Describe how the physical and chemical properties of the main plastics determine which disposal method is most suitable and what environmental impacts may arise.
Typical conditions: 150–250 °C, inert atmosphere, peroxide or UV initiator.
| Plastic (polymer name) | Monomer(s) | Polymerisation type | Melting / transition point (°C) | Density (g cm⁻³) | Key property for disposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyethylene (PE) – LDPE / HDPE | Ethene CH₂=CH₂ | Addition (radical) | LDPE ≈ 105, HDPE ≈ 130 | 0.91 – 0.96 | Very low density, excellent chemical resistance, flexible (LDPE) or rigid (HDPE) |
| Polypropylene (PP) | Propene CH₂=CHCH₃ | Addition (radical) | ≈ 160 | ≈ 0.90 | Higher melting point than PE, stiff, good fatigue resistance |
| Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) | Vinyl chloride CH₂=CHCl | Addition (radical) | ≈ 80 °C (decomposes before true melting) | 1.30 – 1.45 | Hard, flame‑retardant, high chlorine content |
| Polystyrene (PS) | Styrene C₆H₅CH=CH₂ | Addition (radical) | ≈ 240 | 1.04 – 1.06 | Transparent, brittle, low impact resistance |
| Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) – condensation polymer | Ethylene glycol HO‑CH₂‑CH₂‑OH + terephthalic acid HOOC‑C₆H₄‑COOH | Condensation (step‑growth) | Glass‑transition ≈ 80 °C; crystallisation/melting ≈ 260 °C | 1.38 – 1.40 | Clear, strong, good gas barrier, widely recycled |
| Nylon‑6,6 – condensation polymer | Hexamethylenediamine H₂N‑(CH₂)₆‑NH₂ + adipic acid HOOC‑(CH₂)₄‑COOH | Condensation (step‑growth) | ≈ 260 | ≈ 1.15 | High tensile strength, semi‑crystalline |
| Polylactic acid (PLA) – biodegradable, condensation polymer | Lactic acid CH₃‑CH(OH)‑COOH (via lactide) | Condensation (ring‑opening polymerisation) | ≈ 150‑180 | ≈ 1.25 | Biodegradable under industrial composting (≈ 58 °C, high moisture) |
| Disposal method | Plastic types that suit the method (by property) | Advantages | Environmental concerns |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical recycling (melting & re‑extrusion) | PE, PP, PET – moderate melting points, good melt flow, limited additives | Reduces demand for virgin polymer; lower energy use than incineration | Polymer chain scission reduces strength after several cycles; contamination with other polymers or additives lowers quality |
| Chemical recycling (depolymerisation) | PET (hydrolysis / glycolysis), PS (solvent depolymerisation) | Monomers can be recovered for virgin‑polymer synthesis; can handle coloured or mixed waste | Requires strong acids, bases or organic solvents; generates hazardous by‑products that need treatment |
| Incineration with energy recovery | PVC, PS, high‑calorific plastics (PP, PE) – high energy content | Greatly reduces volume; electricity/heat can be captured | Release of toxic gases (HCl from PVC, dioxins from PS); requires efficient flue‑gas cleaning (scrubbers, filters) |
| Landfilling | All plastics, especially mixed or contaminated streams | Simple, low immediate cost; no sorting required | Very long persistence (centuries); leachate may contain additives; occupies limited landfill space; source of micro‑plastics |
| Industrial composting (biodegradation) | PLA, PHA – biodegradable polymers that hydrolyse under ≈ 58 °C, high moisture | Convert to CO₂, water and biomass; reduces landfill load | Only works in specialised facilities; conventional plastics do not degrade and can contaminate compost streams |
| Property | Effect on disposal choice |
|---|---|
| Low melting point (≤ 130 °C) | Easy mechanical recycling; low‑energy incineration but may release volatile organics. |
| High melting point (≥ 240 °C) | Requires high‑temperature recycling equipment; incineration gives high calorific value but needs robust emission controls. |
| High chemical resistance | Limits chemical recycling; favours mechanical recycling or energy recovery. |
| Hydrophilic / biodegradable (PLA, PHA) | Suitable for industrial composting; not appropriate for landfill or conventional recycling. |
| Presence of chlorine (PVC) | Incineration produces HCl → mandatory scrubbing; recycling limited by additive stability. |
| High density (> 1.30 g cm⁻³) | Settles in marine sediments; easier to compact for landfill but harder to separate in recycling streams. |
The same properties that make plastics valuable – durability, chemical resistance, a range of melting points – also dictate how they can be dealt with after use. By linking polymer structure, physical data and environmental behaviour, students can evaluate the advantages and drawbacks of each disposal option and understand why selecting recyclable or biodegradable polymers, improving collection systems and developing better waste‑treatment technologies are essential for sustainable plastic management.
1 For PET the Cambridge syllabus usually quotes the glass‑transition temperature (~80 °C) when discussing recycling, because the material is processed in its amorphous state. The crystallisation/melting temperature (~260 °C) is given for completeness.
Create an account or Login to take a Quiz
Log in to suggest improvements to this note.
Your generous donation helps us continue providing free Cambridge IGCSE & A-Level resources, past papers, syllabus notes, revision questions, and high-quality online tutoring to students across Kenya.