8.1 Marketing Analysis – Sales Forecasting
8.1.1 Purpose of a Sales Forecast
- Provides the quantitative basis for setting realistic marketing objectives (sales, market‑share, profit, budget).
- Helps allocate resources – advertising spend, distribution channels, staffing levels.
- Informs product‑development decisions – size of launch, R&D investment, production capacity.
- Acts as a benchmark for performance monitoring and control.
8.1.2 Demand‑Side and Supply‑Side Drivers
| Demand‑side drivers | Supply‑side constraints |
- Price of the product and of substitutes.
- Consumer income and purchasing power.
- Tastes, preferences and lifestyle trends.
- Population size, demographics and geographic concentration.
- Seasonality and weather patterns.
- Advertising, promotion and brand perception.
|
- Production capacity and plant utilisation.
- Availability and cost of raw materials.
- Technology and automation levels.
- Supplier reliability and lead‑times.
- Distribution network efficiency.
- Regulatory or legal restrictions.
|
8.1.3 Forecasting Methods
Quantitative Forecasting (requires reliable historical data)
Statistical techniques that generate a numerical forecast.
Checking Forecast Accuracy
After a forecast is produced, its reliability is assessed using simple error‑measurement tools required by the Cambridge syllabus.
| Measure | Formula | Interpretation |
| Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) |
$$\text{MAD}= \frac{1}{n}\sum_{t=1}^{n}\big|A_{t}-F_{t}\big|$$ |
Average absolute forecast error – lower MAD = more accurate. |
| Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) |
$$\text{MAPE}= \frac{100\%}{n}\sum_{t=1}^{n}\frac{\big|A_{t}-F_{t}\big|}{A_{t}}$$ |
Expresses error as a percentage of actual sales; useful for comparing forecasts of different sizes. |
| Tracking Signal |
$$\text{TS}= \frac{\sum_{t=1}^{n}(A_{t}-F_{t})}{\text{MAD}}$$ |
Indicates whether a forecast is consistently biased (TS > ±4 suggests a problem). |
Qualitative Forecasting (judgement‑based)
Used when data are scarce, the product is new, or the market is rapidly changing.
- Delphi Method – iterative questionnaire rounds with an expert panel; anonymity reduces group‑think.
- Sales‑Force Opinion – front‑line staff estimate demand from customer contacts.
- Market‑Research Surveys – consumer questionnaires or focus groups that capture purchase intentions.
- Executive Opinion – senior managers apply strategic insight.
- Historical Analogy – compare the new product with a previously launched, similar product.
Steps in Conducting a Qualitative Forecast
- Define the forecasting horizon (short‑term ≤ 12 months, medium‑term 1‑3 years, long‑term > 3 years).
- Select the most appropriate technique(s) for the product and market.
- Identify and brief participants (experts, sales staff, consumers).
- Collect opinions using questionnaires, interviews or workshops.
- Summarise responses, look for common themes and calculate a consensus figure (average, median or weighted average).
- Present the forecast as a single figure, a range, or a set of scenarios (optimistic, realistic, pessimistic).
- Review and update regularly as new data become available.
Advantages & Disadvantages of Qualitative Methods
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
- Quick to produce when historical data are unavailable.
- Can incorporate non‑quantifiable factors (brand perception, upcoming legislation).
- Useful for new‑product launches and volatile markets.
- Relatively low cost compared with extensive data collection.
|
- Highly subjective – risk of personal bias.
- Limited statistical reliability; difficult to test accuracy.
- Depends on the expertise and honesty of participants.
- Hard to validate against actual outcomes.
|
8.1.4 Elasticity and Its Use in Forecasting
Elasticities measure how a change in one variable (price, income, promotion) influences the quantity demanded.
- Price Elasticity of Demand (PED)
$$\text{PED}= \frac{\%\Delta Q}{\%\Delta P}$$
If |PED| > 1 demand is elastic; if |PED| < 1 demand is inelastic.
- Income Elasticity of Demand (YED)
$$\text{YED}= \frac{\%\Delta Q}{\%\Delta I}$$
Positive YED > 0 indicates a normal good; YED < 0 indicates an inferior good.
- Advertising (Promotional) Elasticity (AED)
$$\text{AED}= \frac{\%\Delta Q}{\%\Delta A}$$
Shows the percentage change in sales for a 1 % change in advertising spend.
Applying Elasticities to a Forecast
- Start with a base quantitative forecast (e.g., 130 000 units).
- Adjust for planned price change:
$$\text{Adjusted Forecast}=130\,000 \times \bigl(1+ \text{PED}\times\%\Delta P\bigr)$$
- Further adjust for expected income growth or advertising budget using YED and AED in the same way.
Example: Base forecast = 130 000 units. Planned price reduction = 5 % and PED = ‑1.4.
