recommend and justify which employee(s) to make redundant in a given situation

2.3.3 Why Reducing the Size of the Workforce Might Be Necessary

1. Key Reasons (Cambridge syllabus wording)

Reason (syllabus) Brief explanation Concrete example (age‑appropriate)
Financial pressures Sales fall or profit margins shrink so the business cannot afford the current staff level. Orders drop 30 % after a new competitor enters the market → labour costs become unsustainable.
Technological change Automation, new software or equipment makes some jobs redundant. Robotic packaging line replaces three manual packers.
Organisational restructuring Mergers, acquisitions or strategic shifts create duplicate roles. Two finance departments are merged after a takeover, leaving one accountant surplus.
Market changes Loss of a major contract, new competitors or a shift in consumer demand reduces the need for staff. Key retailer stops ordering, so the sales team can be reduced.
Efficiency drives Lean‑production or cost‑cutting programmes require a review of staffing levels. Introducing a just‑in‑time system cuts the need for a large inventory‑control team.

Exam tip: The syllabus asks “why” – always link the cause (e.g., “automation”) to the effect (e.g., “fewer operators needed”). A short cause‑effect sentence earns full marks.

2. Distinguishing Redundancy from Dismissal

Aspect Redundancy (business‑driven) Dismissal (person‑driven)
Reason The role itself is no longer required. The employee’s conduct or performance is unsatisfactory.
Legal test “Is the position still needed?” “Has the employee breached contract terms?”
Typical example Automation of a packaging line makes three operators redundant. Repeated lateness leads to dismissal for misconduct.

One‑sentence summary for exam answers: “Redundancy is a business‑driven removal of a role; dismissal is a person‑driven termination for conduct or performance.”

2.3.4 Legal Controls Over Employment Issues (Cambridge wording)

When a redundancy is being considered, the following statutory controls must be observed. Each control is shown with the exact syllabus phrase and a one‑line impact statement.

  • Legal controls over employment contracts – terms must be honoured; any change requires mutual agreement or proper notice. Impact: Breaching a contract can give the employee a claim for wrongful dismissal.
  • Legal controls over unfair dismissal legislation – redundancy must be a genuine business reason and follow a fair procedure. Impact: Failure to follow the statutory procedure can render the dismissal unfair.
  • Legal controls over discrimination law – selection criteria must not discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, disability, religion, etc. Impact: Discriminatory criteria expose the employer to tribunal claims.
  • Legal controls over health & safety regulations – the remaining workforce must still be able to work safely. Impact: Over‑working staff can breach H&S duties and attract enforcement action.
  • Legal controls over minimum wage & working‑time regulations – redundancy must not be used to avoid paying statutory entitlements. Impact: Under‑paying breaches employment law and can lead to fines.
  • Legal controls over redundancy payments (Redundancy Payments Act or equivalent) – eligible employees are entitled to statutory redundancy pay. Impact: Non‑payment results in a legal claim for arrears.

2.3.3 Process for Selecting Employees for Redundancy

Convert the seven‑step flow into a checklist that students can copy verbatim into an exam answer.

  1. Analyse business needs – Identify which functions are essential for the future operation.
  2. Identify roles at risk – Map every role against the essential functions.
  3. Develop selection criteria – Use objective, non‑discriminatory criteria (performance, skills, attendance, qualifications, redeployment potential).
  4. Apply criteria consistently – Score each employee, rank them and create a shortlist.
  5. Consult and communicate – Explain the process, allow employees to respond, and consider voluntary redundancy.
  6. Make final decisions – Document the rationale for each redundancy decision.
  7. Implement support measures – Provide notice, statutory redundancy pay, out‑placement services and, where possible, training for alternative employment.

Evaluation cue (AO4): After listing the steps, briefly evaluate the fairness of the process (e.g., “The use of objective criteria and consultation promotes procedural fairness, but the process could be criticised if seniority is ignored where it is a statutory tie‑breaker.”).

2.3.3 Selection Criteria (with justification and marking rubric)

Criterion Why it is used (exam‑level justification)
Performance Low‑performing staff contribute less to productivity and are less likely to meet future targets.
Skills and qualifications Employees lacking the skills required for the re‑structured business are less adaptable and increase training costs.
Attendance and reliability High absenteeism raises operational disruption and costs, especially in production environments.
Length of service (seniority) May be considered as a tie‑breaker; however, it must be balanced against performance and skill relevance to avoid unfairness.
Potential for redeployment Staff who can be transferred to other roles reduce overall redundancy costs and preserve valuable knowledge.

Sample marking rubric (AO2/AO3)

Mark band What the examiner looks for
1–2 Lists at least two criteria but provides little or no justification.
3–4 Lists three–four criteria and gives a brief, relevant justification for each.
5–6 Lists all five criteria, explains each with a clear link to business needs, and shows awareness of legal constraints (e.g., non‑discrimination).

2.3.3 Impact on Employees and the Business

Short‑term effects

  • Reduced morale and increased anxiety among remaining staff.
  • Potential loss of productivity while work is re‑organised.
  • Negative publicity that may affect the company’s brand.

Long‑term effects

  • Lower operating costs and improved profitability if redundancies are well‑targeted.
  • Opportunity to introduce new technology or processes with a leaner workforce.
  • Risk of skill gaps if critical knowledge is lost; mitigated by training or redeployment.

Mitigation strategies: transparent communication, support services, and involving staff in redesigning work processes.

2.3.3 Voluntary Redundancy and Support Measures

  • Offer voluntary redundancy first – reduces compulsory dismissals and demonstrates good faith.
  • Statutory redundancy pay (or higher contractual payments) must be offered to eligible employees.
  • Out‑placement services – CV writing, interview coaching, job‑search assistance.
  • Retraining programmes – help staff qualify for other roles within or outside the organisation.
  • Counselling or employee‑assistance programmes – address emotional impact.

2.3.3 Sample Scenario and Recommendation (exam‑style)

Scenario: A mid‑size manufacturing firm has experienced a 30 % drop in orders over the past year because a new competitor entered the market. The firm must cut costs by £500 000 per year. The current workforce consists of 50 employees in production, administration, sales and maintenance.

  1. Analyse the cost structure – Labour costs total £800 000.
  2. Identify non‑essential functions – Sales staff are still required; the production line can be streamlined.
  3. Develop selection criteria – Performance (last 2 years), skill relevance to the revised production process, attendance record, potential for redeployment.
  4. Apply criteria:
    • Three senior production operators: high performance, specialised skills – retain.
    • Five junior operators: lower performance, limited transferable skills – shortlist.
    • Two maintenance technicians: cross‑trained in machinery and health‑and‑safety – retain.
    • One maintenance technician: poor attendance – shortlist.
  5. Consult – Offer voluntary redundancy to the shortlisted staff and provide out‑placement support.
  6. Final decision – Make four employees redundant: the two junior operators with the lowest performance scores and the maintenance technician with poor attendance.

Justification: The selected employees have the lowest performance scores, limited skill relevance to the new production process and higher absenteeism. Retaining the higher‑performing, cross‑trained staff ensures the firm can maintain quality, meet the required £500 000 cost reduction and comply with legal and ethical standards.

Suggested diagram: Flowchart of the redundancy selection process – from business analysis to final decision and support measures.

Create an account or Login to take a Quiz

47 views
0 improvement suggestions

Log in to suggest improvements to this note.