Influenza (flu) as an example of a viral disease

Pathogenic Diseases – Disease and Geography (Cambridge AS & A Level)

Geographers examine where diseases occur, why patterns differ, and how societies respond. The following notes use **influenza (the flu)** as a model viral disease and are organised to map directly onto the eight key concepts required for Paper 4 – “Disease and Geography”.

Key Concepts Mapping

  • Scale – influenza operates from local outbreaks (e.g., a university) to regional waves (Southeast Asia) and global pandemics (1918, 2009).
  • Place – incidence varies with climate, urban form, and health‑system capacity.
  • Change over time – seasonal peaks, historical pandemics, and the accelerating speed of spread due to modern transport.
  • Cause‑and‑effect – temperature, humidity, population density, mobility and health‑system resources affect transmission probability and contact rates.
  • Systems – interaction of virus, human behaviour, environment and health services determines outbreak outcomes.
  • Environmental interactions – climate and built environment modify droplet/aerosol survival.
  • Diversity, equality & inclusion – burden differs by age, income, gender and ethnicity.
  • Challenges & opportunities – vaccine development, surveillance networks, and equitable access to interventions.

1. What Is Influenza?

  • Acute respiratory infection caused by influenza viruses (types A, B and C).
  • Highly contagious; severity varies with age, health status and location.
  • Seasonal influenza occurs each year; pandemic influenza arises when a novel strain spreads globally.

2. Virus Overview (Brief Biomedical Context)

Only the features that influence geography are needed.

  • Enveloped, negative‑sense RNA virus with 8 segmented genes (A & B). Segmentation enables reassortment → new strains.
  • Key surface proteins:
    • Hemagglutinin (HA) – binds to respiratory cells; determines host specificity.
    • Neuraminidase (NA) – releases new virions; target of antivirals (e.g., oseltamivir).

3. Transmission Pathways

  1. Droplet transmission – large particles, travel ≤ 1 m, require close contact.
  2. Aerosol transmission – small particles, remain suspended for minutes, can travel several metres.
  3. Fomite transmission – contaminated surfaces, indirect transfer via hands.
Mode Typical Distance Key Control Measures
Droplet (large) ≤ 1 m Face masks, physical distancing
Aerosol (small) > 1 m, up to several metres Ventilation, air filtration, UV‑C
Fomite (surface) Any distance Hand hygiene, regular cleaning

4. Basic Epidemiological Measures

  • Incidence – new cases per 100 000 population in a given period.
  • Prevalence – total active cases at a point in time.
  • Case‑fatality rate (CFR) – deaths ÷ confirmed cases.
  • Basic reproduction number (R0):

    R0 = β × c × D

    • β = transmission probability per contact (influenced by climate, strain).
    • c = average contacts per person per day (higher in dense urban areas, schools, mass gatherings).
    • D = infectious period (≈ 5‑7 days for seasonal flu).

    Typical values: seasonal flu R0 ≈ 1.2‑1.8; pandemic strains > 2.5.

5. Geographical Distribution & Drivers of Spatial Variation

5.1 Global Patterns

  • Temperate regions (high‑income) – distinct winter peaks (Dec–Feb in the North, Jun–Aug in the South).
  • Tropical regions (low‑ and middle‑income) – less pronounced seasonality; peaks often align with rainy seasons or school terms.
Suggested map: World distribution of seasonal influenza incidence (cases per 100 000) colour‑coded by region (Temperate‑North, Temperate‑South, Tropical). Highlight high‑incidence corridors in East Asia, North America and Europe.

5.2 Drivers of Spatial Variation (Why Patterns Vary)

Driver Geographic Influence Effect on Transmission (β or c)
Climate (temperature & humidity) Cold, dry winters in temperate zones Increases droplet stability → higher β
Urban form & population density High‑rise housing, public transport hubs Raises contact rate (c)
Human mobility International air routes, commuter rail, migration Facilitates long‑distance spread, seeds new foci
Health‑system capacity Vaccination coverage, ICU beds, surveillance Reduces D (duration of infectiousness) and CFR
Socio‑economic inequality Overcrowded housing, limited access to care Elevates c and β for vulnerable groups

5.3 Scale of Analysis

  • Global – Pandemic spread via international air travel; WHO Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) monitors evolution.
  • Regional – 2009 H1N1 moved across Southeast Asia within weeks, amplified by dense megacities and regional flight networks.
  • Local – 2018 outbreak at a UK university (> 300 cases) where crowded lecture halls and low vaccination increased contacts.

5.4 Change Over Time – Historical Pandemics

Year Strain Estimated Global Cases Key Geographic Drivers
1918 H1N1 (Spanish flu) ≈ 500 million WWI troop movements, poor sanitation, limited medical care.
1957 H2N2 (Asian flu) ≈ 1‑2 billion Post‑war urbanisation in Asia, emerging air routes.
1968 H3N2 (Hong Kong flu) ≈ 1 billion Growth of international travel, improved surveillance.
2009 H1N1 (Swine flu) ≈ 1.4 billion Globalised food trade, dense megacities, rapid mobility.

Trend: Mortality rates have fallen thanks to better health care, but the speed of global spread has accelerated with modern transport.

6. Impacts of Influenza – Geographical Perspective

6.1 Health Impacts

  • Acute symptoms: fever, cough, sore throat, myalgia.
  • Complications: viral/bacterial pneumonia, exacerbation of chronic diseases, higher mortality in very young, elderly and immunocompromised.
  • Spatial inequality – higher CFR in low‑income regions (often > 2 %) compared with high‑income regions (< 0.1 %).

