| Lesson Plan |
| Grade: |
Date: 25/02/2026 |
| Subject: Computer Science |
| Lesson Topic: Explain the benefits and drawbacks of using either a compiler or interpreter and justify the use of each |
Learning Objective/s:
- Describe the fundamental differences between compilers and interpreters.
- Analyse the benefits and drawbacks of each translation approach.
- Justify the selection of a compiler or interpreter for a given programming scenario.
- Compare performance, portability, and development‑cycle implications of both methods.
- Evaluate hybrid models such as byte‑code and JIT compilation.
|
Materials Needed:
- Projector and screen
- Whiteboard and markers
- Handout with comparison table
- Sample source‑code snippets (compiled & interpreted)
- IDE installed on laptops (e.g., VS Code)
- Worksheet for group justification activity
|
Introduction:
Begin with a quick poll: “What languages do you think are compiled and which are interpreted?” Connect this to prior lessons on programming languages. Explain that today’s success criteria are to identify key advantages/disadvantages of each approach and to justify the most suitable choice for a given problem.
|
Lesson Structure:
- Do‑Now (5') – Students list examples of compiled and interpreted languages on the board.
- Mini‑lecture (10') – Present core concepts of compilers vs. interpreters with a flow‑diagram.
- Guided analysis (12') – Examine the benefits/drawbacks table; teacher asks probing questions.
- Group activity (15') – Teams choose an approach for four real‑world scenarios and complete a justification worksheet.
- Whole‑class debrief (8') – Groups share decisions; discuss hybrid models (byte‑code, JIT).
- Quick quiz (5') – Exit ticket: one advantage of a compiler, one of an interpreter, and a scenario where a hybrid is optimal.
|
Conclusion:
Recap the main advantages and trade‑offs of compilers and interpreters, highlighting when hybrid approaches are preferred. Collect the exit tickets and remind students to complete the homework: write a short paragraph comparing two languages of their choice, focusing on the translation method used.
|