the impact on a business of measures to improve sustainability of operations

4.1 The Nature of Operations – Efficiency, Effectiveness, Productivity & Sustainability

Learning Objective

Understand the impact on a business of measures taken to improve the sustainability of its operations and be able to relate these measures to efficiency, effectiveness and productivity.

---

1. The Transformational Process

1.1 Factors of Production

• Land (natural resources) – raw materials, water, energy sources.
• Labour – human effort, skills and knowledge.
• Capital – machinery, equipment, buildings, technology.
• Enterprise – organisation, management, risk‑taking and coordination.

1.2 Stages of the Transformational Process

• Inputs: land, labour, capital and enterprise that enter the process.
• Transformation: activities that convert inputs into a product or service.
• Outputs: finished goods, services and by‑products (including waste and emissions).

1.3 Link to Business Objectives

The transformational process must deliver outputs that satisfy the firm’s strategic objectives – for example, meeting market demand, achieving target profit margins, and complying with environmental legislation. By analysing each stage, managers can identify where improvements in efficiency, effectiveness or sustainability will have the greatest impact on overall performance.

---

2. Measuring Efficiency, Effectiveness & Productivity

2.1 Formula Sheet

Concept	Formula	Typical Unit
Efficiency	\(\displaystyle \text{Efficiency} = \frac{\text{Output}}{\text{Input Cost}}\)	£ / unit, kWh / unit, kg waste / unit
Effectiveness	\(\displaystyle \text{Effectiveness} = \frac{\text{Actual Outcome}}{\text{Planned Outcome}}\times100\%\)	% (e.g., on‑time delivery, market‑share achieved)
Productivity	\(\displaystyle \text{Productivity} = \frac{\text{Total Output}}{\text{Total Input (labour‑hours)}}\)	Units / labour‑hour

2.2 Worked Example (same data set for all three measures)

Assume a small manufacturing unit produces 120 000 widgets in a month. The relevant data are:

• Total labour input: 4 000 hours
• Total material cost: £48 000
• Planned output (target): 130 000 widgets
• Actual on‑time deliveries: 115 000 out of 120 000

Measure	Calculation	Result
Labour productivity	\(\frac{120\,000\text{ widgets}}{4\,000\text{ hrs}} = 30\text{ widgets/hr}\)	30 widgets / labour‑hour
Efficiency (cost‑per‑unit)	\(\frac{£48\,000 + £12\,000}{120\,000} = £0.50\text{/unit}\)	£0.50 / unit
Effectiveness (output‑target)	\(\frac{120\,000}{130\,000}\times100 = 92.3\%\)	92.3 % of target achieved
Effectiveness (delivery‑performance)	\(\frac{115\,000}{120\,000}\times100 = 95.8\%\)	95.8 % on‑time delivery

These figures can be linked directly to sustainability KPIs: a lower cost‑per‑unit often reflects reduced material/energy use, while higher productivity can lower the carbon intensity per widget.

---

3. Capital‑Intensive vs Labour‑Intensive Operations

Aspect	Capital‑Intensive	Labour‑Intensive
Primary resource	Machinery, automation, high‑tech equipment	Human skill, manual work
Cost structure	High fixed costs, low variable labour cost	Low fixed costs, high variable labour cost
Typical efficiency driver	Energy‑efficient machines, economies of scale	Skilled work‑organisation, lean layout
Sustainability implication	Modern equipment can cut per‑unit emissions, but large capital can lock‑in fossil‑fuel use.	Flexibility allows low‑volume, locally sourced production and easier redesign for circularity.

---

4. Operations Methods (Cambridge 9609)

Method	Typical Use	Key Sustainability Link
Job production	One‑off, custom items (e.g., bespoke furniture)	High material utilisation through careful design; low energy per unit but risk of waste if design changes are frequent.
Batch production	Medium volumes of similar items (e.g., bakery goods)	Optimising batch size reduces change‑over waste and spreads set‑up energy across more units.
Flow (mass) production	Large volumes, standardised products (e.g., car engines)	Automation yields high energy efficiency and low material waste; however, capital lock‑in may limit future low‑carbon upgrades.
Mass‑customisation	High volume with individual options (e.g., personalised sneakers)	Combines flow efficiency with digital design, reducing physical prototyping waste.

4.1 Problems When Changing Production Methods

• Change‑over costs – new tooling, plant layout, IT systems.
• Staff retraining – temporary skill gaps may lower labour productivity.
• Short‑term productivity dip – learning curve and disruption to existing processes.
• Capital commitment – sunk costs in existing equipment create financial risk.
• Supply‑chain impact – suppliers may need to adjust volumes or specifications.

---

5. Inventory Management (Syllabus 4.2)

5.1 Why Inventory Exists

• Buffer against demand variability.
• Protect against supplier lead‑time fluctuations.
• Allow economies of scale in purchasing.
• Facilitate smooth production flow.

