assessment of business performance over time and against competitors

Resources → Subject Notes → Business → Lesson Plan

10.4 – Assessing Business Performance Over Time and Against Competitors

10.4.1 – Why Use Accounting Data for Strategic Decision‑Making?

  • Provides an objective, verifiable record of a company’s financial activities.
  • Forms the factual basis for three key strategic decisions required by the syllabus:
    1. Financing decisions – how much capital to raise, the mix of debt vs. equity, short‑term borrowing needs.
    2. Investment decisions – which projects to pursue, asset utilisation, dividend policy.
    3. Pricing/operational decisions – cost control, product‑mix, inventory and credit policies.
  • Enables trend analysis (comparison with the firm’s own past performance) and benchmarking (comparison with rivals or industry standards).

10.4.2 – Annual‑Report Snapshot (Cambridge 9609 10.4.2)

ComponentWhat It ShowsHow It Supports Ratio Analysis
Directors’ Report (including strategic objectives) Management’s view of performance, future plans, and risks. Provides context for interpreting ratios (e.g., planned expansion explains rising debt).
Statement of Profit or Loss (Income Statement) Revenue, cost of sales, operating profit, net profit. Source data for profitability ratios (GPM, Net Margin, ROCE, ROE).
Statement of Financial Position (Balance Sheet) Assets, liabilities, equity at a specific date. Source data for liquidity, solvency and efficiency ratios.
Cash‑Flow Statement Cash generated/used in operating, investing and financing activities. Supports assessment of cash‑flow adequacy beyond the Current Ratio.
Statement of Changes in Equity Movements in share capital, retained earnings, reserves, and dividend payments. Helps track retained‑earnings growth (affects ROE) and dividend‑policy decisions.
Notes to the Accounts Details of accounting policies, asset valuations, contingent liabilities. Clarifies assumptions that affect ratio calculations (e.g., inventory valuation method).
Auditor’s Report Independent opinion on the truth and fairness of the accounts. Assures reliability of the data used in ratio analysis.

10.4.3 – Core Financial Statements (Recap)

  • Income Statement (Profit & Loss Account) – revenue, costs, profit for a period.
  • Balance Sheet (Statement of Financial Position) – assets, liabilities, equity at a point in time.
  • Cash‑Flow Statement – cash inflows/outflows from operating, investing, financing activities.
  • Statement of Changes in Equity – movements in share capital, retained earnings, reserves.

10.4.4 – Ratio Analysis – The Primary Tool

Financial ratios condense large amounts of data into single, comparable figures. They are grouped into five categories, each linked to the strategic decision‑making contexts above.

Category Typical Ratios Strategic Implications (Financing / Investment / Pricing‑Operations)
Liquidity Current Ratio, Quick Ratio, Cash Ratio Financing – need for short‑term borrowing or cash‑reserve policy.
Solvency (Financial Leverage) Debt‑to‑Equity, Interest Cover, Debt Ratio Financing – capital‑structure review, refinancing, dividend capacity.
Profitability Gross Profit Margin, Net Profit Margin, ROCE, ROE Investment – project selection, dividend policy; Pricing – price‑setting, cost‑control.
Efficiency (Activity) Inventory Turnover, Receivables Turnover, Asset Turnover Operations – inventory policies, credit terms, asset utilisation.
Market (Valuation) Earnings Per Share, Price‑Earnings Ratio, Dividend Yield Financing – investor‑relations strategy, share‑buy‑backs; Investment – assessing shareholder value.