6.2 Economic Impacts

  • Direct costs: hospitalisation (average £3 500 per admission in the UK), antiviral drugs, annual vaccination programmes (≈ US$1 billion globally).
  • Indirect costs: absenteeism (average 3‑5 working days per case), estimated GDP loss of 0.1‑0.3 % during severe seasonal peaks (e.g., 2017‑18 flu season in the EU).

6.3 Social Impacts

  • School closures, cancellation of public events, and stigma towards infected individuals.
  • Disruption of essential services (e.g., reduced staffing in hospitals, transport).

6.4 Environmental Impacts

  • Increased use of disposable personal protective equipment (PPE) and cleaning chemicals.
  • Potential rise in antimicrobial resistance due to widespread antiviral use.

6.5 Diversity, Equality & Inclusion

  • Age – children and the elderly experience the highest attack rates and severe outcomes.
  • Income – low‑ and middle‑income countries often have <10 % vaccination coverage versus > 50 % in high‑income nations.
  • Gender & ethnicity – occupational exposure (e.g., health‑care workers, informal sector) can create gendered risk patterns; minority groups may face barriers to vaccination.

7. Control and Prevention – Evaluation of Strategies

  1. Vaccination
    • Annual reformulated vaccine targeting predicted circulating strains.
    • Strengths: Reduces incidence by 40‑60 % in well‑covered populations; lowers hospitalisation and mortality.
    • Weaknesses: Strain mismatch can drop effectiveness (< 30 %); limited access in low‑income settings; requires annual logistics.
  2. Antiviral drugs (e.g., oseltamivir)
    • Neuraminidase inhibitors shorten illness if started within 48 h.
    • Strengths: Useful for high‑risk patients and outbreak containment.
    • Weaknesses: Costly, risk of resistance, dependence on early diagnosis.
  3. Non‑pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs)
    • Hand hygiene, respiratory etiquette, face masks, physical distancing, ventilation, school closures.
    • Strengths: Immediate, low‑cost, effective where medical resources are scarce.
    • Weaknesses: Compliance varies; socio‑economic costs (lost education, reduced commerce).
  4. Surveillance & Reporting
    • WHO GISRS, national sentinel sites, rapid viral sub‑typing.
    • Strengths: Early detection enables timely vaccine updates and targeted NPIs.
    • Weaknesses: Dependent on laboratory capacity; under‑reporting in resource‑poor regions.
  5. Policy & International Coordination
    • Travel advisories, pandemic preparedness plans, stockpiling of antivirals, joint research initiatives.
    • Strengths: Reduces duplication, shares expertise, mobilises resources.
    • Weaknesses: Political disagreement, inequitable resource distribution, implementation gaps.

8. Case Studies for Comparative Analysis

8.1 1918 Spanish Flu (Global Scale)

  • Rapid spread via WWI troop movements; three waves in 1918‑19.
  • ≈ 50 million deaths; highest mortality in 20‑40 year olds.
  • Limited public‑health response highlighted the need for global surveillance.

8.2 2009 H1N1 Pandemic (Regional & Global)

  • Originated in North America; reached all continents within six months.
  • Higher infection rates in children and young adults; overall CFR ≈ 0.02 %.
  • Accelerated vaccine production (WHO‑prequalified) and coordinated mitigation guidelines.

8.3 2018 University Outbreak – Local Scale (UK)

  • 300+ confirmed cases on a single campus.
  • Drivers: crowded dormitories, shared study spaces, low vaccination uptake (≈ 30 %).
  • Control: temporary class suspension, targeted vaccination clinic, intensified cleaning, and communication campaign.

9. Systems Diagram (Textual Description)

Simple systems diagram of influenza in a human‑environment context (Inputs → Processes → Outputs).
  • Inputs: Virus introduction (travelers, animal reservoirs), susceptible population, environmental conditions (temperature, humidity).
  • Processes: Transmission pathways (droplet, aerosol, fomite), infection cycle, health‑system response (surveillance, treatment, vaccination).
  • Outputs: Cases, hospital admissions, economic loss, social disruption, policy feedback (vaccination campaigns, travel restrictions).

10. Summary Points (Key‑Concept Checklist)

  • Scale: Local (campus), regional (Southeast Asia), global (pandemic).
  • Place: Climate, density, mobility and health‑system capacity shape spatial patterns.
  • Change over time: Seasonal peaks, historic pandemics, faster global spread with modern transport.
  • Cause‑and‑effect: Low temperature & humidity ↑ β; high density & mobility ↑ c; strong health systems ↓ D and CFR.
  • Systems: Virus ↔ human behaviour ↔ environment ↔ health services.
  • Diversity & Equality: Burden higher in low‑income groups, the very young, the elderly, and certain occupational/ethnic groups.
  • Evaluation: Vaccination most effective where coverage is high; NPIs essential where resources are limited; surveillance underpins all strategies but requires equitable investment.
Suggested flowchart: “Virus introduction → Transmission pathways → Human‑environment system (population density, climate, mobility) → Impacts (health, economic, social, environmental) → Management (vaccination, antivirals, NPIs, surveillance, policy) → Feedback to reduce future risk.”

Create an account or Login to take a Quiz

38 views
0 improvement suggestions

Log in to suggest improvements to this note.