5.2 Main Types of Inventory

Type	Purpose
Raw materials	Inputs awaiting processing.
Work‑in‑progress (WIP)	Partially completed items.
Finished goods	Products ready for sale.
MRO (maintenance, repair, operations)	Supplies needed to keep equipment running.

5.3 Inventory Costs

• Holding cost – capital tied up, storage, insurance, obsolescence.
• Ordering cost – purchase‑order processing, transport.
• Stock‑out cost – lost sales, customer dissatisfaction.

5.4 Techniques & Quantitative Tools

• Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) – minimises total holding + ordering cost.
  \(\displaystyle EOQ = \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{H}}\) where D = annual demand, S = ordering cost per order, H = holding cost per unit per year.
• Just‑In‑Time (JIT) – aims for zero inventory; relies on reliable suppliers and flexible production.
• ABC analysis – classifies items (A = high‑value, low‑quantity; C = low‑value, high‑quantity) to focus control efforts.

5.5 Sustainability Link

• Reduced holding reduces warehouse energy use and waste from expired stock.
• JIT lowers raw‑material waste and transportation emissions.
• ABC helps target high‑impact items for greener sourcing.

5.6 Key KPI

Stock‑turnover ratio = Cost of goods sold ÷ Average inventory value. A higher ratio generally indicates efficient inventory use and lower environmental burden.

---

6. Capacity Utilisation & Outsourcing (Syllabus 4.3)

6.1 Capacity Utilisation

• Definition: % of total productive capacity that is actually used.
  \(\displaystyle \text{Capacity Utilisation} = \frac{\text{Actual Output}}{\text{Maximum Possible Output}}\times100\%\)
• Reasons for under‑capacity: seasonal demand, equipment downtime, skill shortages.
• Reasons for over‑capacity: unexpected demand spikes, poor forecasting.

6.2 Strategies to Adjust Capacity

Strategy	When Used	Sustainability Impact
Extra shifts / overtime	Short‑term demand rise	May increase energy use per hour; careful scheduling can limit waste.
Sub‑contracting	When internal capacity is insufficient for a defined period	Can reduce need for new plant, but adds transport emissions; choose low‑carbon partners.
Outsourcing	Long‑term excess capacity or non‑core activities	Potentially lowers overall resource use if the partner operates at higher efficiency.
Invest in new equipment	Sustained high demand	Modern, energy‑efficient machinery can improve both capacity and carbon intensity.

6.3 Outsourcing Decision – Cost‑Benefit Analysis (A‑Level Extension)

1. Identify the activity to outsource (e.g., logistics, component machining).
2. Estimate all relevant costs:
   • Direct cost of external provider (contract price).
   • Internal cost of managing the contract.
   • Hidden costs – quality control, communication, potential loss of flexibility.
3. Quantify benefits:
   • Cost savings (labour, capital depreciation).
   • Speed to market, access to specialised technology.
   • Environmental benefits (e.g., provider uses renewable energy).
4. Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) or Pay‑back period to assess financial viability.
5. Perform a risk assessment (reliability, IP protection, regulatory compliance).

6.4 Sustainability Considerations

• Choose partners with ISO 14001 or similar environmental certifications.
• Include carbon‑footprint clauses in contracts.
• Monitor outsourced activity KPIs alongside internal ones (e.g., emissions per unit produced).

---

7. Core Concepts – Definitions, Measurement & Typical KPIs (Consolidated)

Concept	Definition	How Measured	Typical KPI	Link to Sustainability	Key Limitation
Efficiency	Achieving the required output with the minimum possible input.	Cost per unit, energy per unit, material waste per unit.	£ / unit, kWh / unit, kg waste / unit.	Reduces resource consumption and emissions.	Does not guarantee that the product meets market needs.
Effectiveness	Degree to which organisational objectives and customer expectations are met.	Customer‑satisfaction scores, market‑share, on‑time delivery.	Net promoter score, % market share, % on‑time delivery.	Ensures sustainability claims align with consumer demand.	Can be achieved with high resource use if not balanced with efficiency.
Productivity	Ratio of output produced to the inputs used.	Output ÷ Input (e.g., units per labour‑hour).	Units / labour‑hour, revenue / capital‑invested.	Higher productivity can lower environmental intensity per unit.	Focuses on quantity, not necessarily on quality or environmental impact.
Sustainability	Operating in a way that meets present needs without compromising future generations.	Carbon footprint, water‑use intensity, waste‑diversion rate.	CO₂ kg / unit, litres water / unit, % waste recycled.	Guides strategic decisions that improve efficiency, effectiveness and productivity.	Measurement can be complex and may require external verification.