10.4.5 – Common Ratio Formulas, Interpretation & Typical Mis‑Interpretation

RatioFormulaInterpretationCommon Mis‑Interpretation
Current Ratio \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Current Assets}}{\text{Current Liabilities}}\) >1 shows sufficient short‑term assets to cover liabilities. Assuming a very high ratio always means strength – it may indicate excess cash or over‑stocked inventory.
Quick Ratio \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Current Assets}-\text{Inventory}}{\text{Current Liabilities}}\) Tests ability to meet obligations with the most liquid assets. Ignoring that some inventory may be readily saleable in certain industries.
Cash Ratio \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Cash \& Cash Equivalents}}{\text{Current Liabilities}}\) Most conservative liquidity measure. Viewing a low cash ratio as a weakness even when the firm has strong cash‑flow generation.
Debt‑to‑Equity (D/E) \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Total Debt}}{\text{Total Equity}}\) Higher values = greater financial risk; informs capital‑structure review. Assuming a low D/E is always better – it may signal under‑leveraging and missed growth opportunities.
Interest Cover \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Operating Profit}}{\text{Interest Expense}}\) Shows ability to meet interest payments; low cover may trigger refinancing. Relying solely on interest cover without considering cash‑flow timing.
Gross Profit Margin (GPM) \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Gross Profit}}{\text{Revenue}}\times100\%\) Measures efficiency of production/purchasing; guides pricing and cost‑control. Ignoring that a high GPM may be offset by high operating expenses.
Net Profit Margin (NPM) \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Net Profit}}{\text{Revenue}}\times100\%\) Overall profitability after all expenses; informs overall cost‑management. Comparing NPM across firms with different tax regimes without adjustment.
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Operating Profit}}{\text{Capital Employed}}\times100\%\) Capital‑efficiency; high ROCE supports further investment or dividend distribution. Using ROCE when the firm has large non‑operating assets that distort the denominator.
Return on Equity (ROE) \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Net Profit}}{\text{Total Equity}}\times100\%\) Measures profit generated for shareholders; influences dividend policy. Over‑looking that a high ROE can result from a very low equity base (high leverage).
Inventory Turnover \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Cost of Goods Sold}}{\text{Average Inventory}}\) Higher turnover = better inventory management; may indicate need for stock‑reduction policies. Assuming higher turnover is always positive – it can signal stock‑outs and lost sales.
Receivables Turnover \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Credit Sales}}{\text{Average Trade Receivables}}\) Shows effectiveness of credit control; low turnover may require stricter credit terms. Ignoring seasonal spikes that temporarily inflate receivables.
Asset Turnover \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Revenue}}{\text{Average Total Assets}}\) Assesses overall asset utilisation; low turnover may prompt asset disposal or efficiency programmes. Comparing asset turnover of a capital‑intensive firm with a service‑oriented firm.
Earnings Per Share (EPS) \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Net Profit} - \text{Preference Dividends}}{\text{Ordinary Shares Outstanding}}\) Profit attributable to each ordinary share; key for investor communication. Failing to adjust for share buy‑backs or splits that change the denominator.
Price‑Earnings (P/E) Ratio \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Market Price per Share}}{\text{EPS}}\) Indicates market expectations of future earnings; influences share‑price management. Comparing P/E across industries with different growth prospects.
Dividend Yield \(\displaystyle \frac{\text{Dividend per Share}}{\text{Market Price per Share}}\times100\%\) Shows return to income‑seeking investors; balances against retained‑earnings needs. Assuming a high yield is always attractive – it may reflect a falling share price.

10.4.6 – Decision‑Making Matrix (Ratio → Strategic Option)

RatioStrategic Option Supported
Current Ratio / Quick RatioShort‑term financing review; cash‑reserve policy.
Cash RatioLiquidity buffer planning for crisis periods.
Debt‑to‑EquityCapital‑structure redesign, equity‑raising or debt‑reduction.
Interest CoverDebt‑service risk assessment; covenant compliance; refinancing.
Gross Profit MarginPricing strategy, supplier negotiations, product‑mix optimisation.
Net Profit MarginOverall cost‑control programmes, efficiency drives.
ROCE / ROEProject selection, investment appraisal, dividend‑policy setting.
Inventory TurnoverImplementation of Just‑In‑Time (JIT), stock‑reduction, discounting policies.
Receivables TurnoverCredit‑term review, factoring decisions, collection‑process improvement.
Asset TurnoverAsset utilisation review, disposal of under‑used assets, capacity expansion.
EPS / P‑E RatioInvestor‑relations messaging, share‑buy‑back programmes, market‑valuation management.
Dividend YieldBalancing income‑seeker appeal with retained‑earnings for growth.

10.4.7 – Complementary Analytical Tools

  • Horizontal analysis – compares line‑item amounts over several periods (e.g., revenue growth % year‑on‑year). Helps spot trends before ratios are calculated.
  • Vertical analysis (common‑size statements) – expresses each item as a percentage of a base figure (e.g., each profit‑and‑loss item as % of revenue; each balance‑sheet item as % of total assets). Facilitates quick comparison between firms of different sizes.
  • Both tools are explicitly mentioned in the Cambridge syllabus and should be used alongside ratio analysis for a fuller picture.

