the need for communication of objectives and their likely impact on the workforce

1.4 Business Objectives – Communication and Workforce Impact

1. Introduction

Business objectives give an organisation direction, set performance standards and provide the basis for decision‑making. When objectives are communicated clearly, every employee can see how his or her daily work contributes to the overall purpose of the business.

2. Types of Objectives in Different Organisations

Objectives differ because the underlying purpose of the organisation differs. The table below shows the typical primary objective(s) for three common types of enterprise and explains why those objectives are chosen.

Sector / Enterprise Primary Objective(s) Why These Objectives? Typical Example (SMART)
Private profit‑oriented business Profit maximisation, market‑share growth, return on investment Owners and shareholders expect financial returns; competition forces firms to grow market share. “Increase net profit by 8 % in the next financial year.”
Public‑sector organisation Service delivery, efficiency, public value, compliance with legislation Funding comes from taxpayers; the aim is to provide affordable, high‑quality services rather than profit. “Raise secondary‑school enrolment in the district by 5 % by 2026.”
Social enterprise / Non‑profit Social, environmental and economic impact (triple‑bottom‑line) Mission focuses on creating societal or environmental change; financial sustainability is a means, not an end. “Reduce carbon emissions from production by 20 % over three years.”

CSR & the Triple‑Bottom‑Line

  • Economic: e.g. “Achieve a 5 % increase in revenue while keeping operating costs below 60 % of sales.”
  • Social: e.g. “Provide 200 apprenticeship places for local youth by 2025.”
  • Environmental: e.g. “Divert 80 % of waste from landfill by the end of 2024.”

When CSR is embedded, each dimension is expressed as a SMART target, ensuring that the objectives are measurable and time‑bound.

3. Hierarchy of Strategic Planning

Mission → Aims → Objectives → Strategy → Tactics diagram
Mission → Aims → Objectives → Strategy → Tactics

Each level feeds the next:

  • Mission: The organisation’s fundamental purpose (the “why”).
  • Aims: Broad, long‑term outcomes derived from the mission.
  • Objectives: Specific, measurable statements that translate aims into action.
  • Strategy: The overall approach chosen to achieve the objectives (e.g., market penetration, product differentiation, cost leadership).
  • Tactics: Concrete, short‑term actions that implement the strategy (e.g., launch a social‑media campaign, renegotiate supplier contracts).

4. SMART Objectives

Cambridge recommends that all objectives satisfy the SMART criteria:

  • Specific: Clear and unambiguous.
  • Measurable: Quantifiable or assessable.
  • Achievable: Realistic given resources and constraints.
  • Relevant: Directly linked to the organisation’s aims and mission.
  • Time‑bound: Includes a deadline or review date.

5. Objectives in the Decision‑Making Process

Objectives act as criteria at every stage of decision‑making:

  1. Identify the problem or opportunity. Objectives define what the organisation wants to achieve.
  2. Generate alternatives. Each alternative is judged against the set objectives.
  3. Evaluate alternatives. Use objective‑based criteria (cost, market share, environmental impact, etc.).
  4. Choose the best alternative. The option that best meets the objectives is selected.
  5. Implement and monitor. Progress is measured against the original objectives.

6. Translating Objectives → Targets → Budgets

Quantitative objectives are broken down into operational targets and then allocated to budget lines. Two contrasting examples illustrate the flexibility of the process.

  • Revenue‑growth example
    • Objective: “Increase sales revenue by 10 % next year.”
    • Target: “Sell 5 000 additional units of product X.”
    • Budget: “Allocate £250 000 to the marketing campaign that supports the sales target.”
  • Cost‑reduction example
    • Objective: “Reduce production‑line overheads by 8 % within 12 months.”
    • Target: “Cut energy consumption on Line 3 by 15 % and decrease overtime hours by 20 %.”
    • Budget: “Invest £45 000 in energy‑efficient machinery and allocate £10 000 for staff training on lean techniques.”

7. Stakeholder Impact of Objectives

Stakeholder How Objectives Affect Them
Shareholders / owners Profit‑related objectives influence dividends and share price.
Customers Service‑oriented objectives affect product quality, price, delivery speed and after‑sales support.
Employees Clear objectives improve motivation, clarify role expectations and support career development.
Suppliers Cost‑control objectives may change order volumes, payment terms and partnership expectations.
Community & government Public‑service objectives (e.g., “reduce traffic congestion”) affect licensing, regulation and local goodwill.

8. Why Communicating Objectives Is Essential

  • Creates a shared sense of purpose across the whole organisation.
  • Ensures coordinated action and reduces duplicated effort.
  • Provides a benchmark for performance measurement and appraisal.
  • Minimises uncertainty, resistance to change and speculation.

9. Impact on the Workforce

  1. Motivation & Engagement: Employees see how their role contributes to larger goals.
  2. Improved Decision‑Making: Staff can align everyday choices with stated objectives.
  3. Enhanced Accountability: Clear targets make performance assessment straightforward.
  4. Job Satisfaction: Understanding the “why” behind tasks reduces ambiguity.

10. Methods of Communicating Objectives

Method Key Features Advantages Potential Limitations
Company‑wide meetings Live presentations, Q&A, guest speakers Immediate feedback; builds unity and visibility Time‑consuming; may exclude remote or shift workers
Internal newsletters / intranet Written updates, downloadable PDFs, short videos On‑demand access; permanent record Risk of information overload; lower engagement without interaction
Team briefings Department‑specific focus, interactive discussion Tailors objectives to functional roles; encourages dialogue Requires consistent messaging from line managers
Visual dashboards Real‑time KPI displays on screens or digital boards Continuous visual reminder; easy progress tracking May oversimplify complex objectives; needs regular updating
Workshops & training sessions Hands‑on activities linking objectives to daily tasks Deepens understanding; builds skills for implementation Resource intensive; limited to participants present

11. Linking Communication to Motivation – VIE Theory

The Vroom‑Expectancy‑Instrumentality‑Valence (VIE) equation explains how clear objectives boost motivation:

Motivation = Expectancy × Instrumentality × Valence

  • Expectancy: Employees understand how effort leads to performance because objectives are explicit.
  • Instrumentality: Clear objectives show the link between performance and rewards (bonuses, promotions, recognition).
  • Valence: When objectives align with personal values or career aspirations, the perceived reward value rises.

12. Potential Pitfalls of Poor Communication

  • Misinterpretation of goals → wasted resources and missed targets.
  • Decreased morale if staff feel excluded from strategic direction.
  • Fragmented decision‑making when departments chase conflicting aims.
  • Higher turnover due to a perceived lack of purpose or direction.

13. Practical Steps for Managers

  1. Translate corporate objectives into department‑level targets and corresponding budget lines.
  2. Use a mix of verbal (meetings, briefings) and written (intranet, dashboards) channels.
  3. Invite two‑way feedback; clarify doubts promptly.
  4. Link performance appraisals, incentives and training directly to the communicated objectives.
  5. Review objectives regularly (e.g., quarterly) and communicate any changes transparently.

14. Suggested Diagram – Flow of Objective Communication

Flow diagram showing senior management → middle management → teams → frontline staff, with feedback loops back to senior management
Flow of objective communication from senior management → middle management → teams → frontline staff, with feedback loops influencing motivation and performance.

Create an account or Login to take a Quiz

31 views
0 improvement suggestions

Log in to suggest improvements to this note.