Shortages (demand exceeding supply) and surpluses (supply exceeding demand)

Allocation of Resources – Price Determination (Cambridge 2.4)

1. The Price Mechanism

Definition (Cambridge 2.4.1): The price mechanism is the process by which the forces of demand and supply interact in a market to allocate resources and to determine the price at which the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied.

2. Key Concepts

  • Demand (Qd): quantity of a good that consumers are willing and able to buy at each possible price.
  • Supply (Qs): quantity of a good that producers are willing and able to sell at each possible price.
  • Market equilibrium (Cambridge 2.4.2): the point where Qd = Qs. At this point the market “clears” – there is no tendency for the price to change.
  • Equilibrium price (Pe) and equilibrium quantity (Qe): the price and quantity at the equilibrium point.
  • Shortage: Qd > Qs at a given price (price below Pe).
  • Surplus: Qs > Qd at a given price (price above Pe).

3. How Shortages and Surpluses Arise

When the market price is not at the equilibrium level, either a shortage or a surplus will develop, creating a pressure for the price to move toward Pe.

  1. Price set above equilibrium (P > Pe)
    • Qs > QdSurplus.
    • Producers have excess stock and will tend to lower the price to clear the surplus.
  2. Price set below equilibrium (P < Pe)
    • Qd > QsShortage.
    • Consumers cannot obtain enough of the good; they will bid the price up.

4. Graphical Illustration (What you must be able to draw and label)

Diagram 1 – Demand (D) and Supply (S) curves showing: (a) equilibrium, (b) a price above equilibrium (surplus), (c) a price below equilibrium (shortage). Each diagram must be clearly labelled with Pe, Qe, the surplus/shortage area and the direction of price pressure.

5. Linear Demand and Supply Functions (Mathematical representation)

Demand:  Qd = a – bP

Supply:  Qs = c + dP

where a, b, c, d are positive constants.

At equilibrium:

a – bPe = c + dPe

Solving for the equilibrium price:

Pe = (a – c) / (b + d)

6. Consequences of Shortages

  • Rationing (first‑come‑first‑served, coupons, queues, or other non‑price allocation).
  • Black‑market activity.
  • Consumers may switch to close substitutes.
  • Higher marginal revenue for producers → incentive to increase output.

7. Consequences of Surpluses

  • Unsold inventory and higher storage costs.
  • Producers may cut output, lay off workers, or reduce investment.
  • Downward pressure on price, moving the market back toward equilibrium.
  • Possible government intervention (price floors, purchases of excess stock, storage schemes).

8. Supply‑and‑Demand Schedule Example

Price (P) Quantity Demanded (Qd) Quantity Supplied (Qs) Market Condition
$2 120 60 Shortage (120 – 60 = 60)
$4 80 80 Equilibrium
$6 40 100 Surplus (100 – 40 = 60)

9. How Markets Self‑Correct

  • Shortage: upward pressure on price reduces Qd and encourages producers to increase output → movement toward equilibrium.
  • Surplus: downward pressure on price increases Qd and reduces output → movement toward equilibrium.

Price Changes – Causes and Consequences (Cambridge 2.5)

1. What causes a price change?

A change in market price occurs only when either the demand curve or the supply curve shifts.

  • Demand shift (right‑ward = increase, left‑ward = decrease) → price moves up or down.
  • Supply shift (right‑ward = increase, left‑ward = decrease) → price moves down or up.

Thus, “price changes are caused by changes in demand and supply” – exactly as the syllabus states.

