Fiscal policy – the combination of government spending and taxation – is the main tool used to move the economy towards these aims.
2. Definition and Objectives of Fiscal Policy
Fiscal policy: the use of government spending (G) and taxation (T) to influence aggregate demand (AD) and, consequently, output, employment, price level and other macro‑economic goals.
Four syllabus‑stated objectives (must be linked to a tax or spending measure):
Stabilisation – counteract recessions or inflation (e.g., a temporary tax cut to boost AD).
Redistribution – make the tax system more progressive (e.g., higher rates on high incomes).
Long‑run distribution also depends on labour‑market policies, education and skill formation.
9. Diagrams Required for Paper 2
AD–AS diagram – show a leftward shift of AD after a tax increase and a rightward shift after a tax cut; label the initial and new equilibrium price level (P) and output (Y).
Tax‑multiplier diagram – plot the consumption function before and after a change in T to illustrate the negative slope of ΔY/ΔT.
Supply‑and‑demand diagram for a specific good – e.g., an excise duty on cigarettes shifts the supply curve upward (or the demand curve leftward), illustrating the efficiency effect.
Hand‑drawn diagrams are acceptable; ensure all axes, curves and shifts are clearly labelled.
10. Real‑World Examples of Tax Measures (IGCSE‑relevant)
Income‑tax cut – United Kingdom (2022): basic rate reduced from 20 % to 19 % to stimulate consumer spending.
Corporate‑tax increase – Germany (2021): statutory rate raised from 15 % to 25 % to fund pandemic‑related health expenditure.
VAT reduction – India (2020): standard rate cut from 18 % to 12 % on selected goods to boost demand during COVID‑19.
Excise duty on tobacco – Australia (2023): 10 % increase aimed at reducing smoking (efficiency/negative externality).
Carbon tax – Sweden (2017 onward): tax on CO₂ emissions to encourage greener production and meet environmental targets.
11. Limitations and Unintended Consequences of Tax Changes
Time lags – recognition, implementation and impact lags can delay the desired effect on AD.
Crowding‑out – a tax cut that widens the deficit may force the government to borrow; higher interest rates can suppress private investment.
Laffer‑curve effect – excessively high tax rates may discourage work and investment, reducing total revenue.
Equity concerns – uniform tax cuts often benefit higher‑income groups more, potentially widening inequality.
Efficiency losses – distortionary taxes can move consumption and production away from the most efficient allocation.
Behavioural responses – tax avoidance, evasion, or shifting activity abroad can weaken the intended impact.
International competitiveness – high corporate tax rates may drive firms to relocate, affecting the balance of payments.
12. Evaluation Checklist for Exam Answers (AO2)
Identify the measure (tax increase or decrease) and classify it (direct/indirect, progressive‑regressive‑proportional, excise/VAT/customs, green tax).
Explain the short‑run effect on disposable income, consumption, investment and AD using Y_d = Y – T and the tax‑multiplier.
State the sign and magnitude of the tax multiplier; interpret the negative sign.
Analyse short‑run outcomes for output, unemployment, government revenue and the budget balance.
Suggested AD–AS diagram: leftward shift of AD after a tax increase and rightward shift after a tax cut. Label the initial equilibrium (P₀, Y₀) and the new equilibria (P₁, Y₁) for each case.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources,
past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.