The design cycle is the backbone of the syllabus. Each stage links directly to the Assessment Objectives (AO) and to the two exam components.
| Stage | What You Do | Relevant AO(s) | Exam Component(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Identify the Need | Research, observe, interview users, analyse market trends. | AO1 – knowledge of needs & user context | Component 2 (portfolio) – evidence of need analysis |
| 2. Write a Design Brief | State the problem, target users, constraints and success criteria. | AO1, AO2 – clear brief & justification | Component 2 |
| 3. Develop a Specification | Create measurable, testable criteria (e.g., strength ≥ 30 N, cost ≤ £5). | AO1, AO2 – specification formulation | Component 2 |
| 4. Generate Ideas | Sketch, mind‑map, brainstorm, use CAD/CAM. | AO2 – creative development | Component 2 |
| 5. Select a Preferred Solution | Evaluate ideas against the specification (Pugh matrix, weighted decision matrix). | AO2, AO3 – decision‑making & justification | Component 2 |
| 6. Plan the Development | Work‑record, timetable/Gantt chart, risk assessment, material list. | AO2 – planning & resource allocation | Component 2 |
| 7. Make a Prototype / Final Product | Apply appropriate techniques (cutting, joining, shaping, programming, etc.). | AO2 – practical making | Component 2 (practical product) |
| 8. Test and Evaluate | Testing, user feedback, cost analysis; decide on redesign, production or stop. | AO3 – analysis, evaluation, improvement | Component 1 (written) & Component 2 (evaluation report) |
These topics are examined in both components of the syllabus.
| Topic | Key Points to Cover |
|---|---|
| Need Analysis & Design Brief | Problem identification, target market, constraints, success criteria; use of primary/secondary research. |
| Specification | Measurable, testable criteria; primary vs. secondary; weighting of criteria. |
| Idea Generation & Development | Sketches, CAD, 3‑D modelling, brainstorming, morphological charts, mind‑maps. |
| Selection & Decision‑Making | Pugh matrix, weighted decision matrix, risk/benefit analysis, justification of the chosen solution. |
| Planning & Project Management | Work‑record pages, Gantt chart/timetable, resource allocation, detailed risk‑assessment checklist. |
| Communication | Technical drawings (orthographic, isometric, exploded), annotated sketches, bill of materials, presentation boards, use of standard drawing symbols. |
| Use of Technology | CAD/CAM software, laser cutting, 3‑D printing, micro‑controllers, power tools – safety, maintenance and tool selection. |
| Sustainability & Ethics | Life‑cycle analysis, material sourcing, waste reduction, social impact, ethical sourcing, design for disassembly. |
| Health & Safety (Expanded) |
|
| Material | Key Properties | Common Uses |
|---|---|---|
| Softwood (e.g., pine) | Low density, good workability, moderate strength | Furniture, simple joinery |
| Hardwood (e.g., oak) | High density, high strength, good wear resistance | Load‑bearing furniture, flooring |
| Mild steel | High tensile strength, magnetic, weldable | Frames, brackets |
| Stainless steel | Corrosion‑resistant, high strength, non‑magnetic | Kitchenware, medical devices |
| LDPE (low‑density polyethylene) | Flexible, low melting point, water‑resistant | Packaging, flexible containers |
| HDPE (high‑density polyethylene) | Stiff, high impact resistance, chemical resistant | Bottle caps, piping |
| Thermosetting polymer (e.g., epoxy) | Hard, heat‑resistant, non‑re‑meltable | Adhesives, laminates |
| Composite (fiberglass, carbon fibre) | High strength‑to‑weight, directional properties | Aerospace parts, sports equipment |
Key Content for All Systems & Control Candidates
Specialist Focus Areas (Examples)
Use this checklist to ensure every required piece of evidence is included and clearly linked to the seven marking criteria.
| Stage | Evidence Required | Typical Page Count | Marking Criterion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Need Analysis | Observations, interviews, market research, problem statement. | 1–2 pages | Identification of need |
| Design Brief & Specification | Brief (max 150 words), specification table with measurable criteria. | 1 page | Specification development |
| Idea Generation | Sketches, mind‑maps, CAD screenshots, idea log. | 2–3 pages | Idea generation & development |
| Idea Selection | Pugh matrix or weighted decision matrix, justification. | 1 page | Selection & justification |
| Planning | Work‑record, timetable/Gantt chart, risk assessment, material list. | 2 pages | Planning & project management |
| Making / Prototyping | Step‑by‑step photos, process notes, tools used, safety checks. | 3–5 pages | Making (practical product) |
| Testing & Evaluation | Test plan, data tables, user‑feedback forms, cost analysis, evaluation report. | 3–4 pages | Testing & evaluation (AO3) |
| Final Presentation | Conclusion, improvements, reflection, bibliography. | 1–2 pages | Overall presentation & reflection |
Testing measures the product against the performance criteria set out in the specification. It can be quantitative (numeric data) or qualitative (observational).
Gathering opinions from intended users provides insight into usability, aesthetics and overall satisfaction.
Cost analysis checks whether the product can be produced within the budget and highlights high‑cost items.
Formula:
$$\text{Total Cost} = \text{Material Cost} + \text{Labour Cost} + \text{Overheads}$$
| Method | Purpose | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Testing | Measure performance against objective criteria. | Quantitative, repeatable, directly linked to specification. | May need specialised equipment; can be time‑consuming. |
| User Feedback | Assess usability, aesthetics and user satisfaction. | Captures real‑world experience; highlights issues not evident in tests. | Subjective; depends on sample size and question quality. |
| Cost Analysis | Determine financial viability and identify cost‑saving opportunities. | Links design decisions to budget; essential for commercial products. | Relies on accurate price data; may overlook intangible costs (e.g., brand value). |
The IGCSE Design & Technology assessment is split into three papers (if the specialist paper is taken) and a coursework component.
| Component | Weight | Format | Assessment Objectives (AO) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component 1 – Paper 1 (Common Content) | 25 % | 2‑hour written exam (questions on need analysis, specification, idea generation, etc.) | AO1 20 % – knowledge & understanding AO2 40 % – application of knowledge AO3 40 % – analysis, evaluation & justification |
| Component 2 – Paper 2 (Specialist) | 25 % | 2‑hour written exam (questions specific to the chosen specialist option) | Same AO distribution as Paper 1. |
| Component 3 – Coursework (Portfolio) | 50 % | Portfolio (max 1500 words) + practical product | AO1 20 % – knowledge of the design cycle and specialist content AO2 40 % – planning, making and communication AO3 40 % – testing, evaluation and reflection |
| Command Word | What It Asks You to Do | Relevant AO |
|---|---|---|
| Describe | Give a factual account of a process, material or feature. | AO1 |
| Explain | Give reasons or causes; link theory to practice. | AO2 |
| Analyse | Break down information, identify trends or relationships. | AO3 |
| Evaluate | Judge the merit of a solution using criteria; suggest improvements. | AO3 |
| Justify | Provide a logical argument supporting a choice or design decision. | AO3 |
| Design | Produce a detailed plan or drawing that meets a brief. | AO2 |
Create an account or Login to take a Quiz
Log in to suggest improvements to this note.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.