---

8. Measures to Improve the Sustainability of Operations

1. Energy‑efficiency upgrades – LED lighting, variable‑speed drives, high‑efficiency motors.
   Impact: lowers input cost → improves efficiency and reduces per‑unit emissions.
2. Process redesign (lean, Six Sigma) – eliminates waste, streamlines flow.
   Impact: raises productivity and efficiency while cutting material waste.
3. Renewable‑energy adoption – on‑site solar, wind purchase agreements.
   Impact: reduces energy cost over time, improves environmental effectiveness.
4. Supply‑chain sustainability – green procurement policies, supplier environmental audits.
   Impact: improves product eco‑effectiveness and can lower inbound material costs.
5. Product redesign for circularity – recyclable materials, modular design, take‑back schemes.
   Impact: reduces waste (efficiency) and creates new revenue streams (effectiveness).
6. Environmental Management Systems (ISO 14001) – systematic monitoring and continual improvement.
   Impact: provides data for KPI tracking across efficiency, effectiveness and productivity.
7. Employee engagement programmes – training, suggestion schemes, green teams.
   Impact: higher staff involvement lifts labour productivity and fosters a culture of continuous improvement.
8. Inventory optimisation (EOQ, JIT) – reduces holding costs and waste.
   Impact: lowers material consumption and associated emissions.
9. Capacity‑adjustment tools – flexible shift patterns, sub‑contracting with low‑carbon partners.
   Impact: matches output to demand without over‑investing in new plant, limiting embodied carbon.

---

9. Impact on Business

• Cost Savings – reduced energy, water and material use lower operating expenses and improve profit margins.
• Brand Reputation & Market Position – visible sustainability actions build trust, can justify premium pricing and open green‑market niches.
• Regulatory Compliance – proactive measures avoid fines and simplify compliance with future legislation (e.g., carbon taxes).
• Risk Management – less dependence on volatile fossil‑fuel markets; diversified supply chains reduce disruption risk.
• Innovation & Competitive Advantage – sustainability drives product redesign, new services (e.g., product‑as‑a‑service) and first‑mover status.
• Employee Morale & Talent Retention – a green workplace enhances staff pride, reduces turnover and attracts skilled workers.
• Triple Bottom Line Alignment – financial (profit), social (people) and environmental (planet) outcomes are balanced.

---

10. Financial Benefit & Cost‑Benefit Analysis Example

Scenario: A factory consumes 1 200 000 kWh of electricity per year at $0.12 per kWh. Installing LED lighting cuts consumption by 15 %.

Annual monetary saving:

\[ \text{Savings}=1{,}200{,}000 \times 0.15 \times 0.12 = \$21{,}600 \]

Carbon reduction (using 0.667 kg CO₂/kWh):

\[ \text{CO₂ avoided}=1{,}200{,}000 \times 0.15 \times 0.667 \approx 120\text{ t CO₂} \]

Cost‑Benefit Analysis Steps (A‑Level extension)

1. Identify all cash outflows – capital cost of LED retrofit, installation labour.
2. Identify cash inflows – annual energy savings, possible government rebates.
3. Calculate Pay‑back period = Capital cost ÷ Annual saving.
4. Discount future cash flows to obtain Net Present Value (NPV).
5. Compare NPV to zero – a positive NPV indicates a financially viable sustainability project.

---

11. Linking Sustainability to the Triple Bottom Line

Bottom Line	Key Sustainability Indicator	Typical Business Action
Profit	Cost per unit of output	Energy‑efficiency projects, waste minimisation, lean redesign.
People	Employee health & safety, community impact	Safe working practices, community outreach, green‑skill training.
Planet	Carbon emissions, water usage, waste‑diversion rate	Renewable‑energy adoption, water‑recycling, product circularity.

---

12. Suggested Diagram

---

13. Summary Checklist for Managers

• Map each stage of the transformational process and identify the factor of production with the highest cost or environmental impact.
• Select the most appropriate operations method (job, batch, flow, mass‑customisation) for the product mix and sustainability targets.
• Set clear, measurable sustainability objectives (e.g., 20 % reduction in CO₂ per unit within 3 years).
• Link every sustainability initiative to at least one KPI for efficiency, effectiveness or productivity.
• Integrate sustainability metrics into the regular performance dashboard alongside traditional financial KPIs.
• Apply inventory‑optimisation tools (EOQ, JIT, ABC) to reduce holding costs and waste.
• Monitor capacity utilisation; use flexible shifts, sub‑contracting or outsourcing only when they improve overall resource efficiency.
• Conduct a full cost‑benefit analysis (including pay‑back period and NPV) for any major sustainability investment.
• Engage suppliers and customers – require green procurement standards and communicate product‑environmental benefits.
• Report progress against the triple bottom line to stakeholders to reinforce brand reputation and attract talent.