2. Shift of the Demand Curve

  • Right‑ward (increase): consumers want more of the good at every price (e.g., rise in income for a normal good, larger population, favourable tastes).
  • Left‑ward (decrease): the opposite occurs (e.g., fall in income for a normal good, unfavourable tastes).
Scenario Initial Equilibrium After Right‑ward Shift of Demand Effect on P and Q
Increase in consumer income (normal good) Pe = $4,  Qe = 80 Pe = $5,  Qe = 100 Price ↑, Quantity ↑
Decrease in consumer income (normal good) Pe = $4,  Qe = 80 Pe = $3,  Qe = 60 Price ↓, Quantity ↓

3. Shift of the Supply Curve

  • Right‑ward (increase): producers can supply more at each price (e.g., lower input costs, technological improvement, entry of new firms).
  • Left‑ward (decrease): production becomes more costly or fewer firms operate (e.g., higher input prices, stricter regulations).
Scenario Initial Equilibrium After Right‑ward Shift of Supply Effect on P and Q
Technological improvement Pe = $4,  Qe = 80 Pe = $3,  Qe = 100 Price ↓, Quantity ↑
Increase in input prices Pe = $4,  Qe = 80 Pe = $5,  Qe = 60 Price ↑, Quantity ↓

4. Consequences for Sales Revenue

  • Sales revenue (total revenue) = P × Q.
  • The direction of change depends on the price elasticity of demand (see Section 2.6).
  • When a curve shifts, the new equilibrium price and quantity determine the revenue outcome.

Price Elasticity of Demand (PED) – Cambridge 2.6

1. Definition & Formula

Price elasticity of demand (PED) measures the responsiveness of the quantity demanded to a change in price.

$$\text{PED} = \frac{\%\Delta Q_{d}}{\%\Delta P}$$

Where %ΔQd is the percentage change in quantity demanded and %ΔP is the percentage change in price.

2. Interpretation – Elasticity Ranges

PED valueElasticity typeRevenue implication when price rises
0Perfectly inelasticRevenue rises (quantity unchanged)
0 < |PED| < 1InelasticRevenue rises
|PED| = 1Unit elasticRevenue unchanged
|PED| > 1ElasticRevenue falls
Perfectly elasticAny price rise drives quantity to zero → revenue falls to zero

3. The Three Extreme Cases

  • Perfectly inelastic demand (PED = 0): quantity demanded does not change regardless of price (e.g., life‑saving insulin for a patient who cannot do without it).
  • Unitary elasticity (|PED| = 1): the percentage change in quantity demanded exactly matches the percentage change in price; total revenue is unchanged.
  • Perfectly elastic demand (|PED| = ∞): consumers will buy any amount at one price but none if the price rises even slightly (e.g., a commodity sold in a perfectly competitive market where sellers are price‑takers).

4. Determinants of PED (Cambridge 2.6.3)

  • Availability of close substitutes – more substitutes → higher elasticity.
  • Proportion of income spent on the good – larger share → higher elasticity.
  • Time period considered – demand is more elastic in the long run because consumers have time to find alternatives.

5. Impact on Revenue & Consumer Expenditure

  • If demand is elastic, a price rise reduces total revenue; consumer expenditure falls.
  • If demand is inelastic, a price rise increases total revenue; consumer expenditure rises.
  • If demand is unit elastic, total revenue is unchanged.

6. Worked Example

Price of a mobile‑phone case rises from $10 to $12 (a 20 % increase). Quantity demanded falls from 500 units to 425 units (a 15 % decrease).

$$\text{PED} = \frac{-15\%}{+20\%} = -0.75$$

Interpretation:

  • Absolute value < 1 → demand is inelastic.
  • Because demand is inelastic, the 20 % price rise increases total revenue for the seller.
  • Consumer expenditure also rises (price up, quantity falls only slightly).

Price Elasticity of Supply (PES) – Cambridge 2.7

1. Definition & Formula

Price elasticity of supply (PES) measures the responsiveness of the quantity supplied to a change in price.

$$\text{PES} = \frac{\%\Delta Q_{s}}{\%\Delta P}$$

2. Determinants of PES

  • Availability of inputs – if inputs are abundant, supply is more elastic.
  • Time period – supply is more elastic in the long run because firms can adjust plant size, enter/exit the market, or adopt new technology.
  • Spare productive capacity – firms with excess capacity can increase output quickly, making supply more elastic.
  • Flexibility of production techniques – more flexible processes → higher PES.

