Analyse how social and demographic trends affect demand, supply (including labour and input costs), competition and business objectives, and evaluate the strategic decisions that firms must make in response.
When analysing external influences, place social and demographic trends within the broader PEST framework. This helps candidates see why these trends are examined alongside political, economic and technological factors.
For each trend the table shows (i) impact on demand, supply and competition, (ii) the underlying economic mechanism (demand‑pull, cost‑push, price‑elasticity) and (iii) a brief example.
| Social Trend | Demand (what changes?) | Supply (labour/input cost impact) | Competition | Economic Mechanism | Illustrative Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changing consumer values (sustainability, ethical sourcing) | Higher willingness to pay for “green” or fair‑trade products. | Suppliers must meet ethical standards → possible rise in input costs; need for staff with sustainability expertise. | New niche entrants with ethical branding; incumbents must differentiate or risk losing market share. | Demand‑pull (shift in consumer preferences) + Cost‑push (higher compliance costs). | Unilever’s “Sustainable Living” brands outperform the group average. |
| Health and wellbeing awareness | Growth in low‑fat, organic, plant‑based, and fitness‑related goods. | Product reformulation; recruitment of nutrition scientists and quality‑control staff. | Specialist health‑food retailers and private‑label ranges increase competitive pressure. | Demand‑pull; price‑elasticity often high for premium health products. | Apple Watch health‑monitoring features drive sales of wearables. |
| Digital connectivity (social consequence of technology) | Expectation of instant information, online purchasing and personalised service. | Investment in e‑commerce platforms, data‑analytics teams and cybersecurity. | Low‑cost online rivals; “click‑and‑collect” models reshape retail competition. | Demand‑pull + Technological push (new distribution channels). | Netflix’s on‑demand streaming dominates entertainment. |
| Work‑life balance expectations | Demand for time‑saving products (ready‑made meals, subscription services). | Flexible working patterns, remote‑working technology and shift‑based staffing increase labour costs. | Firms offering flexible hours attract talent faster, gaining a competitive HR advantage. | Cost‑push (higher wages for flexible contracts) + Demand‑pull (convenience goods). | Meal‑kit providers such as HelloFresh. |
| Cultural diversity and inclusion pressures | Demand for multicultural product ranges and inclusive advertising. | Diverse recruitment; training on cultural competence; possible higher HR administration costs. | Brands perceived as inclusive capture market share in heterogeneous societies. | Demand‑pull; also a reputational cost‑push for non‑inclusive firms. | Ben & Jerry’s “Justice” flavours target diverse consumer groups. |
| Indicator | Recent Trend | Impact on Demand | Impact on Supply / Cost | Impact on Competition | Related Business Objective(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age structure | Growing proportion of 65‑plus consumers in many developed economies | Higher demand for health‑care, leisure, financial‑planning and “senior‑friendly” products. | Need for staff with specialist knowledge; higher wages for skilled care workers. | New niche entrants targeting the “silver economy”. | Economic (new market segment), Social (elder‑care welfare), Environmental (age‑friendly product design). |
| Gender | Increasing female participation in the labour force | Demand for time‑saving goods and services such as childcare, ready‑made meals. | Requirement for flexible working policies; gender‑balanced recruitment. | Employers with family‑friendly policies gain a stronger employer brand. | Social (employee welfare), Economic (productivity gains). |
| Ethnicity & multiculturalism | More ethnically diverse urban populations | Demand for ethnic foods, clothing, media and culturally relevant services. | Supply chains must accommodate a broader range of raw materials and certifications. | Early adopters of multicultural product lines capture growing market segments. | Economic (market‑share), Social (inclusion). |
| Income distribution | Widening gap between high‑ and low‑income households | Polarisation of demand – premium luxury vs. value‑for‑money products. | Cost pressures for low‑margin goods; need for efficient production techniques. | Segmented competition – luxury brands versus discount retailers. | Economic (profitability), Social (affordability). |
| Family structure | Rise in single‑person households and dual‑income families; decline in large nuclear families | Higher demand for convenience, ready‑made meals, small‑size packaging, compact housing. | Supply chains must be agile to deliver smaller lot sizes quickly. | FMCG firms that can offer convenience gain market share. | Economic (sales growth), Social (quality of life). |
| Urbanisation | Increasing share of population living in cities and megacities | Demand for public transport, urban housing, space‑efficient retail formats and digital services. | Higher real‑estate costs; need for efficient logistics and last‑mile delivery. | Urban‑focused retailers and mobility providers become strong competitors. | Economic (cost management), Environmental (reduced travel emissions). |
| Population growth | Slower growth in many developed economies; rapid growth in emerging markets | Emerging markets present new demand for consumer goods, education and infrastructure. | Supply‑chain expansion, localisation of production, managing exchange‑rate risk. | First‑mover advantage for firms entering fast‑growing economies. | Economic (growth), Social (employment creation), Environmental (sustainable expansion). |
Social and demographic trends shape the three‑bottom‑line objectives defined in the syllabus (1.4.1):
CSR policies (e.g., carbon‑neutral pledges, fair‑trade sourcing) become strategic tools for meeting both stakeholder expectations and business objectives.
Assume a retailer’s core market shifts from the 30‑40 age group (40 % of total market) to the 55‑65 age group (30 % of total market). Average spend per customer is $120 for the younger group and $150 for the older group.
\[ \Delta R = (0.30 \times 150) - (0.40 \times 120) = 45 - 48 = -3\ \text{million} \]Result: a potential $3 million revenue decline, signalling the need for product‑mix or pricing adjustments.
A fast‑food chain notes a 5 % rise in single‑person households. The price elasticity of demand for its “single‑serve” meals is –1.2. If the price is increased by 3 %:
\[ \%\Delta Q_{\text{price}} = \text{Elasticity} \times \%\Delta P = (-1.2) \times 3\% = -3.6\% \]Net change in quantity sold, accounting for the larger single‑person market:
\[ \%\Delta Q_{\text{net}} = -3.6\% + 5\% = +1.4\% \]Despite the price rise, sales of single‑serve meals increase by 1.4 %, illustrating how demographic expansion can outweigh price‑sensitivity.
Create an account or Login to take a Quiz
Log in to suggest improvements to this note.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.