Vegetation and soils: characteristics, adaptations, human impacts

Arid Environments – Vegetation and Soils

1. Characteristics of Arid‑zone Vegetation (Syllabus 10.1)

  • Rainfall: < 250 mm yr⁻¹ (highly irregular).
  • Growth forms: dwarf shrubs, low‑lying trees, succulents (aloes, cacti), short‑lived annuals.
  • Cover pattern: patchy vegetation mosaics (shrub‑steppe, true desert, scattered grasses) interspersed with extensive bare ground.
  • Biomass productivity: very low net primary productivity (≈ 50–150 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹).
  • Succession: primary succession → pioneer grasses → shrubland (sub‑climax) → possible plagioclimax where grazing or fire maintains a non‑climax state (the syllabus expects the term “succession”).

2. Plant Adaptations to Aridity (Syllabus 10.2)

Adaptations are grouped into three categories. Water‑use efficiency (WUE) is the amount of carbon fixed per unit of water lost; higher WUE means a plant can grow with less water. For example, CAM plants can achieve a WUE of ≈ 3 g CO₂ g⁻¹ H₂O, whereas typical C₃ plants are ≈ 1 g CO₂ g⁻¹ H₂O.

Adaptation Type Examples Function / Benefit (how it raises WUE)
Morphological Reduced leaf area, thick cuticles, sunken stomata, spines, deep tap‑roots, extensive lateral roots Minimise transpirational loss; increase water capture from deep or diffuse sources.
Physiological C₄ photosynthesis, CAM (Crassulacean Acid Metabolism), osmotic adjustment (accumulation of solutes) Improve WUE by concentrating CO₂ (C₄, CAM) or by maintaining cell turgor with fewer water molecules (osmotic adjustment).
Phenological Dormancy during drought, rapid germination & growth after rain, seasonal leaf shedding Synchronise life‑cycle stages with the brief periods when water is available, avoiding unnecessary water loss.

Additional Physical Weathering Mechanism (Syllabus 10.3)

  • Thermal‑stress cracking: repeated diurnal temperature extremes cause expansion‑contraction cycles that fracture rocks.
  • Salt‑crystallisation weathering: evaporation leaves salts in pores; when they crystallise they expand, breaking rock fragments and contributing to soil particle generation.

3. Characteristics of Arid‑zone Soils (Syllabus 10.4)

  • Very low organic matter (< 1 %); humus formation is limited.
  • Coarse texture – high sand content, field capacity < 10 %, low water‑holding capacity.
  • Alkaline (pH ≈ 8–9) because of calcium carbonate accumulation.
  • Frequent saline or gypsum‑rich horizons (solonchaks, gypsic horizons).

Dominant Soil Orders & Diagnostic Horizons (Syllabus 10.5)

Soil Order (FAO / USDA) Typical Profile (O → C) Key Diagnostic Horizon(s)
Aridisols – Calcisols O → A → B (calcic) → C Calcic horizon – accumulation of CaCO₃; often a hard caliche layer.
Entisols – Calci‑Entisols O → A → C (very shallow, weakly developed) Surface solonchak (saline) crust; minimal horizon development.
Gypsisols O → A → B (gypsic) → C Gypsic horizon – gypsum (CaSO₄·2H₂O) accumulation.

Soil Nutrient Cycling (Syllabus 10.6)

  • Carbon: limited organic inputs → slow humus formation; most carbon stored as inorganic carbonates.
  • Nitrogen: low mineralisation rates; biological N‑fixation by sparse leguminous shrubs is a crucial source.
  • Phosphorus: largely bound in calcium phosphates; low solubility restricts plant availability.

Suggested teacher diagram: a simple flow‑chart linking low organic matter → limited mineralisation → reliance on N‑fixing plants → feedback on soil fertility.

4. Soil Formation Processes in Arid Environments (Syllabus 10.7)

  1. Physical weathering: thermal expansion/contraction, thermal‑stress cracking, salt‑crystallisation, wind abrasion.
  2. Limited chemical weathering: low moisture reduces hydrolysis, oxidation and leaching.
  3. Aeolian deposition: wind‑blown silt (loess) can create thin, relatively fertile layers on desert margins.
  4. Pedogenic carbonate & gypsum accumulation: precipitation of CaCO₃ (caliche) or CaSO₄ (gypsic) as water evaporates.
  5. Salinisation: upward movement of saline groundwater concentrates salts in the surface horizon.
  6. Time‑scale: noticeable soil development typically requires centuries to millennia in arid settings, underscoring the “change over time” key concept.

5. Human Impacts on Arid‑zone Vegetation (Syllabus 10.8)

  • Over‑grazing removes protective plant cover → increased bare ground → desertification.
  • Unsustainable groundwater extraction lowers water tables, stressing deep‑rooted shrubs.
  • Land clearing for agriculture introduces invasive species that out‑compete native xerophytes.
  • Mining, road building and urban expansion disturb biological crusts, accelerating wind erosion.
  • Fire regime changes: fire introduced to manage livestock or for hunting can convert shrubland to a plagioclimax state, reducing woody cover and altering nutrient cycles.

