| Reason (syllabus) | Brief explanation | Concrete example (age‑appropriate) |
|---|---|---|
| Financial pressures | Sales fall or profit margins shrink so the business cannot afford the current staff level. | Orders drop 30 % after a new competitor enters the market → labour costs become unsustainable. |
| Technological change | Automation, new software or equipment makes some jobs redundant. | Robotic packaging line replaces three manual packers. |
| Organisational restructuring | Mergers, acquisitions or strategic shifts create duplicate roles. | Two finance departments are merged after a takeover, leaving one accountant surplus. |
| Market changes | Loss of a major contract, new competitors or a shift in consumer demand reduces the need for staff. | Key retailer stops ordering, so the sales team can be reduced. |
| Efficiency drives | Lean‑production or cost‑cutting programmes require a review of staffing levels. | Introducing a just‑in‑time system cuts the need for a large inventory‑control team. |
Exam tip: The syllabus asks “why” – always link the cause (e.g., “automation”) to the effect (e.g., “fewer operators needed”). A short cause‑effect sentence earns full marks.
| Aspect | Redundancy (business‑driven) | Dismissal (person‑driven) |
|---|---|---|
| Reason | The role itself is no longer required. | The employee’s conduct or performance is unsatisfactory. |
| Legal test | “Is the position still needed?” | “Has the employee breached contract terms?” |
| Typical example | Automation of a packaging line makes three operators redundant. | Repeated lateness leads to dismissal for misconduct. |
One‑sentence summary for exam answers: “Redundancy is a business‑driven removal of a role; dismissal is a person‑driven termination for conduct or performance.”
When a redundancy is being considered, the following statutory controls must be observed. Each control is shown with the exact syllabus phrase and a one‑line impact statement.
Convert the seven‑step flow into a checklist that students can copy verbatim into an exam answer.
Evaluation cue (AO4): After listing the steps, briefly evaluate the fairness of the process (e.g., “The use of objective criteria and consultation promotes procedural fairness, but the process could be criticised if seniority is ignored where it is a statutory tie‑breaker.”).
| Criterion | Why it is used (exam‑level justification) |
|---|---|
| Performance | Low‑performing staff contribute less to productivity and are less likely to meet future targets. |
| Skills and qualifications | Employees lacking the skills required for the re‑structured business are less adaptable and increase training costs. |
| Attendance and reliability | High absenteeism raises operational disruption and costs, especially in production environments. |
| Length of service (seniority) | May be considered as a tie‑breaker; however, it must be balanced against performance and skill relevance to avoid unfairness. |
| Potential for redeployment | Staff who can be transferred to other roles reduce overall redundancy costs and preserve valuable knowledge. |
Sample marking rubric (AO2/AO3)
| Mark band | What the examiner looks for |
|---|---|
| 1–2 | Lists at least two criteria but provides little or no justification. |
| 3–4 | Lists three–four criteria and gives a brief, relevant justification for each. |
| 5–6 | Lists all five criteria, explains each with a clear link to business needs, and shows awareness of legal constraints (e.g., non‑discrimination). |
Mitigation strategies: transparent communication, support services, and involving staff in redesigning work processes.
Scenario: A mid‑size manufacturing firm has experienced a 30 % drop in orders over the past year because a new competitor entered the market. The firm must cut costs by £500 000 per year. The current workforce consists of 50 employees in production, administration, sales and maintenance.
Justification: The selected employees have the lowest performance scores, limited skill relevance to the new production process and higher absenteeism. Retaining the higher‑performing, cross‑trained staff ensures the firm can maintain quality, meet the required £500 000 cost reduction and comply with legal and ethical standards.
Create an account or Login to take a Quiz
Log in to suggest improvements to this note.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.