Explain how changes in political and legal factors affect businesses and the decisions they make. Evaluate the impact of government actions such as privatisation, nationalisation and the use of law to control business activity.
| Factor | What it means for business | Illustrative example |
|---|---|---|
| Government stability | Predictable policy environment vs. uncertainty from frequent elections, coups or coalition changes. | Turkey’s 2023 elections caused a sharp fall in the Lira, affecting import‑cost calculations. |
| Trade policy | Tariffs, quotas, free‑trade agreements, import/export licences – affect price and market access. | EU‑Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (2019) removed most duties on automotive parts. |
| Taxation | Corporate tax rates, tax incentives, changes to VAT or excise duties – directly affect profitability. | UK corporation‑tax rise from 19 % to 20 % in 2023. |
| Subsidies & grants | Financial support for specific sectors (e.g., renewable energy, R&D) can lower costs or create new markets. | German “EEG” feed‑in tariffs for solar power. |
| Regulation of foreign investment | Restrictions, screening or incentives for overseas investors influence location decisions. | China’s “negative list” for foreign‑owned enterprises. |
| Political ideology | Free‑market vs. interventionist approaches determine the level of state involvement. | Scandinavian welfare states tend to impose higher labour standards. |
| Privatisation & nationalisation | Transfer of ownership between state and private sector – see section 4. | UK rail privatisation (1996) and French EDF partial nationalisation (1970s). |
| Legal area | Typical requirements for businesses | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Employment law | Minimum wage, working‑time limits, health & safety, discrimination, redundancy procedures. | UK National Living Wage increase 2024. |
| Consumer‑protection law | Product safety, labelling, advertising standards, rights to refunds/warranties. | EU Consumer Rights Directive (2011) on 14‑day returns. |
| Competition (antitrust) law | Prohibits monopolies, price‑fixing, market‑sharing, abuse of dominant position. | EU blocked Siemens‑Alstom merger (2019). |
| Environmental legislation | Emissions caps, waste‑disposal rules, sustainability reporting, product‑eco‑design. | EU REACH regulation on chemicals. |
| Intellectual‑property law | Patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade‑secrets – protect innovation and brand. | US Patent‑Act 1952, EU Trade‑Mark Regulation. |
| Contract law | Rules on formation, enforceability, breach and remedies – underpin all commercial agreements. | Sale of Goods Act 1979 (UK) – implied terms. |
| Area of control | Legal tools used | Typical business impact | Real‑world example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employment practices & conditions | Minimum‑wage Acts, Working‑Time Regulations, Health & Safety at Work Act, Equality legislation | Higher labour costs, need for training, shift‑pattern changes, risk of fines | UK National Living Wage rise 2024 |
| Marketing & advertising | Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) codes, Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations, tobacco/alcohol advertising bans | Limits on claims, mandatory labelling, possible withdrawal of promotional material | EU ban on TV tobacco advertising (2003) |
| Competition | Competition Act 1998, EU Competition Law, merger‑control regimes | Restrictions on mergers, price‑fixing penalties, required divestments | EU blocked Siemens‑Alstom merger (2019) |
| Location decisions | Planning permission, zoning laws, local tax incentives, environmental permits | Choice of site, additional compliance costs, possible relocation | UK “Enterprise Zones” offering tax relief |
| Specific goods & services | Licensing (pharmaceuticals, broadcasting), safety standards, import bans, age‑restriction laws | Barrier to market entry, product redesign, extra testing | EU REACH chemicals regulation |
| Aspect | Privatisation | Nationalisation |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Transfer of state‑owned enterprises to private ownership. | Transfer of privately‑owned enterprises into state ownership. |
| Typical government motives | Raise revenue, improve efficiency, reduce public‑sector borrowing. | Secure strategic control, protect jobs, ensure universal service. |
| Advantages for business | Greater competition, access to private capital, flexible management. | Stable demand (often from the state), possible subsidies, reduced market risk. |
| Disadvantages for business | Market‑driven price pressure, possible job losses, loss of public‑service focus. | Potential inefficiency, political interference, limited profit‑maximising freedom. |
| Evaluation criteria | Impact on efficiency, consumer price, innovation and fiscal balance. | Impact on strategic security, employment levels, public‑service quality. |
| Real‑world examples | UK rail privatisation (1996) – creation of private Train Operating Companies. | French EDF partial nationalisation (1970s) – state control of electricity generation. |
| Aspect | Political influence | Legal influence |
|---|---|---|
| Source | Government policy, political parties, international bodies (WTO, IMF) | Statutes, secondary legislation, case law |
| Typical frequency of change | Often linked to elections, geopolitical events, policy reviews | Can be gradual (safety standards) or abrupt (new legislation) |
| Direct impact on costs | Tax rates, tariffs, subsidies, licence fees | Compliance costs, fines, litigation expenses, insurance premiums |
| Impact on market entry | Trade agreements, foreign‑investment restrictions, political‑risk ratings | Licensing, competition‑law clearance, sector‑specific regulations |
| Strategic response | Lobbying, relocation, diversification, joint ventures with local partners | Legal audits, policy updates, staff training, contract renegotiation |
Background (2023‑24): The UK increased the main corporation‑tax rate from 19 % to 20 % and introduced a 2 % Digital Services Tax (DST) on revenues earned by online platforms. Simultaneously, the UK GDPR amendment imposed stricter data‑protection obligations.
Business responses:
The case shows how simultaneous political (tax) and legal (data‑protection) changes can force businesses to adapt strategy, operations, pricing and investment decisions.
Political and legal environments are powerful external forces that shape a business’s cost structure, market opportunities and operational requirements. Managers must continuously scan for policy shifts, legislative reforms and government actions such as privatisation or nationalisation, assess their implications, and adjust strategic, operational, financial and HR decisions accordingly to stay competitive and compliant.
Create an account or Login to take a Quiz
Log in to suggest improvements to this note.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.