Describe the hardware that is used to support the Internet, explain why each device is required, and relate it to the wider networking concepts set out in the Cambridge 9618 syllabus.
| Aspect | LAN (Local Area Network) | WAN (Wide Area Network) |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic scope | Single building or campus (≤ 10 km) | City, country, or global (tens to thousands of km) |
| Typical latency | 1 ms – 5 ms | 20 ms – 200 ms (or more for satellite) |
| Primary devices | NICs, switches, hubs, WAPs, bridges | Routers, leased‑line modems, satellite dishes, MPLS switches |
| Media | Copper (twisted‑pair), fibre‑optic, Wi‑Fi | Leased copper/fibre lines, microwave links, satellite, under‑sea cables |
| Management | Often under a single administrative domain | Multiple organisations (ISPs, carriers) with contractual SLAs |
| Typical bandwidth | 100 Mbps – 10 Gbps (or higher in data‑centres) | 10 Mbps – 100 Gbps (backbone), variable for last‑mile access |
| Topology | Physical layout | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus | All devices share a single coaxial or twisted‑pair cable. | Simple, inexpensive, easy to extend. | Single point of failure, limited bandwidth, difficult troubleshooting. |
| Star | Each device connects to a central hub or switch. | Easy management, fault isolation, scalable. | More cabling; central device is a point of failure (mitigated with redundant switches). |
| Mesh | Multiple redundant paths between devices (full or partial). | High reliability, load balancing, fault tolerance. | Complex, costly, difficult to install. |
| Hybrid | Combination of two or more basic topologies (e.g., star‑bus). | Can be tailored to specific requirements. | Design and management can be complex. |
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (32 bits) – split into network and host portions.
Destination Subnet Mask Next Hop Interface
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 203.0.113.1 eth0 (default route)
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 eth1 (directly connected)
10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 203.0.113.2 eth0
| Aspect | Client‑Server | Peer‑to‑Peer |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Dedicated servers provide resources; clients request services. | All nodes can act as both client and server; resources are shared directly. |
| Typical uses | Web browsing, email, online banking, cloud services. | File‑sharing (e.g., BitTorrent), VoIP, distributed computing. |
| Device types | Thin client vs. thick (fat) client. | Each peer usually runs a “thick” client with comparable capabilities. |
| Advantages | Centralised control, easier security management, scalable with load balancers. | Reduced server cost, resilience (no single point of failure), higher local bandwidth. |
| Disadvantages | Server can become a bottleneck; requires robust infrastructure. | Security harder to enforce; performance depends on peers’ availability. |
www.example.com) into IP addresses.protocol://host:port/path?query#fragment
http, https, ftp, …| Aspect | Wired (Ethernet) | Wireless (Wi‑Fi) |
|---|---|---|
| Medium | Copper twisted‑pair or fibre‑optic cable. | Radio‑frequency (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, 6 GHz). |
| Standards | IEEE 802.3 – 10 Mbps to 400 Gbps. | IEEE 802.11ax (Wi‑Fi 6/6E), 802.11be (Wi‑Fi 7) – up to 30 Gbps. |
| Access method | CSMA/CD (collision detection) – largely replaced by full‑duplex switching. | CSMA/CA (collision avoidance) – uses acknowledgements and back‑off. |
| Bandwidth & latency | Higher, more predictable; latency typically < 1 ms on a LAN. | Variable; affected by interference, distance, and channel congestion. |
| Security | Physical security; optional MAC filtering. | Encryption (WPA3), authentication (802.1X), MAC filtering. |
| Installation | Requires cabling and conduit; higher upfront cost. | Flexibility, easier to deploy for mobile devices. |
Create an account or Login to take a Quiz
Log in to suggest improvements to this note.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.