a simple explanation of human need

Motivation – Human Needs

Objective: Provide a concise, syllabus‑aligned explanation of human needs, the main motivation theories that incorporate those needs, and how managers can apply this knowledge in the workplace.

2.2.2 Human Need – Simple Explanation

A human need is an internal state of perceived deficiency. When a need is felt, the individual is motivated to act in order to satisfy it. Needs are the starting point for all motivation theories covered in the Cambridge 9609 syllabus (section 2.2).

2.2.3 Motivation Theories

Motivation theories are grouped into content theories (what motivates people) and process theories (how motivation works). The table below summarises each theory, its historical context, the type of theory, the primary needs it addresses, a typical workplace example, and a brief limitation.

Theory (Year) Historical Context Type Key Need(s) Addressed Typical Workplace Example Key Limitation
Taylor – Scientific Management (1911) Early‑20th c industrial revolution; focus on efficiency and standardisation. Content Financial / physiological Piece‑rate pay, time‑and‑motion studies. Over‑emphasises monetary incentives and ignores social/psychological needs.
Mayo – Human Relations (1930s) Hawthorne studies; reaction against the mechanistic view of work. Content Social (belonging) Team‑building activities, supportive supervision. May overstate the impact of social factors and underplay individual differences.
Maslow – Hierarchy of Needs (1943) Post‑war humanistic psychology; need‑fulfilment model. Content All five levels (physiological → self‑actualisation) Progressive reward system from basic wages to career development. Rigid ordering and strong Western cultural bias; needs can be pursued simultaneously.
Herzberg – Two‑Factor Theory (1959) Motivation‑hygiene research in 1950s US manufacturing. Content Hygiene (safety, security) & Motivators (esteem, growth) Safe work environment + recognition programmes. Difficulty separating hygiene factors from motivators; relies on self‑reported data.
McClelland – Learned Needs Theory (1961) Mid‑20th c focus on achievement motivation. Content Achievement, Power, Affiliation (acquired needs) Target‑based bonuses, leadership roles, collaborative projects. Ignores possible innate components; measurement of needs can be problematic.
Alderfer – ERG Theory (1969) Simplification of Maslow during the rise of organisational behaviour research. Content Existence, Relatedness, Growth (condensed Maslow) Competitive salary, mentorship, personal‑development courses. Categories remain vague; the “regression” hypothesis is not consistently observed.
Vroom – Expectancy Theory (1964) Cognitive approach to motivation emerging in the 1960s. Process Link between effort, performance and reward Clear performance targets + transparent reward system. Assumes rational decision‑making; difficult to quantify expectancy, instrumentality and valence.

2.2.4 Motivation Methods – Financial & Non‑Financial

  • Financial (extrinsic) motivators
    • Basic wage – satisfies physiological & safety needs.
    • Performance‑related pay, bonuses – address esteem and achievement needs.
    • Profit‑sharing, stock options – appeal to power and growth needs.
  • Non‑financial (intrinsic) motivators
    • Job enrichment & autonomy – support self‑actualisation and growth.
    • Recognition programmes, awards – fulfil esteem.
    • Teamwork, mentoring, social events – meet belonging and relatedness.
    • Training & career‑development opportunities – satisfy growth and achievement.

Applying Need Theories to Business Decision‑Making

  1. Need Analysis – Use surveys, interviews or observation to identify the dominant need level for each employee or workgroup.
  2. Objective Setting – Align departmental objectives with the identified needs (e.g., safety‑focused objectives for employees whose primary need is security).
  3. Target Setting – Set specific, measurable targets that reflect the need focus (e.g., achievement‑oriented targets for high‑achievement individuals).
  4. Performance Appraisal – Evaluate using criteria that match the need focus; combine financial rewards (for hygiene/esteem needs) with non‑financial feedback (for growth/self‑actualisation).
  5. Review & Adjust – Monitor changes in needs over time and modify objectives, targets and rewards accordingly.

Critical Evaluation – Limitations of Need‑Based Theories

  • Cultural bias: Maslow’s hierarchy reflects Western individualism; collectivist cultures may prioritise belonging over esteem.
  • Rigid ordering: Empirical evidence shows that needs can be pursued simultaneously rather than strictly sequentially.
  • Overlap of categories: ERG’s three categories blur distinctions between Maslow’s levels, reducing diagnostic precision.
  • Learning vs. innate: McClelland assumes needs are acquired, yet some research suggests a biological component to achievement motivation.
  • Situational factors: Vroom’s expectancy theory highlights that motivation also depends on perceived links between effort, performance and reward, which need theories alone do not explain.

Simple Explanation Summary

Human needs are internal deficiency states that drive behaviour. By understanding the range of need‑based content theories (Taylor, Mayo, Maslow, Herzberg, McClelland, ERG) and the process perspective of Vroom, managers can select appropriate financial and non‑financial motivators, set relevant objectives, define clear targets, and conduct performance appraisals that match employees’ dominant needs. This systematic approach improves engagement, productivity, and overall business performance while recognising the limitations of each theory.

Suggested diagram: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs pyramid – from Physiological at the base to Self‑Actualisation at the top.

Create an account or Login to take a Quiz

27 views
0 improvement suggestions

Log in to suggest improvements to this note.