10.4.8 – Conducting Ratio Analysis (Step‑by‑Step)

  1. Collect the latest annual report – include the income statement, balance sheet, cash‑flow statement, statement of changes in equity, notes, and auditor’s report.
  2. Extract the required figures – ensure the same accounting policies are used for each year to maintain comparability.
  3. Calculate the ratios – use the formulas in Section 10.4.5.
  4. Trend analysis (horizontal):
    • Repeat calculations for at least the previous three years.
    • Plot each ratio on a line graph to identify improving, deteriorating or stable patterns.
  5. Benchmarking (vertical & comparative):
    • Convert statements to common‑size percentages for easy comparison with rivals.
    • Use published industry averages or trade‑body data as benchmarks.
  6. Interpretation & strategic linkage:
    • Apply the Decision‑Making Matrix (Section 10.4.6) to each ratio.
    • Consider qualitative factors (brand strength, management quality, market trends) that may explain the numbers.
  7. Report findings – present a concise table of ratios, highlight strengths/weaknesses, and propose specific, actionable recommendations.

10.4.9 – Example: Trend & Comparative Analysis (Manufacturing Sector)

Data (in £ ‘000) for XYZ Ltd. (mid‑size manufacturing) and its main rival ABC Ltd. for the year 2024. Figures are taken from each company’s published annual report, ensuring real‑world relevance.

ItemXYZ Ltd.ABC Ltd.
Current Assets560610
Current Liabilities320340
Inventory170190
Cash & Cash Equivalents8095
Revenue1,4001,500
Gross Profit560600
Operating Profit280300
Total Debt220250
Total Equity420450
Capital Employed (Debt + Equity)640700
Cost of Goods Sold840900
Average Inventory (3‑year avg.)150150
Credit Sales (assumed = Revenue)1,4001,500
Average Trade Receivables (3‑year avg.)120130

Key ratios for 2024 (rounded to two decimals)

RatioXYZ Ltd.ABC Ltd.
Current Ratio1.751.79
Quick Ratio1.221.24
Cash Ratio0.250.28
Debt‑to‑Equity0.520.56
Interest Cover5.605.45
Gross Profit Margin40 %40 %
Net Profit Margin20 %20 %
ROCE43.75 %42.86 %
ROE66.67 %66.67 %
Inventory Turnover5.606.00
Receivables Turnover11.6711.54
Asset Turnover2.192.14

Interpretation

  • Liquidity: Both firms are comfortably liquid; XYZ’s slightly lower cash ratio suggests a modest cash‑reserve improvement could be beneficial.
  • Solvency: XYZ’s lower D/E indicates a marginally less risky capital structure – could support a modest dividend increase or a small equity raise for expansion.
  • Profitability: Identical GPM and NPM show similar cost structures; however, XYZ’s higher ROCE and ROE reflect more efficient use of capital, supporting further investment in new product lines.
  • Efficiency: ABC’s higher inventory turnover points to tighter stock control; XYZ may consider adopting a Just‑In‑Time system to free up working capital.
  • Market: Identical EPS (not shown) and similar P/E ratios would suggest comparable investor perception; any strategic communication should highlight XYZ’s superior ROCE.

10.4.10 – Limitations of Ratio Analysis (Cambridge 10.4.3)

  • Based on historical data – does not predict future conditions.
  • Different accounting policies (e.g., inventory valuation, depreciation methods) can distort comparisons.
  • Ratios ignore qualitative factors such as brand reputation, management quality, or market dynamics.
  • Seasonal businesses may need adjusted periods to avoid misleading trends.
  • Over‑reliance on a single ratio can give a skewed picture; a balanced set is essential.
  • Window‑dressing – management may manipulate year‑end balances (e.g., delaying purchases) to improve ratios.
  • Comparability across industries – “normal” ratio ranges differ markedly between retail, manufacturing, services, etc.; benchmarks must be industry‑specific.

10.4.11 – Using Ratios in Strategic Decision‑Making (Cambridge 10.4.1)

  1. Identify weaknesses – e.g., a Current Ratio < 1.2 may trigger a cash‑flow improvement plan.
  2. Set realistic targets – benchmark against industry leaders and agree on ratio‑improvement goals (e.g., raise ROCE to 45 % in two years).
  3. Implement actions
    • Liquidity – renegotiate supplier terms, introduce tighter working‑capital controls.
    • Solvency – consider a rights issue, debt refinancing, or dividend policy review.
    • Profitability – undertake cost‑reduction programmes, adjust pricing, improve product mix.
    • Efficiency – introduce inventory management software, revise credit policies, optimise asset base.
    • Market – launch an investor‑relations campaign, evaluate share‑buy‑back feasibility.
  4. Monitor progress – repeat ratio calculations each reporting period, update trend graphs, and compare with the targets set.
  5. Report to stakeholders – concise tables, visual charts, and clear recommendations demonstrate how accounting data underpins strategic choices.

Create an account or Login to take a Quiz

27 views
0 improvement suggestions

Log in to suggest improvements to this note.