal consolidation – Improving tax collection, widening the tax base and cutting non‑productive spending to generate a primary surplus.
Growth‑oriented strategies – Investing in sectors with high multiplier effects (education, renewable energy, high‑value manufacturing) to boost export earnings.
Building foreign‑exchange reserves – Accumulating buffers to reduce reliance on short‑term borrowing and to defend the exchange rate.
Improving governance – Strengthening institutions, enhancing transparency and ensuring that borrowed funds are used productively.
BoP‑focused adjustments – Using exchange‑rate policy, capital‑account controls or supply‑side reforms to correct current‑account imbalances.
13. Illustrative Case Study (Brief)
Country X – Lower‑middle‑income
2000‑2010: Heavy borrowing for road and port projects; debt‑to‑GDP rose to 55 %.
2012‑2014: Global commodity‑price slump cut export earnings; primary deficit widened to 4 % of GDP.
Debt service consumed 8 % of government revenue, forcing cuts in education and health.
2015: Negotiated a debt‑restructuring package (extended maturities, reduced interest rates). Combined with fiscal consolidation, the primary balance turned into a modest surplus, allowing a return to positive growth.
14. Summary
External debt can finance development, but high debt‑to‑GDP ratios increase macro‑economic vulnerability.
Debt sustainability hinges on the ability to generate a primary surplus and on the relationship between the real interest rate (r) and the real growth rate (g).
Debt overhang, crowding‑out, conditionality, and exchange‑rate pressures are key development‑specific risks.
Effective policy mixes debt‑management measures (restructuring, fiscal consolidation) with growth‑enhancing investment, BoP‑correcting tools, and good governance.
Understanding the characteristics of countries at different development levels, the role of FDI and globalisation, and the relevant balance‑of‑payments policies is essential for exam success in Cambridge 9708 – 11.5.
Suggested diagram: Flowchart of the debt‑trap cycle (borrow → higher debt service → reduced investment → slower growth → further borrowing).
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources,
past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.