6. Human Impacts on Arid‑zone Soils (Syllabus 10.8)

  • Destruction of biological and physical crusts → loss of surface stability and nutrient fixation.
  • Salinisation from irrigation with poor‑quality water; rising water tables bring salts to the surface.
  • Compaction by heavy machinery reduces infiltration and root penetration.
  • Dust storms mobilise fine particles, depleting topsoil of organic matter and nutrients.

7. Detailed Case Study – Sahelian Desertification (Niger) (Syllabus 10.9)

Cause: Recurrent droughts (1970s‑80s) combined with expanding livestock numbers and unsustainable cultivation on marginal lands.

Impact on vegetation: Conversion of savanna woodland to shrub‑steppe and bare patches; loss of > 30 % of woody biomass.

Impact on soils: Development of surface solonchak crusts, increased wind erosion, and a ≈ 40 % reduction in soil organic carbon.

Management interventions:

  1. Community‑led “Fadama” water‑harvesting basins to capture runoff and support small‑scale irrigation.
  2. Agro‑forestry programmes planting drought‑tolerant species (e.g., Acacia senegal) as windbreaks.
  3. Rotational grazing schemes enforced through local herders’ cooperatives.

Evaluation of success (aligned with the Cambridge evaluation framework):

  • Effectiveness: Soil organic matter increased by 15 % in pilot basins; vegetation cover rose from 35 % to 55 % over ten years.
  • Sustainability: Community enforcement provides social robustness, but long‑term water availability remains vulnerable to climate variability.
  • Economic feasibility: High initial construction costs; improved crop yields are beginning to offset expenses.
  • Comparative note: Large‑scale irrigation schemes in the same region have caused severe salinisation, illustrating the importance of low‑leaching water use.

8. Management Strategies – Evaluation Framework (Syllabus 10.10)

When assessing any mitigation measure, consider the four criteria below.

Criterion What to assess
Effectiveness Degree to which erosion is reduced or vegetation is restored.
Environmental sustainability Avoidance of secondary problems (e.g., salinisation, loss of biodiversity).
Socio‑economic feasibility Cost, labour requirements, community acceptance and long‑term maintenance.
Scalability Potential to apply the technique at larger catchment or national levels.

Contrasting Example Strategies

Strategy Key Benefits Potential Drawbacks Evaluation (using the four criteria)
Windbreaks & shelterbelts of native drought‑tolerant species Reduces wind speed, traps sand, provides habitat and fuelwood. Long establishment time; competition for scarce water. High effectiveness & sustainability; moderate cost; good community involvement; scalable to farm‑scale but limited at landscape scale without extensive planting.
Drip‑irrigation with leaching‑free water Very water‑efficient; limits salinity buildup; boosts yields. Capital intensive; requires technical skills and reliable water source. Very effective for productivity; sustainability depends on water quality; high economic barrier; scalable where capital and water are available.

9. Scale‑Reflection Box

Think about scale:

  • Local example: A small sand‑dune field in the Australian Outback – biological soil crusts (cyanobacteria‑lichen‑moss) stabilise surface sand and fix nitrogen.
  • Global contrast: The Sahara Desert – vast expanses of solonchaks and minimal vegetation illustrate how increasing aridity amplifies the same processes.
  • Compare a windbreak programme on a 10 ha farm versus a 10 000 km² desert margin. Discuss differences in cost per hectare, monitoring requirements, and potential for community participation.

10. Summary

Arid environments are characterised by:

  • Sparse, highly adapted vegetation mosaics with low productivity and a recognised succession pathway (primary → pioneer → sub‑climax → possible plagioclimax).
  • Plant adaptations (morphological, physiological, phenological) that raise water‑use efficiency; quantitative examples (CAM WUE ≈ 3 g CO₂ g⁻¹ H₂O).
  • Soils that are low in organic matter, alkaline, often saline or gypsum‑rich, and develop extremely slowly (centuries‑to‑millennia).
  • Physical weathering dominated by thermal‑stress cracking and salt‑crystallisation, with limited chemical weathering.
  • Human pressures—over‑grazing, groundwater extraction, land clearing, mining, altered fire regimes—that destabilise vegetation and soils, leading to desertification.
  • Management must combine ecological (native windbreaks, controlled grazing, restoration of biological crusts) and engineering (water‑harvesting, drip irrigation) approaches, evaluated against effectiveness, sustainability, socio‑economic feasibility and scalability.
Suggested diagram: Water‑use efficiency pathways (C₃, C₄, CAM) in desert plants.
Suggested diagram: Profile of a typical arid‑zone soil showing O‑A‑B (calcic or gypsic)‑C, with possible surface solonchak crust.

Create an account or Login to take a Quiz

44 views
0 improvement suggestions

Log in to suggest improvements to this note.