To understand why motivation is a core management tool, the theories and human needs that underpin it, the range of financial and non‑financial motivators, and how employees can take part in the management and control of business activity.
Managers use motivation to:
Motivation supports the decision‑making cycle (identify options → evaluate alternatives → implement decisions) by ensuring staff are willing and able to contribute ideas and effort.
Leadership style influences the use of motivation:
Human need: a requirement that, when unmet, creates a drive to act in order to satisfy it. The most common model used in the syllabus is Maslow’s hierarchy, but other models such as Alderfer’s ERG theory are also recognised.
| Need Level (Maslow) | Description | Relevance to Participation |
|---|---|---|
| Physiological | Food, water, rest, basic wages. | Met through adequate pay and safe working conditions. |
| Safety | Job security, safe environment, predictable income. | Secure contracts, clear policies and transparent decision‑making. |
| Social (Belonging) | Friendship, teamwork, acceptance. | Team‑based participation methods (quality circles, self‑managed teams). |
| Esteem | Recognition, status, achievement. | Suggestion schemes, employee awards, involvement in planning. |
| Self‑actualisation | Personal growth, realising potential. | Job enrichment, empowerment, participative budgeting. |
| Theory | Core Idea | Strength | Weakness | Link to Participation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientific Management (Taylor) | Monetary incentives & piece‑rate pay increase efficiency. | Clear performance standards; easy to measure. | Ignores social and psychological needs. | Financial incentives can be combined with employee‑generated standards. |
| Human Relations (Mayo) | Social needs and informal groups boost morale. | Highlights importance of employee attitudes. | Lacks a systematic link to productivity. | Quality circles and works councils address belonging and esteem. |
| Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs | Motivation moves up from basic to self‑actualisation. | Simple visual model; links needs to reward types. | Hierarchy not always linear; cultural differences. | Higher‑order needs are satisfied by participation methods. |
| Herzberg’s Two‑Factor Theory | Hygiene factors prevent dissatisfaction; motivators create satisfaction. | Distinguishes between extrinsic and intrinsic drivers. | Requires careful job design to avoid overlap. | Job enrichment and employee involvement act as true motivators. |
| McClelland’s Need Theory | Need for achievement, power, affiliation drives behaviour. | Focuses on individual differences. | Hard to measure needs accurately. | Achievement‑oriented staff thrive in self‑managed teams; power‑seeking staff benefit from representative roles. |
| Vroom’s Expectancy Theory | Motivation = Expectancy × Instrumentality × Valence. | Links effort, performance and reward explicitly. | Complex to apply in large organisations. | Clear participation processes raise expectancy (ideas will be heard) and instrumentality (ideas lead to rewards). |
| Method | How It Works | Typical Use | Link to Participation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time‑based wages | Fixed pay for a set period (e.g., monthly salary). | All staff, especially those with stable duties. | Can be combined with profit‑sharing based on team ideas. |
| Piece‑rate pay | Payment per unit produced. | Manufacturing, call‑centres. | Employees may suggest process improvements to increase output. |
| Commission | Percentage of sales/value generated. | Sales staff, brokers. | Sales teams can share market intelligence through suggestion schemes. |
| Bonuses | One‑off payment for meeting targets. | Annual performance, project completion. | Bonus tied to number of implemented employee ideas. |
| Profit‑sharing | Distribution of a share of profits to staff. | Companies seeking collective responsibility. | Directly rewards successful participation initiatives. |
| Performance‑related pay (PRP) | Variable pay linked to individual or team performance metrics. | Professional services, retail. | PRP schemes can incorporate participation scores (e.g., ideas accepted). |
| Fringe benefits | Non‑cash perks – health insurance, transport, meals. | Retention tool across all levels. | Enhanced when staff help design benefit packages. |
| Method | Key Features | Motivational Benefits | Potential Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suggestion Schemes | Formal, often anonymous, system for submitting ideas. | Recognition (esteem), sense of contribution, low‑cost improvements. | May attract many low‑value ideas; requires effective filtering. |
| Quality Circles | Small groups (5‑10) meet regularly to solve work‑related problems. | Team learning, empowerment, tangible achievement. | Time‑consuming; success depends on skilled facilitation. |
| Works Councils / Employee Representatives | Elected reps negotiate with management on policy and strategic issues. | Structured dialogue, influence on strategic decisions, status. | Risk of adversarial relations; needs clear legal framework. |
| Self‑Managed Teams | Teams control planning, scheduling, performance monitoring. | High autonomy, rapid response, ownership of outcomes. | Requires strong team skills; possible role ambiguity. |
| Participative Budgeting | Employees at various levels help set budgets and targets. | Realistic forecasts, greater commitment to targets. | Complex coordination; potential conflict over resources. |
| Job Enrichment & Job Design | Redesign tasks to include decision‑making, variety and responsibility. | Increases intrinsic motivation, reduces monotony. | May increase workload; not suitable for highly routine jobs. |
Use a mix of quantitative and qualitative indicators:
Create an account or Login to take a Quiz
Log in to suggest improvements to this note.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.