| Lesson Plan |
| Grade: |
Date: 25/02/2026 |
| Subject: Economics |
| Lesson Topic: effect of fiscal, monetary, supply-side, protectionist and exchange rate policies on the balance of payments |
Learning Objective/s:
- Describe how fiscal policy affects the balance of payments through income and import demand.
- Explain the transmission mechanisms of monetary policy on the current and capital accounts.
- Analyse the short‑run and long‑run impacts of supply‑side and protectionist policies on the BoP.
- Evaluate the effectiveness and side‑effects of exchange‑rate interventions in correcting BoP disequilibrium.
|
Materials Needed:
- Projector and slide deck summarising each policy.
- Whiteboard and markers.
- Handout with a comparative table of policy effects.
- Sample exam question sheet.
- Calculators (optional).
|
Introduction:
Begin with a quick poll: Which policy would you first use to fix a large current‑account deficit? Review previous lessons on the current account and exchange‑rate fundamentals. Today’s success criteria: you will be able to explain, compare and evaluate how fiscal, monetary, supply‑side, protectionist and exchange‑rate policies influence the balance of payments.
|
Lesson Structure:
- Do‑now (5’) – students match policies to BoP components on a worksheet.
- Mini‑lecture (10’) – overview of each policy’s transmission mechanism using slides.
- Guided analysis (15’) – work in pairs to fill the summary table for a given country scenario.
- Case study discussion (10’) – evaluate a combination of monetary and exchange‑rate policies from the sample exam question.
- Diagram practice (10’) – sketch the Mundell‑Fleming model showing fiscal vs monetary impact under flexible rates.
- Check for understanding (5’) – quick quiz via Kahoot or an exit ticket.
|
Conclusion:
Summarise how each policy moves the current and capital accounts and the trade‑offs involved. For the exit ticket, write one advantage and one drawback of using exchange‑rate depreciation to correct a deficit. Homework: complete the worksheet extending the analysis to supply‑side reforms and protectionist measures.
|