3. Example

Suppose the price of wheat rises from $200 to $250 per tonne (a 25 % increase) and the quantity supplied rises from 1 000 000 t to 1 250 000 t (a 25 % increase).

$$\text{PES} = \frac{+25\%}{+25\%} = 1$$

Supply is unit elastic in this case.


Market Economic System (Cambridge 2.8)

Definition

A market (or free‑market) economic system is one in which the allocation of resources and the distribution of output are primarily decided by the price mechanism – i.e., by the interaction of buyers and sellers in markets without central government direction.

Advantages

  • Efficient allocation of resources (goods go to those who value them most).
  • Encourages innovation and entrepreneurship.
  • Consumers have a wide choice of goods and services.
  • Prices provide information about scarcity.

Disadvantages

  • Can lead to inequality of income and wealth.
  • May produce market failures (public goods, externalities, monopolies).
  • Short‑term focus on profit can ignore social or environmental costs.
  • Not all goods and services are supplied in adequate quantities (e.g., health care, education).

Market Failure (Cambridge 2.9)

1. Public, Merit and Demerit Goods

  • Public goods – non‑rival and non‑excludable (e.g., street lighting). Markets under‑provide them because firms cannot charge each user.
  • Merit goods – socially desirable but under‑consumed (e.g., vaccinations). Government may subsidise or provide them.
  • Demerit goods – socially undesirable and over‑consumed (e.g., cigarettes). Government may tax or restrict them.

2. Externalities

  • Negative externality – a cost imposed on third parties (e.g., pollution from a factory). Leads to over‑production.
  • Positive externality – a benefit enjoyed by third parties (e.g., a well‑maintained garden improving neighbourhood property values). Leads to under‑production.

3. Monopoly

  • A single firm is the sole supplier of a product with no close substitutes.
  • Monopolies can set price above marginal cost, creating a dead‑weight loss and a permanent surplus (unsold consumer surplus).

Mixed Economic System (Cambridge 2.10)

Definition

A mixed economic system combines features of a market economy with government intervention. The market determines most prices and outputs, but the state intervenes to correct market failures, provide public goods, and achieve social objectives.

Arguments for a Mixed System

  • Corrects market failures (e.g., taxes on pollution, subsidies for education).
  • Provides a safety net and reduces extreme inequality.
  • Ensures the supply of merit goods and the control of demerit goods.

Arguments against a Mixed System

  • Government intervention can distort price signals, leading to inefficiency.
  • Risk of bureaucracy, corruption, or political misuse of resources.
  • Excessive regulation may stifle innovation and entrepreneurship.

Typical Government Tools

  • Price floors (e.g., minimum wage) – set a minimum legal price above the equilibrium price.
  • Price ceilings (e.g., rent control) – set a maximum legal price below the equilibrium price.
  • Taxes – raise the price of demerit goods or generate revenue to fund public services.
  • Subsidies – lower the price of merit goods or encourage production of socially desirable outputs.
  • Regulation – standards for safety, environmental protection, or quality.
  • Direct provision – government produces or purchases goods (e.g., NHS, public transport).

Key Points to Remember

  1. Market equilibrium occurs where Qd = Qs. It is the result of the price mechanism.
  2. A price above equilibrium creates a surplus; a price below equilibrium creates a shortage.
  3. Price adjustments (upward or downward) act as signals that move the market back toward equilibrium.
  4. Price changes are caused by shifts in demand or supply – not by movement along the curves alone.
  5. Price elasticity of demand (PED) shows how quantity demanded responds to price changes; it determines the revenue effect of a price change.
  6. Price elasticity of supply (PES) shows how quantity supplied responds to price changes; it is influenced by input availability, time, and spare capacity.
  7. Market failures (public/merit/demerit goods, externalities, monopoly) justify government intervention.
  8. A mixed economic system blends market allocation with state intervention to achieve efficiency and equity.
  9. Government tools (price floors/ceilings, taxes, subsidies, regulation) can correct disequilibrium but may also create new inefficiencies.

Create an account or Login to take a Quiz

88 views
0 improvement suggestions

Log in to suggest improvements to this note.