justify personal perspective(s) using evidence and reasoning

Resources → Subject Notes → Global Perspectives → Lesson Plan

Reflection in Global Perspectives (Cambridge IGCSE 0457)

1. Syllabus overview – why reflection matters

  • Core aims: develop research, analysis, evaluation, communication and collaboration skills.
  • Reflection (AO2) is one of three Assessment Objectives (AO1 = knowledge & understanding, AO2 = reflection, AO3 = collaboration).
  • All three AOs together account for the final qualification (AO1 30 % | AO2 30 % | AO3 40 %).
  • Reflection links personal learning to the global‑local context and underpins the written components of the course.

2. The 24 Global Perspectives topics (any one may be chosen)

  • Culture, identity & diversity
  • Health & well‑being
  • Education & learning
  • Human rights & justice
  • Economic development
  • Environmental sustainability
  • Technology & innovation
  • Population & migration
  • Conflict & peace‑building
  • Global governance
  • … (and 14 further themes listed in the official syllabus)

Every piece of reflection must be anchored to a chosen issue from this list.

3. Course components

Component Purpose Word‑count / format Relevant AOs
Component 1 – Written exam (source‑based) Test knowledge, understanding and analytical skills (AO1). 45 min, 30 % of total mark. AO1 only.
Component 2 – Individual Report Investigate a global issue, present evidence and justify a personal perspective. 1 500‑2 000 words, 30 % of total mark. AO1 + AO2 (research + reflection).
Component 3 – Team Project (team + personal elements) Plan and carry out a practical action, then reflect individually.
  • Team planning & research (≈ 800 words)
  • Evidence of action (photos, data, surveys)
  • Reflective paper (≈ 800 words)
 AO1 + AO2 + AO3 (research, reflection, collaboration).

4. Academic honesty & referencing

  • All sources must be acknowledged using the Cambridge referencing style (author, year, title, publisher/URL).
  • Plagiarism is penalised – paraphrase in your own words and cite every direct quote.
  • The bibliography is not included in the word‑limit.

5. AO2 – Reflection strands (Tables E‑G of the syllabus)

Strand What the examiner looks for How to demonstrate it
Personal learning Evidence that research or discussion has deepened or altered your own understanding, attitudes or values. State your initial view, then cite specific evidence that caused you to rethink or confirm that view.
Teamwork and collaboration Critical appraisal of the group process, communication, and your individual role. Give concrete examples of successful collaboration, note any difficulties, and suggest realistic improvements.
Evaluation of the action Judgement of the planned or carried‑out action – its impact, effectiveness and possible refinements. State the intended outcome, present evidence of what actually happened, analyse reasons for success or shortfall, and propose refinements.

Reflection checklist (for the Reflective Paper)

  • ✓ How did the research change my original view?
  • ✓ What have I learned about my own strengths and weaknesses as a learner and team member?
  • ✓ How effective was our team’s action and what could be improved?
  • ✓ Have I considered alternative viewpoints objectively?
  • ✓ Have I cited all sources correctly?

6. Steps to justify a personal perspective (AO2)

  1. State the perspective clearly. Use a concise thesis‑like sentence.
  2. Gather relevant evidence. Include at least three different types (e.g., statistics, expert opinion, case study, personal experience, historical data).
  3. Analyse the evidence. Explain how each piece supports (or challenges) your stance.
  4. Use logical reasoning. Link evidence to claim through cause‑and‑effect, comparison, analogy or statistical inference.
  5. Consider alternative viewpoints.
    • Identify a credible opposing argument.
    • Assess its reliability (bias, source credibility, relevance).
    • Explain why, after this analysis, your own perspective remains stronger.
  6. Reflect on personal learning. Note any change in attitude, understanding or values.
  7. Conclude with a balanced summary. Restate the main point, recap supporting evidence, acknowledge limitations, and suggest next steps or further research.

7. Types of evidence (with brief examples)

Type Description Illustrative example
Statistical data Quantitative figures from up‑to‑date, reputable sources. World Bank (2023) – 1.2 billion people lack access to clean water.
Expert opinion Statements from recognised authorities or organisations. UNICEF (2022) report on child education outcomes.
Personal experience First‑hand observation or action that relates directly to the issue. Volunteering at a local recycling centre for three months.
Case study Detailed examination of a specific example. Bangladesh’s cyclone‑resilient housing project (2021‑2024).
Historical evidence Past events that illustrate trends or consequences. Impact of the 2008 financial crisis on global poverty rates.

8. Sample reflection structure (≈ 800 words)

  1. Opening sentence: State your personal perspective on the chosen issue.
  2. Evidence paragraphs: For each piece of evidence, present the source, then analyse how it supports your view.
  3. Counter‑argument paragraph: Introduce an opposing viewpoint, evaluate its reliability, and explain why your perspective remains stronger.
  4. Personal learning paragraph: Describe any shift in your attitude, understanding or values after evaluating the evidence.
  5. Conclusion: Summarise the justification, acknowledge any uncertainties, and suggest possible further action or research.

9. Evaluating the action (team‑project component)

  • Intended outcome: e.g., “Reduce single‑use plastic consumption by 20 % in three months.”
  • Evidence of what happened: Survey results, waste‑audit figures, feedback forms, photographs.
  • Analysis: Discuss why the action succeeded or fell short (resource availability, team dynamics, external factors).
  • Improvements: Propose realistic refinements for a future iteration (e.g., stronger publicity, partnership with local businesses).

10. Tips for an effective justification

  • Choose **credible** sources: academic journals, reputable NGOs, government statistics.
  • Quote or paraphrase accurately and cite using Cambridge referencing.
  • Link each piece of evidence **directly** to your claim – avoid tangential information.
  • Arrange evidence in order of strength (most persuasive first).
  • Be concise; clear language beats ornate phrasing.
  • After each piece of evidence, note whether it **confirmed, challenged or refined** your original view.
  • Remember the **global‑local perspective** – show how the issue affects both worldwide trends and your own community.

11. Practice activity

Choose a Global Perspectives issue (e.g., “The impact of fast fashion on the environment”). Write a short reflection (150‑200 words) that:

  1. States your personal stance.
  2. Provides at least three different types of evidence (from the table above).
  3. Explains how each piece of evidence supports your stance.
  4. Addresses one counter‑argument, analysing its reliability.
  5. Reflects on any change in your thinking.
  6. Concludes with a balanced summary and, if relevant, a brief evaluation of a proposed action.

12. Quick reference – AO weighting

Assessment Objective Weighting in final qualification Key evidence required
AO1 – Knowledge & understanding 30 % Accurate factual information, definitions, context.
AO2 – Reflection 30 % Justified personal perspective, evaluation of action, personal learning.
AO3 – Collaboration 40 % Evidence of teamwork, communication, shared responsibility.

Create an account or Login to take a Quiz

33 views
0 improvement suggestions

Log in to suggest improvements to this note.