Adjusted forecast = 130 000 × [1 + (‑1.4 × ‑0.05)] = 130 000 × 1.07 ≈ 139 200 units.
8.1.5 Linking Forecasts to Product Development
- Scale of launch – the forecast determines the initial production volume and the size of the first‑year budget for raw materials and labour.
- R&D investment – a higher forecast justifies greater spending on product refinement, packaging design, or new features.
- Timing of introduction – seasonal forecasts help decide whether to launch in a high‑demand period (e.g., summer for soft drinks) or to stagger releases.
- Capacity planning – forecasts are compared with existing plant utilisation; if demand exceeds capacity, the firm may plan plant expansion or outsource production.
8.1.6 Market Research – Primary & Secondary Data
Both types of data feed into quantitative and qualitative forecasts.
- Primary Research – data collected specifically for the forecast.
- Surveys, questionnaires, face‑to‑face interviews.
- Focus groups and observation.
- Test‑market sales figures.
- Secondary Research – existing data not originally collected for the forecast.
- Industry reports, government statistics, trade publications.
- Competitor annual accounts and market‑share data.
- Historical sales data from the company’s own records.
From Research to a Numerical Forecast
- Convert purchase‑intention percentages into units:
$$\text{Forecast Units}= \frac{\text{% intending to buy}\times \text{Target Population}}{100}$$
- Use secondary market‑size figures to estimate total market demand, then apply a desired market‑share target to obtain a sales figure.
- Adjust the raw figure for known supply‑side constraints (capacity, lead‑time) and for elasticity effects (price, income, promotion).
Sampling, Reliability & Bias
The quality of primary data depends on the sampling method.
| Sampling Issue | Effect on Forecast |
| Non‑representative sample (e.g., only high‑income respondents) |
Skewed demand estimate; over‑ or under‑forecasting. |
| Small sample size |
Low reliability; high margin of error. |
| Response bias (social desirability, leading questions) |
Inflated purchase‑intention figures. |
| Sampling error (random variation) |
Uncertainty range that should be reflected in the forecast. |
To improve reliability:
- Use stratified random sampling to reflect key market segments.
- Pilot test questionnaires to remove ambiguous wording.
- Calculate confidence intervals (e.g., 95 % confidence level) and report them with the forecast.
8.1.7 Illustrative Examples
Quantitative Example – 4‑Period Centre Moving Average
Monthly sales (000 units) for the past six months: 112, 118, 124, 130, 136, 142.
4‑period centred moving average for month 4:
$$\text{MA}_{4}= \frac{112+118+124+130}{4}=121\text{ (000 units)}$$
The marketing team sets a short‑term sales objective of 122 000 units for month 5 and uses the figure as a baseline for budgeting.
Quantitative Example – Applying Price Elasticity
Base forecast = 130 000 units. Planned price increase = 4 % and PED = ‑1.2.
$$\text{Adjusted Forecast}=130\,000 \times \bigl[1+(-1.2\times0.04)\bigr]=130\,000 \times 0.952 = 123\,760\text{ units}$$
Qualitative Example – Delphi Method
A beverage company runs two Delphi rounds with five industry experts to forecast a new eco‑friendly sports drink.
Round 1 forecasts (thousands of units): 120, 135, 150, 140, 130.
After feedback, Round 2 forecasts: 138, 145, 152, 148, 140.
Consensus forecast (average of Round 2):
$$\frac{138+145+152+148+140}{5}=144.6\text{ thousand units}$$
The firm plans production of 145 000 units for the first year and targets a 4 % market share of a 3.6 million‑unit market.
8.1.8 Choosing the Right Approach
- Quantitative – established products, abundant reliable historical data, need for statistical accuracy.
- Qualitative – new‑product launches, entry into unfamiliar markets, rapid decision‑making, volatile external environment.
- Hybrid (Quantitative + Qualitative) – combine a time‑series forecast with expert adjustments to reflect upcoming market changes (e.g., competitor entry, regulatory shift).
8.1.9 Key Take‑aways
- Sales forecasts translate market information into concrete marketing objectives, budgets, and product‑development plans.
- Both demand‑side drivers (price, income, tastes, etc.) and supply‑side constraints (capacity, raw‑materials) must be considered.
- Quantitative methods rely on historical data; each technique has specific limitations and should be checked with accuracy measures (MAD, MAPE, tracking signal).
- Qualitative methods rely on expert judgement; they are essential for new products or rapidly changing markets but must be documented and periodically reviewed.
- Elasticity coefficients allow forecasters to model the impact of price, income and promotional changes on sales.
- Primary and secondary market research provides the raw data; proper sampling, reliability checks and conversion of percentages to units are crucial for a credible forecast.
- Regular monitoring, updating and, where appropriate, blending of quantitative and qualitative techniques give the most accurate and flexible forecasts for A‑Level business planning.